Hello all
I too am having a chorus related problem with a JC-120,
the vib.works fine but the chorus effect is inop with the toggle switch in chorus mode.This particular JC 120 uses the MN3007 BBD (bucket brigade device) and the MN3101 clock generator .I have been searching the internet for day's in hopes of finding the theory of how the circuit functions,where the circuit picks off the dry signal and where the dry and chorus signals mix.I have the schematic but I'm having a hard time figureing out the signal path.
Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Early JC-120: chorus works, controls don't - help?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by teemuk View Post
But anyway, someone should really make a dedicated site about these amps.
I feel like a real goober for looking so hard to solve a problem that was actually a feature. . .
Leave a comment:
-
I think the problem is that there are so many JC-series amplifiers and so many revisions of them. Someone should make a fan site with compiled service info, manuals and model/revision information according to serial numbers. Those revisions are, by the way, stated in the form of JC-120-XX where the XX is a letter code that marks the revision. This thing should be found from the badge at the rear. Some of the revisions are very different from one another - and I don't just mean the addition of the FX loop. Most differences you can't see unless you sketch out the circuit or you're shown the circuit diagram.
Now, the basic JC-120 has a fixed chorus, like this:
The dial reads: “VIBRATO-OFF-CHORUS”. But without manual it is indeed quite impossible to realize that the controls affect the vibrato only and that the chorus settings are fixed. In some revisions the selector was a rocker switch instead. Like in this older specimen:
However, the chorus/vibrato thing in JC-120H (the head version) is a lot smarter:
(I think this labelling was also used in the JC-77). There's a “MANUAL-OFF-FIXED” rocker switch but no vibrato feature. ...Or is there? Now, what was originally vibrato mode is now the manual mode. The fixed mode is the ordinary fixed chorus mode. Did the operation change? No, just the labelling but it makes a lot more sense now. Those heads do have some real differences too, like a potentiometer to replace the bright switch and different kinds of jacks at the rear panel.
But anyway, someone should really make a dedicated site about these amps.
Leave a comment:
-
Hey that would be a good one for April 1 drasp !
When in doubt read the manual...................................
Leave a comment:
-
Manual from 1996:
http://www.nuci.org/store/manuals/Ro...orus%20120.pdf
Quote: * Neither the speed nor depth of the Chorus effect can be changed.
---
I think it's been this way since day one.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by teemuk View PostAt least in some circuit revisions the chorus mode (if I remember right) disables both of the potentiometers (speed and depth) completely and replaces them with a constant resistance value or something. That’s just a basic “feature” of those amps. I believe it’s like that in all of them. The controls are not even supposed to work in chorus mode.
THANK YOU!!!
Leave a comment:
-
What would cause the pots to work correctly with vibrato & not chorus?"
If that remark was just off topic then here's a one final mention about something worth of checking out: In many revisions of the chorus circuit the LFO is switched on with a semiconductor switch, triggered by the output signal of the power amplifier. If the semiconductors switch (a transistor) or the trigger signal’s circuit path from the PA has failed the LFO won’t oscillate and the clock driving the BBD is locked on to a constant frequency.
Leave a comment:
-
Unfortunately, the rear-mounted, user accessible pot doesn't have any affect on my problem. I marked it and then ran it through it's full range and while it does seem to have some affect on the chorus, it doesn't make the controls functional. Still, good to know what it does - 'focus' the chorus.
Leave a comment:
-
Another point, the replacement speaker in my amp (a Pyle) is much louder and 'edgier' than the stock speaker when the vibe/chorus is off, but the two seem much better balanced when the effect is on. Is this just a product of the way the stereo effect works or is this another symptom of my problem?
One side is altered with respect to the other (straight signal)
I would try adjusting the rear control after carfully noteing where the control is.
In the forum Vintage Amps under the heading "Need schematic diag Roland JC120 " vintagekiki posted 3 schematics.
One of them is close to yours "Roland JC120&160' 79.pdf" uses the MN3002.
http://music-electronics-forum.com/s...56289#poststop
Recently I had a "Starforce USA" made in Korea by a fly by night manufacturer
which had a chorus and echo built in..echo worked chorus didn't.
There was a little trim pot which when adjusted brought the chorus into focus.
I'll attach a picture of the section (sorry little large 441kb) and it shows a control VR6 ? (little hard to read) connected to V1 V2 and a 4.7k resistor which your photo shows and its called (drum roll) "Chorus Adjust" !
So I suppose a rear mounted user accessible control in an amp from a pawn shop is a very strong contender !
The control may need cleaning (Caig Fader Lube or similar) and also I noticed
a 50k preset hanging off the MN3002 which I also highlighted which hopefully can be left untouched.
Could it be that simple ?
We wait with bated breath...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by oc disorder View PostI presume you have read this thread ?
http://music-electronics-forum.com/s...ead.php?t=4492
The smalll board connected to the power transformer wiith wire wound resistors and transistors for regulation was riddled with dry joints in one I looked at ages ago.
Another point, the replacement speaker in my amp (a Pyle) is much louder and 'edgier' than the stock speaker when the vibe/chorus is off, but the two seem much better balanced when the effect is on. Is this just a product of the way the stereo effect works or is this another symptom of my problem?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by oc disorder View PostI presume you have read this thread ?
http://music-electronics-forum.com/s...ead.php?t=4492
Just spotted some early cmos 4000 series in your photos..these are so cheap and prone to failure
possibly worth changing..snip em out clean up the debris and fit 2 x IC sockets
Your suggestion about the CMOS 4000 series chips is a bit over my head, but I'll look in to it - do you have a suggestion for a correct replacement?
I'd still REALLY like to know what the single pot accessible by the small hole in the back of the chassis controls. One purple & one green wire going from it to 'v1' and 'v2' on the chorus PCB - shown in my pictures above. Any guesses?
Leave a comment:
-
"The chorus and reverb now work quite well with one exception = the rate & depth pots have little to no affect on the chorus, which is strange as both pots measure as working and affect the vibrato in a normal, linear fashion. What would cause the pots to work correctly with vibrato & not chorus?"
Is this possible? I haven't worked on one of these for a while, but I thought that the chorus and vibrato controls were controlling the same thing in either position of the switch, the difference being whether or not there was straight signal mixed with the delayed signal or not.
Leave a comment:
-
I presume you have read this thread ?
http://music-electronics-forum.com/s...ead.php?t=4492
The smalll board connected to the power transformer wiith wire wound resistors and transistors for regulation was riddled with dry joints in one I looked at ages ago.Everything worked except the chorus which I suppose
shows the "chorus area" is the most sensitive area to minor power supply
faults.To flip the board to inspect it have to dissconnect the short wires from the transformer..thats of course if yours has one !
Just spotted some early cmos 4000 series in your photos..these are so cheap and prone to failure
possibly worth changing..snip em out clean up the debris and fit 2 x IC socketsLast edited by oc disorder; 11-17-2008, 07:00 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by drasp View PostThanks.I'll have a chance to check it on Monday & report back.
Last edited by drasp; 11-17-2008, 05:16 PM.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: