Quick question regard biasing

[Helmholtz]

Maybe this helps:

For the tube only the voltage between grid and cathode matters, consisting of DC bias and AC signal.
The grid leak resistance always should be smaller than the internal grid resistance, which is typically very high (>>10M) but strongly drops at large positive signal peaks.
So I would expect an influence of grid leak value on large signal/distortion behaviour. There may also be a difference at very high frequencies.

[catalin gramada]

Alles klar!Kann night spreche in gutte Deutsch auch. Tut mir leid.

[Helmholtz]

Thank You Helm.
Have another newbie question then, as follow:
From a triode perspective the grid leak it count just as load for previous source ? Otherwise, the valve didn't care if the signal swing at its input into 1k or 1M grid leak resistor as input impedance supposed the source can drive it in any circumstances? (don't talk about charging/discharging timing caused by possible capacitive coupling, as can be fitted for any time constant),please ?

Sorry, not clear what you mean (double language barrier). Maybe you give an example.

[catalin gramada]

Thank You Helm.
Have another newbie question then, as follow:
From a triode perspective the grid leak it count just as load for previous source ? Otherwise, the valve didn't care if the signal swing at its input into 1k or 1M grid leak resistor as input impedance supposed the source can drive it in any circumstances? (don't talk about charging/discharging timing caused by possible capacitive coupling, as can be fitted for any time constant),please ?

[Helmholtz]

OK, from tube data the gain of your 12AX7 is G=72. From this the input capacitance calculates as 120pF. Real value will probably be closer to 150pF, because of wiring influences.
Worst case treble attenuation happens at max. source impedance as seen by the grid. This is around the 50% setting of the vol pot, amounting to about 280k.
Means that at this setting the upper corner frequency will be about 4kHz.
A treble cap of 150pF should be sufficient to compensate the treble loss at this worst case setting.

Edit: The gain of 72 above is with bypassed cathode cap. Without cap, gain drops to 40 and input capacitance will be around 100pF. Treble attenuation can be expected to start above 5kHz.

[catalin gramada]

Understood. 12AX7 btw.

[Helmholtz]

This is the first pole, the second one will be determined by input capacitance of the valve itself in conjunction with series resistance and input impedance whatever the signal is shunted to the ground...I thought...
What I tried to do is to preserve the big input impedance of second stage and to present a series capacitor frequency compensation in a way to not load suplimentarry the first stage as well...if it have any sense...

Anyway the second coupling cap and grid leak resistor don't improve anything. You can't compensate a low pass filter with a high pass filter having a much lower corner frequency. A bright cap of 100pF to 200pF should be a better solution. I don't understand why it didn't work for you.

I deleted my earlier post because it was based on a calculation error. What tube do you use?

[catalin gramada]

This is the first pole, the second one will be determined by input capacitance of the valve itself in conjunction with series resistance and input impedance whatever the signal is shunted to the ground...I thought...
What I tried to do is to preserve the big input impedance of second stage and to present a series capacitor, as second pole in a way to not load suplimentarry the first stage as well.The second grid will "see" a more consistent condition in this way, no matter by volume pot position...if it have any sense...
It is 10 times diference, should be better 100x, but practical consideration...

[catalin gramada]

I did not expect to improve into tonal way, just to have more consistency over volume pot position. I cannot manage a bypass cap over pot in a way to keep consistent tone from low to loud volume. Trying everything from 100pF to 1nF

[Helmholtz]

Think freq reponse will be more consistent preserved over volume control range. Does it works ? Thanks

I can't think of a reason why the frequency response should improve.
Connecting the grid to the pot wiper eliminates the second coupling cap and actually gives slightly better bass response.

What's wrong with the frequency response?

[catalin gramada]

Think freq reponse will be more consistent preserved over volume control range. Does it works ? Thanks

[Helmholtz]

Thank You.
I.m trying to figure a "better" volume control with better frequency characteristic over a more consistent impedance. A second order in this position also hope to get some tonal benefits. (It is a bass aplication) This is my plan:

[ATTACH=CONFIG]56191[/ATTACH]

What benefits do expect over connecting the grid directly to the vol pot wiper?

[catalin gramada]

Thank You.
I.m trying to figure a "better" volume control with better frequency characteristic over a more consistent impedance. A second order in this position also hope to get some tonal benefits. (It is a bass aplication) This is my plan:

[Helmholtz]

Thanks, I can measure , but just edited for an additional question:

...if is changed it will be disturbed by operational input voltage condition swing ?

If " operational input voltage condition swing " means an AC signal, average DC cathode voltage (determing the bias point) will not change. To be precise, this only holds for linear operation. Asymmetric plate/output signals generally cause a bias shift independent of biasing method.

[catalin gramada]

Thanks, I can measure , but just edited for an additional question,please:

...if is changed it will be disturbed by operational input voltage condition swing ?