I need a good tele neck pickup cover that wont suck the life out of the pickup. I have been beating my brains out the last few days trying to figure out why my tele neck pickups have been total shit, well dont ask why I didnt do it before but I decided to remove a cover and try it and what do you know, the tone is there just covered up by the cover. They were supposed to be good cover but I got duped by bad advertising. Wont mention where they came from. "stewmac-allparts" Ahem did I say that
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Anyone know about a tonally transparent cover
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by madialex View PostThey were supposed to be good cover but I got duped by bad advertising. Wont mention where they came from. "stewmac-allparts" Ahem did I say that
Here's something you might want to try... it wont look "vintage" correct, but if you have a cover you hate the tone of, try it out and see...
Make a slit in the cover from the top end all the way down to the open part. You can make it anywhere.. front, back, on a side. The idea is to prevent the cover from running all around the coil. This becomes a shorted loop and will mess the tone up.
Give it a try and see what you get.
Here's a quick illustration. The second picture is from a Rowe patent from 1968 illustrating the same thing.It would be possible to describe everything scientifically, but it would make no sense; it would be without meaning, as if you described a Beethoven symphony as a variation of wave pressure. — Albert Einstein
http://coneyislandguitars.com
www.soundcloud.com/davidravenmoon
-
The Guitar Jones Tele covers are very clear. I highly recommend them by far over any other covers I've tried.
But as Dave said, they still have SOME effect, and for that reason, the neck pu on my own Tele has no cover. For giggles and grins I even wrapped the coil in twine to match the bridge.
Comment
-
Originally posted by David Schwab View PostCovers change the tone, period. How much they change the tone is another matter. The thinner the better. Personally I don't think material has as much effect as the thickness.
Here's something you might want to try... it wont look "vintage" correct, but if you have a cover you hate the tone of, try it out and see...
Make a slit in the cover from the top end all the way down to the open part. You can make it anywhere.. front, back, on a side. The idea is to prevent the cover from running all around the coil. This becomes a shorted loop and will mess the tone up.
Give it a try and see what you get.
Here's a quick illustration. The second picture is from a Rowe patent from 1968 illustrating the same thing.
Hi Zhang, I may start doing them with just black cloth tape or string and only offer the cover with a note about the slit or I may be able to get some better covers. I am sort of in a re-tooling starting up thing and want to have all my shit together before selling anything on the open market. Unlike the past crap I have gone through.
Comment
-
Be VERY careful if you use Tele rhythm pickups without covers...
Many years ago, I had a 1962? Tele rhythm pickup on my 1968 Tele. I read somwhere that if you took the metal cover off a humbucking pickup, the pickup got brighter. I didn't like the dark tone of my Tele, so I removed the cover from the pickup and reinstalled the pickup. The tone change was amazing! The pickup was much brighter, clearer and more powerful... until I was strummin' along one day, and I caught the high E string on the edge of the bobbin. I pulled the top flat almost completely off the pickup, all the way to the A string.
I don't know if wrapping string around the pickup will work or not, string and wax is much softer than a steel string. Maybe you could try a plastic cover?
ken
Comment
-
Originally posted by ken View PostI don't know if wrapping string around the pickup will work or not, string and wax is much softer than a steel string. Maybe you could try a plastic cover?
ken
Is there any posibility of making a plastic clone of a tele neck cover?
I wrapped off a tele neck pickup recently, and i'm thinking how can I use it again. Maybe I'll try David's idea of cutting a bit the metal cover.
Greetings,
Ben
Comment
-
Originally posted by ken View PostBe VERY careful if you use Tele rhythm pickups without covers...
Many years ago, I had a 1962? Tele rhythm pickup on my 1968 Tele. I read somwhere that if you took the metal cover off a humbucking pickup, the pickup got brighter. I didn't like the dark tone of my Tele, so I removed the cover from the pickup and reinstalled the pickup. The tone change was amazing! The pickup was much brighter, clearer and more powerful... until I was strummin' along one day, and I caught the high E string on the edge of the bobbin. I pulled the top flat almost completely off the pickup, all the way to the A string.
But I am not my customers so I do provide them with the GJ cover, which is still very clear. (And I agree that the Stewmac covers are tone-killers...)
Comment
-
Thank you DS!
Originally posted by David Schwab View PostCovers change the tone, period. How much they change the tone is another matter. The thinner the better. Personally I don't think material has as much effect as the thickness.
Here's something you might want to try... it wont look "vintage" correct, but if you have a cover you hate the tone of, try it out and see...
Make a slit in the cover from the top end all the way down to the open part. You can make it anywhere.. front, back, on a side. The idea is to prevent the cover from running all around the coil. This becomes a shorted loop and will mess the tone up.
Give it a try and see what you get.
Here's a quick illustration. The second picture is from a Rowe patent from 1968 illustrating the same thing.
I cut the cover as the picture shows and it was a 100% improvement over not cutting it. The tone came back about 95% the highs are a little softer than without the cover but output is the same and I can live with it, this is the stewmac cover BTW.
I took another of the stewmac covers and used my dremel and ground all the way through and the cover is solid brass with chrome plating. The allparts seems to be the chrome plating, then a layer of copper looking stuff then nickel silver? The all parts cover with the cut in it was tonally like not even having it on, no difference at all between no cover and with the cover so I guess allparts has my vote as to what I will be getting, and stewmac covers in an emergency. Thanks again DS!!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Zhangliqun View PostWhat did you use to cut it?
Comment
-
One problem...
If you sell your pickups with your covers cut like this, you may be in violation of Rowe's patent. You might want to check on the status of this before you sell.
Ken
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dave Kerr View PostPrefaced by stating I'm in no way a patent lawyer, but a patent issued in 1968 shouldn't be a concern, should it?
It used to be 17 years from date of grant, but there was too much trouble with people gaming the system, by delaying the approval process by various strategms for ten or twenty years, while some industry grew, and then when the patent finally issued, going around ant threatening to shut whole industries down if the new patent owner were not paid off. In those days, it took something like 3 years to get a patent, so Congress changed the rule to 17+3= 20 years after filing.
Comment
-
It's not the original patent I was on about, but the reissued patent.
AFAIK Fender now owns Rowe/DeArmond, so it can't hurt to do some research and check up on the patent's status. Only takes a few minutes and can save your neck.
Seriously,
Ken
Comment
-
Originally posted by madialex View PostI cut the cover as the picture shows and it was a 100% improvement over not cutting it. The tone came back about 95% the highs are a little softer than without the cover but output is the same and I can live with it, this is the stewmac cover BTW.
Originally posted by madialex View PostThanks again DS!!
This should work with humbucker covers as well.It would be possible to describe everything scientifically, but it would make no sense; it would be without meaning, as if you described a Beethoven symphony as a variation of wave pressure. — Albert Einstein
http://coneyislandguitars.com
www.soundcloud.com/davidravenmoon
Comment
Comment