Music Electronics Forum

Go Back   Music Electronics Forum > Amplification > Guitar Amps > Theory & Design

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-02-2009, 03:42 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 17
CF recovery stage - essential or not?

Hi folks!
Couple of questions here.

Question one: I am designing a preamp section, toying with using a cathode follower to drive tonestack. I have not done one before. Considered wisdom (according to initial internet searches) is that CF goes to tonestack, and then a "recovery stage" before heading off to PS. Is the recovery stage essential?

Question two: I have heard that with CF, one should elevate heater voltage. I was given a schematic of a Marshall Superbass as an example of a CF circuit. Looking at this schematic, I cannot see elevated heater - unless I am misreading the schematic which is possible, or then again it may be incomplete diagram. Or maybe the Superbass doesn't use elevated heater?
PositiveNegativeMan is offline   Reply With Quote
...and now, a word from our sponsor:
Old 10-02-2009, 04:17 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
defaced's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: York Pa
Posts: 619
It is likely anything regarding elevated heaters will be in the power supply part of the schem. Usually it's a simple voltage divider (1M/100K) coming off the screen node with a bypass cap (~10u) across the 100K resistor. The center tap, or artifical center tap of the heaters goes to the junction of the 1M/100K voltage divider.

The elevated heaters are used because the cathode of a CF is at a high DC voltage which can exceed the heater to cathode voltage spec of the tube. By elevating the DC voltage of the heaters, the voltage difference between the two is reduced.
__________________
-Mike
defaced is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2009, 05:42 PM   #3
Old Timer
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,921
In a Tweed Fender/Marshall etc with a CF driven tone stack, the only 12AX7 tube that follows the cathode follower, is the PI tube, which is necessary to supply out of phase signals to each half of the tubes driving the OT primary. If your preamp section was being mated with a push-pull output with it's own PI tube (or if building an SE version) you would not NEED a specific recovery triode.

The cathode follower is not essential to a guitar amp preamp, but it could be considered a big part of the Tweed Fender/classic Marshall character, it gives a degree of crunch and a mid character. Whether you use it or not depends on what flavour you're after...at the end of the day there are tricks to give the CF circuit a better mids scooped tone, and a plate driven tone stack (BF/SF Fender) a more "tweedy" tone...probably best to save yourself some work though and determine which character you're after before you start soldering.

Typically Fender/Marshall/Traynor didn't bother to elevate the heaters...neither do the vasty majority of builders who build amps based on this topology. A B+ supply of anything up to 400vdc (at least) at the CF stage (with a cathode voltage of well over 200vdc) seems to be perfectly reliable.
MWJB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2009, 09:23 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 212
Quote:
Typically Fender/Marshall/Traynor didn't bother to elevate the heaters...neither do the vasty majority of builders who build amps based on this topology. A B+ supply of anything up to 400vdc (at least) at the CF stage (with a cathode voltage of well over 200vdc) seems to be perfectly reliable.
Unfortunately some brands recent production tubes fail miserably in CF position /some of them go bad immediately/ which IMHO now makes elevating heaters mandatory especially if you're a manufacturer.
Mrashall weren't elevating heaters but their recent models are all elevated.
There's a thread on the subject here:

12AX7EH CF Failure
Gregg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2009, 10:14 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Old Tele man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 430
...it all depends upon what the impedance needs to be going into the stage after the tonestack.

...a CF stage typically has a LOW impedance, but great current gain, so it can drive just about ANY impedance tonestack.

...however, since all "lossy" tonestacks produce LOTS of signal attenuation, its sorta a two-edged question: (1) how much GAIN do I need to recover to drive the next stage, and (2) what impedance do I need to have that signal developed across.

...life ain't simple, and neither is tube circuit design.
__________________
...and the Devil said: "...yes, but it's a DRY heat!"
Old Tele man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2009, 02:21 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Silicon Valley ; USA
Posts: 450
Quote:
Originally Posted by PositiveNegativeMan View Post
Hi folks!
Couple of questions here.

Question one: I am designing a preamp section, toying with using a cathode follower to drive tonestack. I have not done one before. Considered wisdom (according to initial internet searches) is that CF goes to tonestack, and then a "recovery stage" before heading off to PS. Is the recovery stage essential?
The answer is : it depends... It depends on where the tone stack is in the circuit. Just look at other existing schematics, and do what they do.

Quote:
Originally Posted by PositiveNegativeMan View Post

Question two: I have heard that with CF, one should elevate heater voltage. I was given a schematic of a Marshall Superbass as an example of a CF circuit. Looking at this schematic, I cannot see elevated heater - unless I am misreading the schematic which is possible, or then again it may be incomplete diagram. Or maybe the Superbass doesn't use elevated heater?
If you look in the data sheet, it will tell you , for example, the peak heater to cathode voltage for a 12ax7 is listed as +/- 200 volts. However, it never hurts to elevate the heater voltage to match the CF cathode dc voltage level.

-g
__________________
______________________________________
Gary Moore
Moore Amplifiication
mooreamps@hotmail.com
mooreamps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2009, 10:19 AM   #7
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 17
Thanks for all the information / advice.
I have PT intended for use with bridge filter. So I take it I can drop some of the HT supply onto the heater circuit to raise the voltage?

I take it this means going to DC heaters?

Is there any advantage/disadvantage to raising the voltage in the whole heater circuit as opposed to just on the CF?

Has anybody ever included a section of circuit to switch in/out a cathode load/anode load and so making the triode switchable from a CF to a voltage gain stage? Sorry, probably a stupid question.
PositiveNegativeMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2009, 01:52 PM   #8
Lifetime Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,047
Let me confuse the issue some more.

A power MOSFET makes a good follower to drive tube stacks without using half a preamp tube.

See MOSFET Follies at GEOFEX.

I've used IRF820s for this, as they are really tough, but Zetex and Supertex now make TO-92 plastic pack MOSFETs in 1W dissipation and 500V drain rating that do the job too.

MOSFETs make good followers and as long as you're not listening for the distortion of overdriving a follower, they sound like a cathode follower (which means they have not much sound of their own at all.)

And a MOSFET is remarkably free of the need for elevating its heater voltage.
R.G. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2009, 02:56 PM   #9
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by MWJB View Post
Whether you use it or not depends on what flavour you're after...at the end of the day there are tricks to give the CF circuit a better mids scooped tone, and a plate driven tone stack (BF/SF Fender) a more "tweedy" tone...
What are those tricks that will change the tone of the cathode follower?
Kenny
KennyBB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2009, 09:21 AM   #10
Old Timer
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,921
"Unfortunately some brands recent production tubes fail miserably in CF position /some of them go bad immediately/ which IMHO now makes elevating heaters mandatory especially if you're a manufacturer.
Mrashall weren't elevating heaters but their recent models are all elevated.
There's a thread on the subject here:12AX7EH CF Failure " - Sure EH have built a sub standard tube in that respect (EH12AX&LPS spiral filament) my advice would be not to use that tube in a CF stage, every other tube works fine. If EH came out with a 6L6 that could only take 400v would it be the manufacturers responsibility to redesign all their amps, or would it make sense for the user to just avoid using them? You have plenty of other choices.
MWJB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2009, 01:05 PM   #11
Supporting Member
 
Steve Conner's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 2,985
Quote:
Originally Posted by PositiveNegativeMan View Post
Thanks for all the information / advice.
I have PT intended for use with bridge filter. So I take it I can drop some of the HT supply onto the heater circuit to raise the voltage?

I take it this means going to DC heaters?

Is there any advantage/disadvantage to raising the voltage in the whole heater circuit as opposed to just on the CF?

Has anybody ever included a section of circuit to switch in/out a cathode load/anode load and so making the triode switchable from a CF to a voltage gain stage? Sorry, probably a stupid question.
Yes. If you think about it, you should raise the heater circuit voltage to half of the CF's cathode voltage, not the full voltage. I leave it as an exercise to the reader to figure out why.

No, it doesn't mean going to DC heaters.

You can't easily raise the voltage on just one tube, unless you had two separate heater windings on your transformer.

Pass.
Steve Conner is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2009, 01:54 PM   #12
Old Timer
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,921
"Has anybody ever included a section of circuit to switch in/out a cathode load/anode load and so making the triode switchable from a CF to a voltage gain stage? Sorry, probably a stupid question." I haven't seen this done, but it seems feasible, as a cathode follower input would use 1 1/2 12AX7s you could use an unused triode as an input triode with the plate feeding your tone stack. Switch the input of the tone stack from the cathode of one tube to the plate of another. You could have the the volume control following the treble control on a SPST so that it is switched out of the circuit when in tweed mode, or switched in as a Marshall style master volume? A 1Meg bass pot would be overkill in plate driven tone stack, so you'd have to compromise 250K to 500K?

The plate fed stack would need an additional recovery stage to bump up the gain...so your tweed channel would end up with an extra stage...you could probably overcome that with a switched output that bypasses the last triode in tweed mode.

Seems a lot of work compared to using a traditional 2 channel tweed style preamp, with a mid scoop filter/different cathode resistor & cap values, to give one channel a more BF type tone, though (which is the more practical route).
MWJB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2009, 10:28 PM   #13
HTH
Senior Member
 
HTH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Newcastle (UK)
Posts: 360
Quote:
Originally Posted by PositiveNegativeMan View Post

Has anybody ever included a section of circuit to switch in/out a cathode load/anode load and so making the triode switchable from a CF to a voltage gain stage? Sorry, probably a stupid question.
I've seen this done before, but can't 100% recall where - I 'think' it was in a Peavey amp, maybe one of the newer ones like the JSX or something.
__________________
HTH - Heavier Than Hell
HTH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2009, 10:46 PM   #14
Senior Member
 
Old Tele man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 430
...the principle was sometimes used in "signal inversion" circuits...although as I recall, only the SELECTION was switched between Vk or Va...so, effectively, it was still a CK circuit with electronically selected output(s).
__________________
...and the Devil said: "...yes, but it's a DRY heat!"
Old Tele man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2009, 07:57 PM   #15
GCA
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by MWJB View Post
"Unfortunately some brands recent production tubes fail miserably in CF position /some of them go bad immediately/ which IMHO now makes elevating heaters mandatory especially if you're a manufacturer.
Mrashall weren't elevating heaters but their recent models are all elevated.
There's a thread on the subject here:12AX7EH CF Failure " - Sure EH have built a sub standard tube in that respect (EH12AX&LPS spiral filament) my advice would be not to use that tube in a CF stage, every other tube works fine. If EH came out with a 6L6 that could only take 400v would it be the manufacturers responsibility to redesign all their amps, or would it make sense for the user to just avoid using them? You have plenty of other choices.
The CF heaters should have been elevated in the first place in the amps that don't. They were saving money by not doing it and just getting away with it... now that there's a crop of tubes that die in there we have the situation where it comes back around to bite in the rear. About the 6L6's, tho... different story

As for me, I'd like people to be able to pop in any 12AX7/AU7 and go, so I elevate. It's not too hard to do.

To return to the original topic though, you only need the recovery stage if the gain suckage through the tone stack is too much in your opinion. I prefer to use the recovery personally because I like to see lots of tubes rather than just one or two
GCA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2009, 11:08 PM   #16
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 212
Quote:
Sure EH have built a sub standard tube in that respect (EH12AX&LPS spiral filament) my advice would be not to use that tube in a CF stage, every other tube works fine. If EH came out with a 6L6 that could only take 400v would it be the manufacturers responsibility to redesign all their amps, or would it make sense for the user to just avoid using them? You have plenty of other choices.
Unfortunately not only EH are dying as CF. You can't make an amp and say to the customer "The amp is OK but don't use this and that".

Quote:
As for me, I'd like people to be able to pop in any 12AX7/AU7 and go, so I elevate. It's not too hard to do.
+1

Quote:
The CF heaters should have been elevated in the first place in the amps that don't. They were saving money by not doing it and just getting away with it... now that there's a crop of tubes that die in there we have the situation where it comes back around to bite in the rear.
+1.

Quote:
If you think about it, you should raise the heater circuit voltage to half of the CF's cathode voltage, not the full voltage. I leave it as an exercise to the reader to figure out why.
I'm not very much into theory and I don't know why but I'm elevating mine at 80-90V which in my case is approx the half CF voltage. No casualties so far
Gregg is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
12AX7EH CF Failure GainFreak Tubes (Valves) 27 11-03-2009 02:17 PM
Using Op-amps as reverb driver / recovery PositiveNegativeMan Theory & Design 11 07-19-2009 05:08 AM
Crash Course on Guitar Effects: The Essential Guide for All Guitarists tboy Content 0 08-03-2008 09:32 PM
Essential changes for using 6L6's tom_kinki3 5 E 3 18 07-16-2007 04:07 PM
CF-driven phase inverter? AdmiralB Theory & Design 14 01-08-2007 01:36 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin   Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO