Music Electronics Forum

Go Back   Music Electronics Forum > Amplification > Guitar Amps > Theory & Design

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-11-2009, 11:32 AM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 12
Mesa GEQ Inductors - Gyrators

Hi guys,
I'll try to replace mesa inductors with gyrators, but I need some help:
1.Is the transistor emitter bias resistor fine(6.8K), or I should use another value?
2.Do I need to use dual voltage supply for the circuit?



Thanks

Last edited by mensur; 10-11-2009 at 12:58 PM.
mensur is offline   Reply With Quote
...and now, a word from our sponsor:
Old 10-13-2009, 12:46 AM   #2
Supporting Member
 
loudthud's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Texas USA
Posts: 921
I'm not sure you have the right form of gyrator. Doesn't the Mesa circuit have slide pots with series LC tanks to ground? Why does your circuit have In's and Out's? The circuits I've seen simulated the inductor to ground and the cap blocked DC so a split supply wasn't required. You just need to make sure the gyrators don't run out of current and that depends on how much signal the equalizer needs to handle.
__________________
WARNING! Musical Instrument amplifiers contain lethal voltages and can retain them even when unplugged. Refer service to qualified personel.
loudthud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2009, 01:09 AM   #3
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 12
Thank you, here is the complete schematic:

You telling me to use single voltage supply if I put inductors before the caps,or the caps will block DC anyway, so I can put gyrators directly to ground?
And what about Q-point resistors (100R's)?
mensur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2009, 06:45 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 142
The nodes you have labelled as "out" are not outputs. They should connect to reference voltage, equal to approximately half of the total power supply voltage. In dual supply circuits you can simply connect them to ground but if you use a single-rail supply and ground the emitters the nodes must connect to Vcc/2, most conveniently made by a resistive divider with the bottom resistor AC bypassed. Fortunately all gyrators can likely use the same DC reference to simplify the circuit.

As far as I know, these kinds of gyrator circuits need to have one end grounded. Since the circuit in the EQ is a series resonance circuit it's easy to arrange simply by changing the order of the components in the series string. For example, place the capacitors (connecting to ground in your schematic) before the gyrator inductors. The gyrators will ground the strings.

Last edited by teemuk; 10-13-2009 at 07:24 AM.
teemuk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2009, 10:10 AM   #5
Supporting Member
 
Steve Conner's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 2,990
Quote:
Originally Posted by teemuk View Post
As far as I know, these kinds of gyrator circuits need to have one end grounded.
Yes, they do. There's another gyrator circuit that allows both ends of the "inductor" to be floating, but it's much more complicated. It's not needed in this application anyway.

Look at RG Keen's EQ article to see how it all wires up.
Steve Conner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2009, 11:10 AM   #6
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 12
Thank you Teemu that's all I needed to know,
Here's V2 of the schematic:


Let me know please If i need to change something.

AND CAN USE 100R RESISTORS FOR THE Q-POINT?
mensur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2009, 11:21 AM   #7
Supporting Member
 
Steve Conner's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 2,990
Teemu might know better, but I think the 100R resistor will be OK as long as it's large compared to the transistor's internal emitter resistance. That's (26/Ic) ohms, or whatever. If it's not, you either need a bigger resistor, or more collector current.

You can make the same circuit with an op-amp follower instead of the transistor, it's easier to design because the op-amp is closer to an ideal follower. It may even take up less board space if you use quad op-amps.
Steve Conner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2009, 11:56 AM   #8
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 12
I know that its easier to design with op-amps but I don't like them, I want to make discrete gyrators.Can I put 1K's instead of 100R's and decrease 100nF's to the 10nF's, or out resistors (100K, 39K, 22K to 10K, 3.9K, 2.2K...)? The value of inductance will not change.
mensur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2009, 12:44 PM   #9
Supporting Member
 
Steve Conner's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 2,990
The inductance won't change, but the Q will decrease because of the added series resistance. That's probably why that point is called the Q point. The result will be that you'll get less dBs of boost/cut than if you'd used 100R.

I find a simulator like LTSpice very useful for simulating EQ circuits like this.
Steve Conner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2009, 09:30 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 212
Quote:
I'll try to replace mesa inductors with gyrators, but I need some help
I did this some time ago. Check out BA3812L's data sheet (or similar opamp EQs) and take the resistor values from there. Create a V/2 bias point for the base resistors and recalculate filter frequencies according to the formula.
I have a PCB image if you're interested. It was designed for 30mm travel slide pots to be soldered directly to the board but can be used with other pots as well.
Gregg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2009, 09:20 AM   #11
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 12
I searched the schematics of different GEQ's and I found that typical value for Q-point resistor is 330R, 470R on Op-amp based gyrators and 1K transistor based gyrator on DOD FX-40B. I found 100R on Rod Elliot's example of gyrator,so maybe he was just using it for easier calculations as a example.

What will change If
1.R1-Q-point-1K, R2-10K, C1-100nF?
2.R1-Q-point-1K, R2-100K, C1-10nF?
Inductance and frequency wont, but what will happen with signal,does it mean that gain will be smaller with 100K,because of larger series resistance?

Thanks guys.
mensur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2009, 11:33 AM   #12
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 212
Quote:
I searched the schematics of different GEQ's and I found that typical value for Q-point resistor is 330R, 470R on Op-amp based gyrators and 1K transistor based gyrator on DOD FX-40B. I found 100R on Rod Elliot's example of gyrator,so maybe he was just using it for easier calculations as a example.

What will change If
1.R1-Q-point-1K, R2-10K, C1-100nF?
2.R1-Q-point-1K, R2-100K, C1-10nF?
Inductance and frequency wont, but what will happen with signal,does it mean that gain will be smaller with 100K,because of larger series resistance?

Thanks guys.
Maybe this will answer your questions:

Guitar Pedals: Gyrator Filter Calculator
Gregg is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Toroidal inductors as crossover parts Chuck H Theory & Design 10 03-20-2009 06:46 AM
Inductors question blackrock Maintenance, Troubleshooting & Repair 3 02-14-2009 12:17 AM
Where to buy Inductors? clintronics Music Electronics 3 11-04-2007 12:41 PM
Power rating for Inductors Scorpion Music Electronics 6 07-25-2007 04:10 PM
wah inductors jeff Guitar Effects 3 02-04-2007 03:20 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin   Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO