Music Electronics Forum

Go Back   Music Electronics Forum > Amplification > Guitar Amps > Maintenance, Troubleshooting & Repair

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-08-2006, 06:49 PM   #1
JC@
Senior Member
 
JC@'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 369
Peavey Special™ 112 Solo™ Series

I found something rare to me.
On this amp the thermal braker placed by the power transistor's is connected in a way that it's action is directly on the mains circuit. That is, when hot cuts the mains.

The fact is that if you tap on it, its resistance stops being zero so there's a horrible scartchy noise on the speaker. Maybe I should just bypass it. Too wrong? Or should I do the right thing and find one that is a bit more stiff and less sensible to vibrations?
JC@ is offline   Reply With Quote
...and now, a word from our sponsor:
Old 12-08-2006, 07:22 PM   #2
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4
A lot of earlier (~1980) PV amplifiers used that connection. Those thermal breakers only have one contact so it's easier to just pull the pin on the mains to cool things down and cope with various faults.

I'm not aware of getting crackles when you bash them, although it depends how hard you bash them. They use a bi-metal plate which pushes a set of contacts so it is possible that a hair-triggered unit might disconnect the power. Perhaps you need to replace it.
Rcubed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2006, 12:56 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Lansing, Michigan, USA
Posts: 10,366
First, that is a safety feature and not a good idea to remove, though during testing you certainly can bypass it. It prevents fires and also protects the power transistors from self-destructing.

Keep in mind that when you tap it, the vibrations also affect other parts in the area. Dismount the thermal and suspend it by its wires. Leave it connected. NOW tap on it - be aware of the voltage please - and see if it was really noisy or not. And ALSO tap on the chassis where the thing used to be mounted just to make sure nothing else was sensitive.
Enzo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2006, 06:20 PM   #4
JC@
Senior Member
 
JC@'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 369
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enzo View Post
And ALSO tap on the chassis where the thing used to be mounted just to make sure nothing else was sensitive.
It may have something else but that's more or less how I tested it.
With the amp unpluged and the DMM set to ohms and connected to both terminals of the sensor I tapped on it with a wooden tool and the reading went from zero to something else for a moment then back to zero. The DMM is a fast fluke.

I will test it with the sensor bypassed to see if there is any other sensitive part on the board, that's a good tip.
JC@ is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mesa MK series schemes, inaccuracies, anybody know? Joe N Theory & Design 4 10-20-2006 04:08 AM
12ax7 24vac series heaters? can you... stevesamps Theory & Design 2 09-15-2006 02:09 AM
Parallel vs. series vs. one filter cap Chris333 Theory & Design 4 08-29-2006 07:03 PM
Question on series/parallel in HSH guitar Lucky Guitar Tech 2 08-16-2006 02:38 PM
Only a series of tests, please ignore. Rob S Lobby 7 06-30-2006 09:26 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin   Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO