![]() |
| | #1 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 132
| Fixed bias question. Quote:
![]() What I notice here is that the positive rail goes to the anode, and the negative to the cathode. This has to happen, because electrons flow from the cathode to the anode; a pentode still acts like a diode, reversing polarity simply will not work. Now, my negative power source is common to ground. Where the hell do I get a negative voltage with respect to the cathode, without dropping a resistor under the cathode? It looks like if I want to do this, I need to apply a positive voltage to the cathode... i.e., drop a small positive rail right on the cathode, using a zener to limit voltage and a resistor to limit current so I'm only shorting a couple microamps to ground/common (wtf?). Then I can fixed-bias the amp by referencing the grid to ground with a trim pot at (I guess) R5. ... what the hell? This looks like complicated brain damage. Cathode bias seems much simpler. | |
| | |
| ...and now, a word from our sponsor: |
| | #2 |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: Los Gatos, CA
Posts: 158
| Cathode bias is simpler.
Most fixed-bias amps either have a separate winding to generate the negative bias voltage, or they use a center-tapped plate winding with only two diodes (perhaps a tube rectifier) instead of a bridge, and the center tap grounded. They tap a bit of the large negative excursions of one of the ends of the plate winding to generate a negative voltage.
|
| | |
| | #3 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 132
|
This seems overcomplicated and pointless, except that it leaves the cathode more negative than cathode biasing and so would probably generate more current flow. Cathode biasing seems fair and simple.
|
| | |
| | #4 |
| Supporting Member Join Date: May 2006 Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 2,954
|
You are right. Cathode bias does more or less the same as fixed bias, but it's simpler and uses fewer components. However, it isn't used in higher powered amps because the cathode resistor has to dissipate a lot of heat. (if you cathode biased a SVT, think about 60 watts!) At some size of amp, the cost of the large resistor gets more than the cost of the extra parts for fixed bias. There's also the factor that you can get more power from a given tube lineup with fixed bias.
__________________ "Ohhhh miracle bulb shines feebly" |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 439
| |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: Los Gatos, CA
Posts: 158
| There are a few side-effects from cathode biasing.
If you leave out the capacitor around the cathode resistor, you'll reduce gain a bit and increase linearity due to the negative feedback induced by the resistor. If you put a big capacitor in parallel, creating a virtual ground at the cathode, this doesn't happen, and simulation with sine-waves looks good, with little difference from fixed bias. Transients in actual musical content do get distorted a bit, as the cap charges or discharges, temporarily changing output current. These effects don't necessarily sound bad, and cathode biasing has been used successfully in many great sounding guitar amps, with the advantage that you don't even have to think about re-biasing when you change tubes unless you change tube types. |
| | |
| | #7 | |
| Supporting Member Join Date: May 2006 Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 2,954
|
+1 on all that. I think a lot of people swear by those "transients... getting distorted", it's almost like having a vari-mu compressor built in to your amp. Nevertheless, there is a point in amp size and power beyond which everyone goes to fixed bias. The biggest cathode-biased amp I can think of just now would be the one in the Leslie speaker with its two 6550s. Quote:
__________________ "Ohhhh miracle bulb shines feebly" | |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Lifetime Member Join Date: May 2006 Location: Wise, Virginia
Posts: 624
|
BF, To elaborate on Steve's response note that the schemo you provided included a pot (wired as a rheostat) to adjust output tube bias - have you priced high dissipation (wattage) pots? Imagine trying to set the individual output tube bias on something like the mentioned SVT using large power resistors with sliding taps - you'd need a separate chassis just for the cathode resistors. Not to mention that potentiometers deteriorate in DC use and get noisy. And as far as parts count you've got a pot and a bypass cap - with some fixed setups you've got a diode, a voltage dropping resistor/cap, and a filter cap - not a whole lot more. In general I guess I like the control of circuit parameters that fixed bias gives me more than cathode bias - but then again you probably like ketchup on your hotdogs <grin>. Rob |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Combination cathode bias and fixed bias | tubeswell | Theory & Design | 49 | 05-30-2008 07:47 AM |
| Fixed Bias? | cherokee747 | Maintenance, Troubleshooting & Repair | 4 | 01-28-2008 11:02 PM |
| 6V6s - cathode bias versus fixed bias question... | HTH | Guitar Amps | 6 | 01-22-2008 08:05 PM |
| Cap bypassed cathode bias vs fixed bias? | Hardtailed | Theory & Design | 4 | 01-18-2008 08:39 AM |
| 5F2A To Fixed Bias | Morgan | Debugging Your Build | 6 | 08-21-2006 08:23 AM |