Results 1 to 13 of 13
Like Tree2Likes
  • 1 Post By rjb
  • 1 Post By big_teee

Thread: Tightening Up Attack

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    6

    Question Tightening Up Attack

    First post, be gentle. I've wound up my first handful pickups. I need some tips on tightening attack. I've made two different styles of pickups both sound pretty good, but the attack is not at tight as I'd like. Even though they are different builds they have the same issue. I tried them through my Plexi clone and a Friedman HBE.

    Do I need to: wind a little tighter or wind neater? = lower inductance = brighter attack? On both I tried for 75 TPL to the best of my ability. I think they are wound decently tight, the coils are firm and do not bow out in the middle.

    Pickup 1:
    53mm bobbins
    Elektrisola P155, 42awg
    A2, 430ish gauss
    1022 slug, 5950 turns, 4.81k
    1018 screw, 5650 turns, 4.63k
    6.1H @ 120Hz
    5.8H @ 1kHz

    Pickup 2:
    53mm bobbin
    Elektrisola P155, 43awg
    A5, 690ish gauss
    1022 slug, 6500 turns, 7.21k
    1018 screw, 6500 turns, 7.30k
    7.4H @ 120Hz
    6.9H @ 1kHz

  2. #2
    rjb
    rjb is offline
    Old Timer
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Somewhere near Bawlmer, Merlin
    Posts
    2,198
    Quote Originally Posted by radrobgray View Post
    Do I need to: wind a little tighter or wind neater?
    I'm no expert, but I'd say wind a little less.

    "Vintage" PAF wind is considered ~5000 turns/coil, ~3.8H @1kHz.
    Some like fewer turns for neck, more for bridge: say ~4750 turns neck, ~5500 turns bridge.
    With inductance much over 5H, loaded resonant frequency goes down to Sludgeville.
    Try being a bit more conservative in varying from a classic formula.

    Don't worry- the folks who actually know what they're talking about should be here soon.

    -rb

    PS: You didn't mention baseplates or covers. A brass cover can ruin your day.
    Last edited by rjb; 02-07-2018 at 12:40 AM.
    mozz likes this.
    In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is deemed mad.

  3. #3
    ToneOholic! big_teee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Mid-South USA
    Posts
    9,834
    Welcome!
    It being 53mm I presume Bridge? Those turn counts should work for bridge pickups.
    Is it possible you just need to raise the pickup, or raise the poll pieces a bit?
    A picture of the pickup in the guitar would be nice.
    T
    ++Not an answer to the question, but if you care to experiment?
    The less the tpl, the larger the coil, the larger the coil, the futher the wire is from the poles and magnetic field.
    Try a 42 SP pickup with higher tpl, this might brighten and tighten the attack?
    Let us know how it turns out.
    Last edited by big_teee; 02-07-2018 at 12:15 AM.
    Chuck H likes this.
    Technicians Run the World, but Bankers, Lawyers, and Accountants, Take All The Credit!
    Keep Rockin! B_T
    Terry

  4. #4
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    6
    Quote Originally Posted by big_teee View Post
    Welcome!
    It being 53mm I presume Bridge? Those turn counts should work for bridge pickups.
    Is it possible you just need to raise the pickup, or raise the poll pieces a bit?
    A picture of the pickup in the guitar would be nice.
    T
    ++Not an answer to the question, but if you care to experiment?
    The less the tpl, the larger the coil, the larger the coil, the futher the wire is from the poles and magnetic field.
    Try a 42 SP pickup with higher tpl, this might brighten and tighten the attack?
    Let us know how it turns out.
    Correct, bridge pickups. I have the pickups 1/8"-3/16" from the string. What is a "higher" TPL? I did 75ish should I shoot for 100? I wound another set of the pickup #1 I managed to lower the inductance to 5.9H @ 120Hz. I still need to try it out though.
    20180206_194942.jpg
    Last edited by radrobgray; 02-07-2018 at 04:01 AM. Reason: add photo

  5. #5
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    6
    Quote Originally Posted by rjb View Post
    I'm no expert, but I'd say wind a little less.

    "Vintage" PAF wind is considered ~5000 turns/coil, ~3.8H @1kHz.
    Some like fewer turns for neck, more for bridge: say ~4750 turns neck, ~5500 turns bridge.
    With inductance much over 5H, loaded resonant frequency goes down to Sludgeville.
    Try being a bit more conservative in varying from a classic formula.

    Don't worry- the folks who actually know what they're talking about should be here soon.

    -rb

    PS: You didn't mention baseplates or covers. A brass cover can ruin your day.
    I'm trying out a few EVH style winds. Basically the first pickup is a 78 and the second is a Super Distortion with an A5. No covers normal nickel silver baseplate material. They aren't flubby or loose, they just aren't tight and punchy in the initial treble attack.

  6. #6
    ToneOholic! big_teee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Mid-South USA
    Posts
    9,834
    Since I am a hand winder, and don't use any auto traverse, I lay the wire down by hand, I guess on TPL.
    I would think 90-100 tpl sounds about right.
    I would also wind the coils tight, but without stretching.
    On my Frankie coils, I use 50mm bobbins.
    I wind somewhere around 6000-6100 turns on slug, and 5800-5850 on screw coil.
    A2 magnets at full gauss.
    If you have several different magnets, I would swap through them, and try different gauss levels.
    GL,
    T
    Last edited by big_teee; 02-07-2018 at 05:44 AM.
    Technicians Run the World, but Bankers, Lawyers, and Accountants, Take All The Credit!
    Keep Rockin! B_T
    Terry

  7. #7
    Supporting Member Chuck H's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    pacific north west
    Posts
    12,450
    I wouldn't discount the notion of mismatching the coils a little. For very little added noise you can really open up the tone. I have to wonder just how precise the old Gibson pickup coils matched. Pretty close was probably fine as far as a manufacturer was concerned. And they weren't using digital counters
    "So I acquired it for the purpose of fixing it up - in case I run out of things to do with the rest of my life..." tubeswell

    "...less ear-friendly but handy for jazz." Leo_Gnardo

    "Shut up, you big dumb poopy-head!" Justin Thomas

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    90
    If all else fails, remove the 1022 slugs and put soft ferrites there as I did.

    But try everything else first! (hey, did anyone ask about the potentiometer values?)

  9. #9
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    6
    Quote Originally Posted by darkfenriz View Post
    If all else fails, remove the 1022 slugs and put soft ferrites there as I did.

    But try everything else first! (hey, did anyone ask about the potentiometer values?)
    CTS 500k on both guitars. Pickup #1 is in a guitar with only a volume. Pickup #2 is in an HS with a master volume and tone.

  10. #10
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    6
    Quote Originally Posted by Chuck H View Post
    I wouldn't discount the notion of mismatching the coils a little. For very little added noise you can really open up the tone. I have to wonder just how precise the old Gibson pickup coils matched. Pretty close was probably fine as far as a manufacturer was concerned. And they weren't using digital counters
    Pickup #1 is offset by 300 winds. Which seems inline with the suggestions above.

  11. #11
    Supporting Member Chuck H's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    pacific north west
    Posts
    12,450
    Have you used other pickups in the same guitars with the same amps that gave you better performance? This is along the lines of what darkfenris mentioned about pot value (which would change the resonant peak). That is, it's difficult to know if the pickups you made are under performing without a base line. You said:

    "but the attack is not at tight as I'd like. Even though they are different builds they have the same issue. I tried them through my Plexi clone and a Friedman HBE"

    But that doesn't tell us the pickups alone are responsible. Another guitar with another pickup doesn't count either. It would have to be the same guitars and amps you're testing your pickups with to know that your pickups are actually under performing in this quality you're after.
    "So I acquired it for the purpose of fixing it up - in case I run out of things to do with the rest of my life..." tubeswell

    "...less ear-friendly but handy for jazz." Leo_Gnardo

    "Shut up, you big dumb poopy-head!" Justin Thomas

  12. #12
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    6
    Quote Originally Posted by Chuck H View Post
    Have you used other pickups in the same guitars with the same amps that gave you better performance? This is along the lines of what darkfenris mentioned about pot value (which would change the resonant peak). That is, it's difficult to know if the pickups you made are under performing without a base line. You said:

    "but the attack is not at tight as I'd like. Even though they are different builds they have the same issue. I tried them through my Plexi clone and a Friedman HBE"

    But that doesn't tell us the pickups alone are responsible. Another guitar with another pickup doesn't count either. It would have to be the same guitars and amps you're testing your pickups with to know that your pickups are actually under performing in this quality you're after.
    I tried the pickups in both guitars through the same amp rig. Previously the guitars had the same pickup builds, but made by a pro winder. I'll try a higher tpl and see what happens.

  13. #13
    ToneOholic! big_teee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Mid-South USA
    Posts
    9,834
    When I first started winding about 10 years back, I used to break wire a lot, winding by hand.
    Took a while to get it all worked out.
    One thing I noticed when I wound that tight, was good attack and great pick harmonics.
    Without the breaking, try winding tighter, with more tpl and see if it makes any difference!
    I added some calculated trembucker data.
    T
    **Also according to your picture, I've found that a tremolo guitar is usually not as hot or have as much sustain, as a fixed bridge guitar, especially if it has a bolt on neck.
    But, with a large tremelo block, they usually sound pretty good.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails screenshot-2018-02-07-15-14-32.png   screenshot-2018-02-07-15-16-22.png  
    Last edited by big_teee; 02-07-2018 at 10:21 PM.
    Technicians Run the World, but Bankers, Lawyers, and Accountants, Take All The Credit!
    Keep Rockin! B_T
    Terry

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Tightening pot shafts? Any tips?
    By olddawg in forum Guitar Tech
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 01-07-2017, 10:04 AM
  2. tightening up BF Princeton reverb ?
    By Bluefinger in forum Mods & Tweaks
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 08-17-2014, 09:53 PM
  3. Neck Pickup Attack
    By bea in forum Pickup Makers
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 07-15-2014, 02:32 AM
  4. Tool for Tightening Knurled Nut?
    By ArtB in forum Guitar Tech
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-22-2008, 01:20 PM
  5. Help For an Attack Decay pedal
    By Ludodiyer in forum Guitar Effects
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-25-2007, 04:23 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •