![]() |
| | #1 |
| Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: minnesota
Posts: 50
| 4 7591 power tubes...
I have 2 amps that both use a pair of 7591 power tubes with various preamp tubes. I was wondering if there were any amps that have been made that use 4 7591 power tubes. I looked and all I found was some old fisher hi-fi stereos that used them. I really like the sound of the 7591 tube, as opposed to a 6L6 quad, or an EL84 quad. But the amps that I have found that use 7591's seem to put out at most, like 30 watts, and I really would like to have like 50+ watts. Is there something inherent about the 7591 tube that disallows it to be used in a quad? what's up with that? |
| | |
| ...and now, a word from our sponsor: |
| | #2 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Wernersville, PA
Posts: 747
| Parallel tubes
I would not think the tube itself would care how many you use in parallel The circuit itself would. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: California, USA
Posts: 676
|
There is nothing inherent about the 7591 tube that disallows it to be used in a quad. It is just from an era where the designer would change to another tube type if power output in the 50 watt region was desired.
|
| | |
| | #4 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 205
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #5 | |
| Member Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 82
| Quote:
Hammond use them in a few of their later designs. | |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Wernersville, PA
Posts: 747
| 7591 heaven
I have two pairs of these 7591 tubes in my Fisher 800-B. I think it is a synergy thing. Fisher- 7591. This amp sounds |
| | |
| | #7 | |
| Member Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 103
| Quote:
![]() The power output of tubes is a function of the ability of tube to handle voltage on its plate and current. Link to the Tube Data Sheet for the 7591A: http://www.tubezone.net/pdf/7591.pdf The tube was very popular in the mid-60s because of increased power handling / cleaner tone v. 6V6s; Ampeg, Gibson, Guild, Audio Guild ... many others made 7591 amps ... usually 25-30 watts for push/pull twins. I don't know of any other quad 7591 designs. CJ | |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1
| 7591
From my experience, the 7591 is not a great choice for a guitar amplifier; it's a hi-fi tube. My McIntosh 225 sounds fantastic running a quad of the 7591, but my Ampeg J-12 (2 x 7591) sounds too clean & simply won't break up like a 6V6-powered Fender will.
|
| | |
| | #9 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: California, USA
Posts: 676
| Understood but it's not just the power tube itself but the whole amp circuit that determines breakup.
|
| | |
| | #10 |
| Member Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Syracuse, NY
Posts: 61
|
I love the 7591 in a guitar amp. Hilgen used them and they sounded like a cranked Marshall at low volumes. Gibson used them too and they had a pretty sweet tone. I'm in the process of building an amp based on that tube. Jerry |
| | |
| | #11 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2006 Location: Cornelius, Oregon
Posts: 669
| Quote:
Greg | |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Junior Member Join Date: May 2009 Location: Pacific Grove
Posts: 18
| Audio Guild
Cap'n Juan: neat to see an Audio Guild. I found one up here in Aptos about 15 or 20 years ago. I played it around town in No SD County for a while....really liked it. I remember it had an extra 'chamber' in the cab [since some models had another speaker], a wonderful tremelo, and those softer 'toney' 7591s. I eventually sold it down in Escondido, where I lived then. |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Lifetime Member Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,051
|
The 7591 was a late-design tube, intended for more compact hifi equipment, which it was designed into, the biggest user being Fisher. It has the power abilities (mostly) of 6L6, at least the smaller-envelope ones, and a high transconductance/sensitivity. Nice tube. There is a gotcha. There were never a lot of these made, as the solid state revolution happened before they could ever get cranked up into lots of equipment and fill the service market lines. As a result, they are rare-ish. Worse yet, the Japanese hifi market liked them, and the new/old stock got bought up from the USA in the 70s and 80s. So they're harder to find. The Russian factories made "7591s" which were re-bottled 5881s; lower sensitivity, but it fit the same socket. They do NOT fit the same socket as the other power tubes we normally use. Be very aware that if you find "NOS" 7591s, they may be counterfeit, or the rebottled 5881s. Or real. You never know. |
| | |
| | #14 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2006 Location: Cornelius, Oregon
Posts: 669
| Quote:
I heard somewhere....maybe it was VTV....that at some point RCA took a whole warehouse of 7591A's and dumpstered them....since they were a cheap tube back in the day and the solid state revolution was in full swing, and this did a lot to make the prices go up. Greg | |
| | |
| | #15 | |
| Lifetime Member Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,051
| Quote:
However, the 7591 was a very refined bit of tubemaking art. So it would be interesting ( if one was going to use 7591s on more than a onesy basis ) to get some of these and really do the comparison against the old 7591 specs. In particular, EH didn't make any tubes back when I was tracking this; they bought Russian tubes and custom branded, this from the "sovtek" era. Maybe they have bought their own tube making capacity by now. I haven't followed it. The "slightly too big, may not fit in all spaces for the 7591" was the hallmark of the re-pinned 5881 in the day, so some caution is needed. Before I believed anything on the internet about a slightly too big 7591, I'd do the testing. JJ does have the technology to make a 7591, perhaps even to make a consistently good one. Anything is possible; but verify the "internet facts" before you bet any money or reputation on it. | |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: California, USA
Posts: 676
|
I've has good luck with the JJs. I have not tested all the characteristics of the JJs but they do seem to bias up similar to old USA 7591s. It's a shame that current distributors take such liberties with the tube models they market. A pet peve of mine is how they ignore things like such as size requirements which, after all, are one of the specifications for a given tube type. This really comes to light with the 7591 when you try to replace the power tubes in something like a Scott receiver. The JJ will fit even though it is oversize but the Sovtek is way too large. |
| | |
| | #17 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2006 Location: Cornelius, Oregon
Posts: 669
| Quote:
Greg | |
| | |
| | #18 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 205
| Quote:
Time was when the EIA was the RMA and they were issuing standard specifications, if a tube maker wanted to put a part number on a tube it had to be qualified and substantiated that it met a given RMA specification-and that's why nobody had any heartburn in, for example, Sylvania making up an order with GE tubes that were relabeled. That's why you could drop an RCA in a socket that was built with a Hytron and never have a moment's doubt about the propriety of what you were doing. However, RG, standardization to achieve equivalency is not the same thing as "It'll work OK and the pinout's right." And unless a tube is qualified and traceable to a standard specification like an RMA/RETMA/EIA published specification, any label you put on it such as "STR" or "Special low noise 12AX7 Gold Series" or 7591X etc etc etc-well, all you know is that they're close enough to work in a socket. And that's ALL you know. Let's consider the dimensional aspect of tube pins, for example, and what that meant when a certain offshore manufacturer shipped a load of tubes with undersize pins a few years ago....although the military specification for octal tube sockets and pins is commonly available. Lack of standardization and conformity to anything more than "Mike says it'll work-ship 'em out." Now...the situation has improved over the past few years but it's still not the same thing. | |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| #42 power tubes? | distorto | Conversions | 2 | 08-17-2009 06:43 AM |
| Noisy power tubes | Prairie Dawg | Tubes (Valves) | 2 | 04-30-2009 04:07 AM |
| JJ-7591 Special Considerations? | Tiago | Theory & Design | 20 | 04-30-2008 04:08 AM |
| Which power tubes to use? | Lizard King | Build Your Amp | 1 | 01-13-2008 04:55 AM |
| Ampeg rewire 7591 to accept 6L6's | tuberattler | Mods & Tweeks | 12 | 10-10-2007 05:58 AM |