Music Electronics Forum

Go Back   Music Electronics Forum > Amplification > Guitar Amps > Theory & Design

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-15-2009, 07:26 PM   #1
Member
 
Wonker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 23
Need some help with 2 problems

1. What is the total resistance of this network? This is a Parallel circuit right?
l
l
l
V



2.How do I figure out the gain of this Jung Multi Loop Preamp? I have no clue what this is?
l
l
l
V




I don't need the answers...just a really good walk through on how to get them.

Thanks
__________________
Gibson V + Seymour Duncan Hot P-90 =

Last edited by Wonker; 06-15-2009 at 07:42 PM.
Wonker is offline   Reply With Quote
...and now, a word from our sponsor:
Old 06-15-2009, 08:14 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Philadelphia suburbs
Posts: 366
In #1, is the 10 ohm resistor connected to ground or is the top signal in & the bottom (through the 10 ohm resistor) signal out? I assume it is a single ended signal and not balanced.

If the 10 Ohm resistor is the output, then the total series resitance in the circuit is just under 168 Ohms. In this scenario it is basically a series circuit with some elements in parallel with each other. the first 50 ohm is in parallel with the 1.5k reisitor. That = approx 48 Ohms. The way it is drawn, the next 50ohm is shunted out of the circuit altogether, ignore it. 100 Ohms in series = 148 Ohms total so far. 10 ohm + 10 Ohm (=20 Ohms) in parallel with a 20 ohm resistor. 20 // 20 = 10 ohms. Up to 158 Ohms. Another 10 ohms in series brings it up to 168 ohms.

Where is that from? Looks really odd. A larer clip of the schematic surrounding it would give better perspective on what was trying to be accomplished.

I could take a guess on #2 but I'd probably be wrong. What is the 2nd op amp? Another standard non-inverting stage or what? It only shows a single input. Looks more like a digital inverter.
cbarrow7625 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2009, 08:27 PM   #3
Member
 
Wonker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 23
Quote:
Originally Posted by cbarrow7625 View Post

Where is that from? Looks really odd. A larer clip of the schematic surrounding it would give better perspective on what was trying to be accomplished.
This is all they give you. I'm taking an open book pre test...and having a very hard time with it.

Thanks
__________________
Gibson V + Seymour Duncan Hot P-90 =
Wonker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2009, 08:34 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Philadelphia suburbs
Posts: 366
Good for you, using all of your resources. I thought that the diagrams looked susiciously like textbook stuff. In that case, my assesssment of #1 is almost certainly correct & it is 168.387 Ohms to be exact.

Good luck with the other one.
cbarrow7625 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2009, 08:42 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Philadelphia suburbs
Posts: 366
I don't know why, but I just looked up the answer for #2 (Google is an awsome thing). In a Jung multi-loop configuration, the inner loop is set to a very high gain to increase linearity & reduce distortion. The overall gain for the stage is set by the outer loop. In this case, the outer loop gain is figured just like any other non-inverting stage. It has an overall gain of "11".

I hope that is correct (insert disclaimer here).
cbarrow7625 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2009, 08:55 PM   #6
Member
 
Wonker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 23
Thanks for the help.

I have to do a test like this in the morning as part 2 of a job interview. This is what they gave me to prepare.

I'm freaking out
__________________
Gibson V + Seymour Duncan Hot P-90 =
Wonker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2009, 09:03 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Philadelphia suburbs
Posts: 366
Good Luck. There are tons calculators & written calculations on the web for all this stuff that can be really useful to brush up on your skills.

Just search for "op amp calculator" or "resistor network calculator" or "Thevenin / Norton Equivalent circuit calculator", etc. and you'll probably find more help than you know what to do with.
cbarrow7625 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2009, 07:19 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Lansing, Michigan, USA
Posts: 10,355
I'd agree at 168.4 ohms. Nitpicking here: you can;t extend the calculation to six digits, none of your terms have that many digits.

But the problem is basically simple, and they are finding out if you know how to calculate series and parallel resistances. Do you know how?

Look at the problem, the 50 ohm resistor is shorted across, so ignore it. The path through the network is through a 50 ohm and 1500 ohm in parallel (48.39 ohms), then through 100 ohms. Next through a paralleled 20 ohms and two 10 ohms in series. The two tens make 20 ohms, and that in parallel with the other 20 ohms makes 10 ohms. And finally another 10 ohms in series.

SO you have 48.39 , 100, 10, and 10 ohms in series. Adds up to 168.39, which we have to trim to four significant digits - 168.4
__________________
Education is what you're left with after you have forgotten what you have learned.
Enzo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2009, 07:40 AM   #9
Old Timer
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: pacific north west
Posts: 1,482
Hmmm...

I get 121.5
Chuck H is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2009, 07:49 AM   #10
Old Timer
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: pacific north west
Posts: 1,482
50 parallel with 1.5 is 1.456, omit the second 50 because of the jumper. Then the 100. Then 10 + 10 = 20 parallel with another 20 = 10. Then another 10.

1.456 + 100 + 10 + 10 = 121.456

Chuck
Chuck H is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2009, 08:12 AM   #11
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Italy
Posts: 993
Chuck,
no disrespect intended, but you probably missed that the 1.5 resistor has a K at its right, so paralleling it with the 50 Ohms resistor you get 48.38 Ohms.

The entire network's equivalent resistance is 168.38.... Ohms IMHO.

Cheers

Bob
__________________
Foolproof equipment is hard to design, because fools are VERY ingenious...
Robert M. Martinelli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2009, 08:22 AM   #12
Old Timer
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: pacific north west
Posts: 1,482
OK, good. I'd much rather be wrong than living in bizarro world. I thought everyone had gone funny. Glad it was just me.

Chuck
Chuck H is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2009, 10:48 AM   #13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Lansing, Michigan, USA
Posts: 10,355
Right, 1.5k - 1500 ohms.
__________________
Education is what you're left with after you have forgotten what you have learned.
Enzo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2009, 05:02 PM   #14
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 676
This is why I agitate for the 1k5 style notation. Harder to lose the decimal's position.
Don Moose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2009, 05:33 AM   #15
Old Timer
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: pacific north west
Posts: 1,482
I'm with Don. Though I never even considered it before

Actually, the way the 1.5k is marked is a bit goofy. Probably intentional since although there's nothing else it could mean it would be easy to misread on a glance. Which I did. So I guess I failed the test so to speak.

Of course it should have been indicated like this:
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Homework1b.JPG (53.5 KB, 2 views)
Chuck H is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2009, 12:30 AM   #16
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by cbarrow7625 View Post
(snippage) #2 In a Jung multi-loop configuration, the inner loop is set to a very high gain to increase linearity & reduce distortion.

The overall gain for the stage is set by the outer loop. In this case, the outer loop gain is figured just like any other non-inverting stage. It has an overall gain of "11".
Using this calculator:

Non-Inverting Op-Amp Resistor Calculator

I entered the following information.
R1 - 4 K ohms 1k + 3K
R2 = 1013 K ohms, 1M, +3k + 10K
V2 = 0
V1 = 1

Result:
Gain = 0
R2 = Nan
R4 = Nan
SyncTronX is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
peavy problems ibanez_RG350DX Maintenance, Troubleshooting & Repair 4 12-14-2008 09:58 AM
getter problems Wakculloch Tubes (Valves) 3 02-01-2008 12:54 AM
AC-30CC problems. JonL Maintenance, Troubleshooting & Repair 1 03-26-2007 07:42 PM
Crybaby problems gerry Guitar Effects 5 03-15-2007 05:50 PM
crybaby problems msclford Guitar Effects 10 02-04-2007 08:12 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin   Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO