Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

AC30 - Freshly repaired, but failed yet again

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • AC30 - Freshly repaired, but failed yet again

    Here's one for my Black Museum.

    A guy called me to say he had an AC30 that had been repaired several times by a local music shop, but had failed again. He just dropped it off and it has to be one of the most messed-up amps I've seen. This is just one section, the rest is similar;

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20170616_170242173.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.40 MB
ID:	871633

  • #2
    They do run hot, so I see extra ventilation...
    Education is what you're left with after you have forgotten what you have learned.

    Comment


    • #3
      There was also a penny on the circuit board. I never knew they did those super-ventilated models as a coin-op.

      Comment


      • #4
        Oh, please, show more photos! That's a good one. Is there any chewing gum and foil wrappers on it?

        Repair shop: "Geez, man. I have no idea why it keeps failing! Works here at the shop...for the 30 seconds I tested it..."
        --
        I build and repair guitar amps
        http://amps.monkeymatic.com

        Comment


        • #5
          I'm sure those vent slots in the top just scream out 'feed me' to kids. I'm surprised we don't hear about this a lot more.
          Originally posted by Enzo
          I have a sign in my shop that says, "Never think up reasons not to check something."


          Comment


          • #6
            I'd make a new quasi-PCB with turrets instead, and jumper wires for traces. The pins on a lot of PC-mount components will fit nicely inside a turret...

            Justin
            "Wow it's red! That doesn't look like the standard Marshall red. It's more like hooker lipstick/clown nose/poodle pecker red." - Chuck H. -
            "Of course that means playing **LOUD** , best but useless solution to modern sissy snowflake players." - J.M. Fahey -
            "All I ever managed to do with that amp was... kill small rodents within a 50 yard radius of my practice building." - Tone Meister -

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Mick Bailey View Post
              There was also a penny on the circuit board. I never knew they did those super-ventilated models as a coin-op.
              They ARE coin-op. But they're not cheap, won't work on a penny. You have to deposit gold sovereigns to keep your Vox happy. Nothing less will do.
              This isn't the future I signed up for.

              Comment


              • #8
                Nice!
                That's an '80's model right?

                I was going to post about a GK 200RCB that was hacked up pretty bad by someone attempting to "repair" it.

                Blown output drivers, an 8 amp fuse that melted the bridge rectifier trying to feed dc into a dead short and 220k resistors where they were supposed to be 470 ohm.
                Guess the "repair guy" read the melted colors wrong.

                Not to mention the ripped up traces
                Oh well, it's fine now.

                Comment


                • #9
                  It's a 70s amp. The boards have a 71 before the location reference, so maybe that's when the circuit was drawn up. They're well-known for burning the PCB (and probably one of the worst AC30s you could buy), and it isn't flame retardant. My plan was to rebuild the power amp as a classic 60's style. A replacement chassis panel in sheet metal, with tag strip and the tube sockets mounted on the new panel for heat dissipation. All in the same locations as a '64. Maybe also to move to separate cathode resistors and bypass caps to prevent current-hogging. A dual-section can cap means just a few resistors and caps to wire directly to the sockets. I have the means to scan and re-create the original PCB with FR4 and heavier copper, but it ends up being the same problem for a future generation.

                  The preamp needs an overhaul, too.

                  The thing about these amps is the chassis was a re-use of the old one, just with a large rectangle cut out to clear the PCB. In this respect it's fairly straightforward to rebuild it and dispense with any circuit board.

                  Sadly, the power transformer has been replaced with an incorrect type. The original PT acted as a chassis brace, but the replacement is another bodge and the chassis flexes so needs further stiffening.

                  More pics to follow.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    See my post #5 here:
                    http://music-electronics-forum.com/t42816/
                    Cheers,
                    Ian

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Mick Bailey View Post
                      Maybe also to move to separate cathode resistors and bypass caps to prevent current-hogging.
                      I once did some measurements on the same pair of EL84s and found that bias current matching was 4 times better with separate cathode resistors than it was with a common resistor. Fixed bias was about 2 times better than a common resistor. I did fixed bias by replacing the common cathode resistor with a 15V zener.
                      Last edited by Dave H; 06-17-2017, 07:06 PM.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Separate cathode resistors it is, then.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          A minor setback with progressing with this job. It's a Stolec Vox, possible around '72 with reverb, and the reverb tray and connecting leads have been removed. There are some redundant holes full of dust in the bottom of the cabinet that I presume are the tray mounting points. The problem I have is the owner insists the reverb was working. So there's that one to resolve.

                          Does anyone know if these amps were fitted with a piezo reverb? There's no sign of a transformer or any mounting location/holes and I can't locate the specific schematic for this particular amp

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Mick Bailey View Post
                            Does anyone know if these amps were fitted with a piezo reverb? There's no sign of a transformer or any mounting location/holes and I can't locate the specific schematic for this particular amp
                            Don't know for sure, but I doubt that it still had a ceramic cartridge reverb by then. Could have had a direct tube driven reverb like an Ampeg or a Gibson.

                            The basic schematic for the AC-30 didn't change that dramatically from year to year, so count the count the preamp tubes. Is there one or two additional ECC83?

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              One additional ECC83 compared to a JMI-era top boost model. That's 6x ECC83 + 1x ECC82 total in the preamp.

                              Here are a few more pics 'as-received'

                              Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20170616_165404240.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	122.3 KB
ID:	845748Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20170616_170847273.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	113.6 KB
ID:	845755Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20170616_165501148.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	115.7 KB
ID:	845752Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20170616_165411581.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	108.9 KB
ID:	845749Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20170616_170856110.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	123.1 KB
ID:	845756Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20170616_170242173.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	117.5 KB
ID:	845753Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20170616_165416709.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	99.8 KB
ID:	845750Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20170616_170247477.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	120.2 KB
ID:	845754Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20170616_165421834.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	116.6 KB
ID:	845751
                              Last edited by Mick Bailey; 06-24-2017, 03:04 PM. Reason: typo

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X