![]() |
| | #1 |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 369
| Peavey Special™ 112 Solo™ Series
I found something rare to me. On this amp the thermal braker placed by the power transistor's is connected in a way that it's action is directly on the mains circuit. That is, when hot cuts the mains. The fact is that if you tap on it, its resistance stops being zero so there's a horrible scartchy noise on the speaker. Maybe I should just bypass it. Too wrong? Or should I do the right thing and find one that is a bit more stiff and less sensible to vibrations? |
| | |
| ...and now, a word from our sponsor: |
| | #2 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4
|
A lot of earlier (~1980) PV amplifiers used that connection. Those thermal breakers only have one contact so it's easier to just pull the pin on the mains to cool things down and cope with various faults. I'm not aware of getting crackles when you bash them, although it depends how hard you bash them. They use a bi-metal plate which pushes a set of contacts so it is possible that a hair-triggered unit might disconnect the power. Perhaps you need to replace it. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2006 Location: Lansing, Michigan, USA
Posts: 10,366
|
First, that is a safety feature and not a good idea to remove, though during testing you certainly can bypass it. It prevents fires and also protects the power transistors from self-destructing. Keep in mind that when you tap it, the vibrations also affect other parts in the area. Dismount the thermal and suspend it by its wires. Leave it connected. NOW tap on it - be aware of the voltage please - and see if it was really noisy or not. And ALSO tap on the chassis where the thing used to be mounted just to make sure nothing else was sensitive. |
| | |
| | #4 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 369
| Quote:
With the amp unpluged and the DMM set to ohms and connected to both terminals of the sensor I tapped on it with a wooden tool and the reading went from zero to something else for a moment then back to zero. The DMM is a fast fluke. I will test it with the sensor bypassed to see if there is any other sensitive part on the board, that's a good tip. | |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Mesa MK series schemes, inaccuracies, anybody know? | Joe N | Theory & Design | 4 | 10-20-2006 04:08 AM |
| 12ax7 24vac series heaters? can you... | stevesamps | Theory & Design | 2 | 09-15-2006 02:09 AM |
| Parallel vs. series vs. one filter cap | Chris333 | Theory & Design | 4 | 08-29-2006 07:03 PM |
| Question on series/parallel in HSH guitar | Lucky | Guitar Tech | 2 | 08-16-2006 02:38 PM |
| Only a series of tests, please ignore. | Rob S | Lobby | 7 | 06-30-2006 09:26 PM |