Music Electronics Forum

Go Back   Music Electronics Forum > Amplification > Guitar Amps

Guitar Amps General discussion about amps

Reply

 

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-28-2007, 07:22 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 941
2 Tubes fixed bias/2 tubes cathode bias

Hi all,
Working on Twin Reverb... 4 6L6s. I'm trying to figure out a way to have 2 tubes fixed bias and 2 tubes cathode bias. I think I'll need to split each of the phase inverter signals into 2 signals in order to separate the bias voltage from the cathode biased signal. Does anyone know how I could do this w/o tainting the signal?

Thanks!
lowell is online now   Reply With Quote
...and now, a word from our sponsor:
Old 11-28-2007, 08:38 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Philadelphia suburbs
Posts: 364
The easiest way to do that would be to run two seperate coupling caps off of each half of the phase inverter. One cap on each side would go to your 220K grid resistor to ground (cathode biased side) and the other cap would go to a different set of 220K grid resistors that have a junction at the existing bias circuit.

The 2nd coupling cap would block the DC bias from getting to the power tube grids on the cathode biased side.

This does require some comprimises & requires you to make some decisions & tweaks based on listening to the amp. By splitting each phase inverter output 2 ways, you are going to be halving the load each half of the phase inverter sees. Instead of each side of the phase inverter running into a single 220K resistor, it is now running into a pair of 220K resistors that are essentially in parallel (110k ohms). Have you ever changed the power tube grid resistors in a Fender amp to 110K? Does it make much difference on the sound? Well, what we do know is that you will change the LF roll-off frequency somewhat but not drastically. Loading down the output of the phase inverter with half the value of resistor usually does sound different though (to me it ends upsounding more constricted with less voltage swing & headroom).

You could compensate for that by increasing all of the 220K resistors to 470k to get the load on the phase inverter & the LF roll off back to where you started. But how will the power tubes like having 470K grid leak resistors? I don't know. They may like it just fine or it may cause premature power tube failure when running at high volume levels. Those resistors are usually kept fairly low in value...Anybody have a bead on that one? I would guess that it would probably be fine. However, will it affect the tone? Maybe a comprimise of 330K power tube grid resistors would be the best solution.

So, splitting the signal for a mixed fixed / cathode biased scheme is not too tough. The tough thing is making sure you know what trade-offs you are making and how (and where) to adjust for them if you are trying to keep or acheive a particular tone.

Sounds like fun. I've wanted to do that mod myself but never have. I have an amp that i can switch to fixed on one side & cathode on the other & I like that a lot. Let us know how it comes out. I expect it will be pretty nice.

Chris
cbarrow7625 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2007, 09:36 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 941
Chris,
Awesome thanks for the info. Yeah I forgot that simply adding 2 more caps would block the DC bias voltage... nice. I will try w/ the 330k's, sounds like the best compromise at this point. I want to have some warm sponginess/sustain of the cathode bias but also still would like to keep some of the headroom.

Thanks!
lowell is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2007, 12:48 AM   #4
Old Timer
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,256
Heres a simpler way to accomplish a similar effect.Leave the bias set-up the way it is.Put a 100ohm resistor on each pair of cathodes to ground instead of grounding each cathode.I used this on a 2x6L6GC parallel SE output.You will have to tweak the bias voltage and try different value cathode resistors.I ended up with a 120 ohm cathode resistor.Sounds pretty good,and a lot easier than adding coupling caps etc.
stokes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2007, 01:01 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 941
Yeah that's definitely simpler... I guess now I'm curious if mixing all four tubes biasing versus 2 cathode bias and 2 fixed... I wonder if both create the same dynamic and sonic results... anyone??

Thanks
lowell is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2007, 02:04 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 383
...you could DOUBLE the size of the separate 1500-ohm grid resistors (if used) since they'll be effectively in parallel (per side), if you want to "keep" same tonal effects as existing circuit.

...conversely, you could HALF the size of the two BIAS isolation resistors, since now they'd been working into half as many tubes.
__________________
...and the Devil said: "...yes, but it's a DRY heat!"
Old Tele man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2007, 03:07 AM   #7
Old Timer
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,256
Quote:
Originally Posted by lowell View Post
Yeah that's definitely simpler... I guess now I'm curious if mixing all four tubes biasing versus 2 cathode bias and 2 fixed... I wonder if both create the same dynamic and sonic results... anyone??

Thanks
Dont quite get what you are getting at here.With my suggestion you are using all 4 tubes in a sort of hybrid fixed/cathode bias thing.Fender did it on some amps during the BF to SF transition.Dont remember which amp I saw it on,think it may have been an early SF Bassman head I did some work on some time ago.
stokes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2007, 07:58 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 941
What I'm going for is not 4 tubes w/ mixed bias. I'm going for 2 tubes cathode bias and 2 tubes fixed. Not sure if this will be sonically similar to 4 w/ mixed. Make sense? I see what you're saying about mixing all 4. One reason being that I swapped out 2 of the 6L6 w/ 6V6 and would like the 6V6 to be fixed bias and the 6L6 to be cathode.
lowell is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2007, 01:04 AM   #9
Old Timer
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,256
Okay,I see where you are going now.I cant comment on how it will work sonically.But I think if you do it as you describe you may want to have one 6V6 and one 6L6 on one side of the OT and one and one on the other side.If you were to put a pair of 6V6's as a pair on one side of the OT and then a pair of 6L6's as a pair on the other side you will have a big mismatch between the two sides of the OT.If you put a cathode biased 6L6 and a fixed bias 6V6 on one side of the OT,and the same on the other side you will have a more balanced output.See what I mean?
stokes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2007, 10:28 AM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 941
Yes! My plan exactly... you're very right that it'd be unbalanced the other way. This silverface twin is sounding killer already!! I converted to cathode bias, tubes are at around 36ma per tube, doubled the tone stack slope resistor to 200k (reduced bass a bit), and have converted 2 6L6s to simulated triode mode. I will be chaining both channels together so vibrato can be used in channel one also, this will also put both channels in phase w/ eachother making it easy to daisy the channels to use all gain stages and tone stacks. I will possible be substituting 12ay7s for the 1st 2 tubes... we'll see. I'm thinking about lowering the preamp voltages for a more tweed dynamic response.

Lowell
lowell is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2007, 08:25 PM   #11
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Germantown, MD
Posts: 59
The grid reference resistor can be much higher with cathode bias. So if you stay with 220K on the fixed bias tubes and use 470K on the cathode bias tubes you will not increase the load on the PI by as much. You will want to go to smaller coupling caps for the cathode biased pair to keep the same time constant.

DG
DirtyGeorge is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads

Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
6V6s - cathode bias versus fixed bias question... HTH Guitar Amps 6 01-22-2008 08:05 PM
How To get Fixed Bias when you Don't Have a Bias Tap bob p Theory & Design 49 07-20-2007 12:00 AM
New tubes and bias but loud hum birthcontrolrocknroll Maintenance, Troubleshooting & Repair 17 03-23-2007 01:52 PM
6V6 cathode-bias level & tube idle-bias... In The Light Theory & Design 2 02-12-2007 03:56 PM
5F2A To Fixed Bias Morgan Debugging Your Build 6 08-21-2006 08:23 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin   Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO