Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The history of the Wah-Wah pedal

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The history of the Wah-Wah pedal

    There is an article on the Wah-Wah pedal in the Sunday (7 August 2011) edition of the New York Times, covering the top 2/3 of page 3 of the Business section: "With a Flip Of a Knob, He Heard The Future", by Amy Wallace in her "Protoype" column (Bright Ideas page).

    Using data in the article, I dug a little. The founding patent is US 3,530,224. Searching for patents that reference this patent will likely uncover the whole of Wah-Wah alternatives.
    Last edited by David Schwab; 08-09-2011, 05:48 PM. Reason: fixed patent number

  • #2
    Thanks for the heads up. You sure that's the patent number? I searched for it here: Retrieving Patent from PAT2PDF.org - Free PDF copies of patents: Download and print! and came up with a 1964 patent for a motional feedback speaker system. Interesting, but not what I expected.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Mark Hammer View Post
      Thanks for the heads up. You sure that's the patent number? I searched for it here: Retrieving Patent from PAT2PDF.org - Free PDF copies of patents: Download and print! and came up with a 1964 patent for a motional feedback speaker system. Interesting, but not what I expected.
      When I enter 3,530,224 into pat2pdf I get "B. J. Plunkett, Sept 22, 1970; Foot Controlled Variable Preference Circuit for Musical Instruments."

      pat3530224.pdf

      Wikipedia has a good article on the Wah:

      Wah-wah pedal - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
      It would be possible to describe everything scientifically, but it would make no sense; it would be without meaning, as if you described a Beethoven symphony as a variation of wave pressure. — Albert Einstein


      http://coneyislandguitars.com
      www.soundcloud.com/davidravenmoon

      Comment


      • #4
        Weird. Same numbers entered on two different days yields two different results. Ijust cut and pasted, so it wasn't a typing error. But, yes, got the '67 Plunkett and Kushner patent this time.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Mark Hammer View Post
          Weird. Same numbers entered on two different days yields two different results. Ijust cut and pasted, so it wasn't a typing error. But, yes, got the '67 Plunkett and Kushner patent this time.
          Look a little closer, first number ends 244, second (correct) one ends 224
          Originally posted by Enzo
          I have a sign in my shop that says, "Never think up reasons not to check something."


          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by g-one View Post
            Look a little closer, first number ends 244, second (correct) one ends 224
            Bingo! The original post had the wrong number.
            It would be possible to describe everything scientifically, but it would make no sense; it would be without meaning, as if you described a Beethoven symphony as a variation of wave pressure. — Albert Einstein


            http://coneyislandguitars.com
            www.soundcloud.com/davidravenmoon

            Comment

            Working...
            X