Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Powered up the build for the first time... I'm getting troublesome readings

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Powered up the build for the first time... I'm getting troublesome readings

    So, I just got back and had a buddy come over while we powered up my build for the first time.
    First things first, I used a 25W incandescent limiter to take some readings of the secondary AC and DC voltages with the tubes pulled to take some no load readings on my secondaries. (roughly 1mA resistive max load).
    Using a true RMS meter, I first tested the mains voltage, which read about 118VAC. After a great start, it turns out that was the only measurement that gave me the voltage I expected. My secondary voltages are troublesome. The no load AC voltages measured pretty much exactly what I designed them to be under full drive conditions.
    The secondary which supplies the main amplifier is spec'd for 245-0-245 under a load of 150mA. I was getting 241VAC to center tap from each leg and I turned to my friend and said "bullshit the regulation is that good". I told him I expected to see around 252V-260V.
    Also, the other secondary supply was spec'd for 100-0-100V at 100mA for my +/- voltages. Under no load I was getting about +97VDC and -98VDC (which totally f-ed my bias calculations).
    I then switched to a 60W bulb and put in my put my preamp tubes and driver in, and set the grid voltage for the output tubes before installing them. But the DC was well under 300V, and my secondary fuses on both legs blew open. I suspect they may have fell victim to repeated in rush when switching power on and off. They are 200mA fast blow 2AG.
    What going on do you think? Just a dud power transformer? I'm thinking of calling the manufacturer, but I want to do this again and make sure I get the same figures to be sure. But the fuses blew because of something and I want to find out why before I make any decisions about where to go from here. You know, I really never anticipated having to replace a mains transformer for any other reason than destroying it somehow.



    Funny thing is, I used to bitch about designers who soldered leaded fuses in a circuit because it... well, because its a pain in the ass. That's why. But, I decided to call an audible towards the end of the build and solder these particular fuses in because I was worried about the littelfuse fuse holders being too brittle. So, I soldered those fuses to the board. Figures those were the ones to go!
    If I have a 50% chance of guessing the right answer, I guess wrong 80% of the time.

  • #2
    I could only hazard a wild-@ss guess. But I do wonder what the filament voltages are, and what the secondary voltages are now after the fuses blew (upstream of the fuses, of course!). Consider this just a request for additional data points.
    If it still won't get loud enough, it's probably broken. - Steve Conner
    If the thing works, stop fixing it. - Enzo
    We need more chaos in music, in art... I'm here to make it. - Justin Thomas
    MANY things in human experience can be easily differentiated, yet *impossible* to express as a measurement. - Juan Fahey

    Comment


    • #3
      You get lower than expected voltages BECAUSE you are plugging into a lamp bulb limiter.

      And if you blow fuses is because you pass more current through them than what they are rated for.
      Juan Manuel Fahey

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by eschertron View Post
        I could only hazard a wild-@ss guess. But I do wonder what the filament voltages are, and what the secondary voltages are now after the fuses blew (upstream of the fuses, of course!). Consider this just a request for additional data points.
        Heater voltage measured 3.2-0-3.2VAC with the tubes pulled. I want to double check but, I think with the tubes installed, the voltage dropped under 3V to centertap. The AC voltage on the secondary, POST blown fuse, was 241-0-241VAC.
        I'm goint to mount some fuse holders, instead of using pigtails.
        Then, I'm going to pull all the secondary leads from the circuit, and retest the true unloaded voltages, and try and isolate whether the power transformer needs to be replaced. Which, as far as having to replace singular thing in the amp, is by far the worst case scenario. But, thems the breaks. I'll hold on to this transformer, and design a circuit that uses 250V on the plates, bias it in class A2, and drive those grids into orbit.
        If I have a 50% chance of guessing the right answer, I guess wrong 80% of the time.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by J M Fahey View Post
          And if you blow fuses is because you pass more current through them than what they are rated for.

          If I have a 50% chance of guessing the right answer, I guess wrong 80% of the time.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by J M Fahey View Post
            You get lower than expected voltages BECAUSE you are plugging into a lamp bulb limiter.
            Huh. It's a series resistance, so I see the logic here.
            If I have a 50% chance of guessing the right answer, I guess wrong 80% of the time.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by SoulFetish View Post
              Besides that silly remark, doesnīt that make you think about "what am I doing wrong"? .... which is the point of my suggestion.
              Just sayinī

              I'm probably being a smart ass..
              Well, will that help you solve your problem?
              Juan Manuel Fahey

              Comment


              • #8
                For reference, and for your own peace of mind, when you measure your wall voltage, also measure your AC coming out of the bulb limiter.
                Originally posted by Enzo
                I have a sign in my shop that says, "Never think up reasons not to check something."


                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by J M Fahey View Post
                  Besides that silly remark, doesnīt that make you think about "what am I doing wrong"? .... which is the point of my suggestion.
                  Just sayinī

                  Well, will that help you solve your problem?
                  Juan, you have always been helpful. You are one of my go to guys here because the experience and knowledge you freely share. That and you have a good sense of humor. I was only trying to bust your balls a little. I was hoping it came across in light hearted fun. But if it came across like I was being a dick, I'm sorry. I appreciate you, man.
                  Last edited by SoulFetish; 05-10-2017, 09:14 PM.
                  If I have a 50% chance of guessing the right answer, I guess wrong 80% of the time.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Juan can be touchy sometimes, but he's worth it. Group hug!

                    Ech. I just threw up a little in my mouth.
                    "Take two placebos, works twice as well." Enzo

                    "Now get off my lawn with your silicooties and boom-chucka speakers and computers masquerading as amplifiers" Justin Thomas

                    "If you're not interested in opinions and the experience of others, why even start a thread?
                    You can't just expect consent." Helmholtz

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Cool
                      The idea was to move you out of your stalled position, and think other possibilities.
                      Specifically the line saying:
                      my secondary fuses on both legs blew open. I suspect they may have fell victim to repeated in rush when switching power on and off. They are 200mA fast blow 2AG
                      That instantly makes me think of 4 possibilities, all of which can be checked and discarded, until just one stands.
                      Which one?
                      Dunno, crystal balls not much use here, but [testing rulez!!!!][tm] :
                      to be confirmed or discarded:
                      1) 200 mA is not enough, try next higher.
                      2) fast blow is inadequate: try slow blow.
                      3) both of the above
                      4) 200mA is a mistake. Where did that value come from?
                      * Schematic?
                      * Screened on board?
                      * Old (blown) fuse was 200mA? That doesnīt mean it was the proper value (doubly so if found blown )
                      * You just misread it? I have *always* that problem, my bread and butter 100W SS amplifier uses a 1.5A fuse (220V mains) ; for the very good reason that 1A nuisance blows now and then and 2A is "way too much" . At least 40% customers replace them with 15A ones Some claim (and I believe them) : "Juan, I brought the old fuse to the shop and the attendant gave me the 15A one".
                      * The circuit, for some reason (excessive bias?) might need more current, yet itīs not really "wrong".

                      Please test the different possibilities and tell us what you found.
                      Good luck
                      Juan Manuel Fahey

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by J M Fahey View Post
                        Cool
                        The idea was to move you out of your stalled position, and think other possibilities.
                        Specifically the line saying:
                        That instantly makes me think of 4 possibilities, all of which can be checked and discarded, until just one stands.
                        Which one?
                        Dunno, crystal balls not much use here, but [testing rulez!!!!][tm] :
                        to be confirmed or discarded:
                        1) 200 mA is not enough, try next higher.
                        2) fast blow is inadequate: try slow blow.
                        3) both of the above
                        4) 200mA is a mistake. Where did that value come from?
                        * Schematic?
                        * Screened on board?
                        * Old (blown) fuse was 200mA? That doesnīt mean it was the proper value (doubly so if found blown )
                        * You just misread it? I have *always* that problem, my bread and butter 100W SS amplifier uses a 1.5A fuse (220V mains) ; for the very good reason that 1A nuisance blows now and then and 2A is "way too much" . At least 40% customers replace them with 15A ones Some claim (and I believe them) : "Juan, I brought the old fuse to the shop and the attendant gave me the 15A one".
                        * The circuit, for some reason (excessive bias?) might need more current, yet itīs not really "wrong".

                        Please test the different possibilities and tell us what you found.
                        Good luck
                        Juan, you letting me know that the limiter was the reason for the low voltages shed some light on several things which could have caused the fuses to blow. I didn't know to expect that, although it makes perfect sense now. I'm glad the fuses where there when I plugged it into the mains with the bias voltage where it was. (Lets just say it didn't have a "-" in front of it)
                        I was leaning towards the bias being the reason the fuses blew. But, all the things you mentioned above are still certainly at play as well, among other things.
                        The 200mA fast acting value was a conservative value I chose for the power supply. It's my own amp.

                        I've been at work on this and here is where I'm at so far:
                        Pulled the power transformer secondary leads from the board and ground from the chassis to test for shorts. So far all the resistances seem normal. No continuity where it shouldn't be.The bleeder resistor seems fine. Filter capacitor values come up reading exactly what they should be.
                        When I was going to power it up again, I remember thinking that I should have had the tubes tested. Then I remembered... Shit! I HAVE a tube tester! I got a Triplett in great condition for $50 a few months ago and totally forgot about it. It tests heaters, cathode emission, and shorts, which is fine for this purpose.
                        So, the tubes were all tested and ruled out as causes.
                        After cleaning up some work and checking some other things, I decided to do the power on procedure again. With the amp plugged in to the limiter, and no tubes, no load, I was getting the voltage readings I was expecting to see with my secondaries right at spec. The B+ was a little low, but certainly acceptable. So far, so good.
                        installed the preamp tubes, still, everything looks good. The limiter lights up during inrush, then fades away. So far, so good.
                        So I pulled the output tubes and plugged it into the mains. Flipped the switch, and FLASH, the fuses blew again. Hmmm.

                        Lets go back and double check my choice of fuse.
                        I ran some simulations on my power supply and it looks like 200mA is too low. I ran simulations during inrush at 10ms, 500ms, and 1000ms; as well as simulated conditions at idle and full drive.
                        I got an I^2t value of 0.0193 at inrush, with an RMS current of 497mA @ 100ms, 356ma @500ms, and 192mA under continuous full drive. Quiescent current is around 108mA.
                        I will end up using a larger value going forward anyway, but would this alone cause the fuse to blow? What do you guys think?
                        Last edited by SoulFetish; 05-16-2017, 03:05 AM.
                        If I have a 50% chance of guessing the right answer, I guess wrong 80% of the time.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          here are the results of some simulations.





                          If I have a 50% chance of guessing the right answer, I guess wrong 80% of the time.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I think you could still have a bad power tube. A tube tester can't guarantee a tube is good, only bad.
                            Many power tube faults only show up at higher voltages that the tester usually does not provide.
                            Originally posted by Enzo
                            I have a sign in my shop that says, "Never think up reasons not to check something."


                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by g1 View Post
                              I think you could still have a bad power tube. A tube tester can't guarantee a tube is good, only bad.
                              Many power tube faults only show up at higher voltages that the tester usually does not provide.
                              I may. But there were no power tubes plugged in when the fuse blew. So thats not the reason for the fuse blowing.
                              If I have a 50% chance of guessing the right answer, I guess wrong 80% of the time.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X