Seems alot of time is spent finding the perfect Tube or Tone Cap. Here's another angle:
I've been working with some SE OT's for a P1X amp, trying to find that balance between audio range & roll-off. Working strictly to design rules, in general, if the Inductance of the XFMR rolls off 20% from OCL reading with x milliamps applied, you'd call that the current rating.
If I butt stack the laminations on the core on a "125DSE" sized XFMR I can carry 100mA plus by this measure, but if I stack the lams 4x4 it rolls off more than 20% but sounds 'better'....at least if what you crave is somewhere in the Joe Walsh to Black Hole Sun range & you love rich harmonics. The inductance is higher, which in theory can get me down to 80Hz. The tone's great with a 6L6, 6L6GC and 6V6GT, but it doesn't quite seem to quite pull off an EL34 with the same grace. I suspect the big bottle needs too much juice.
On paper & to my ears it seems like the 4x4 stack set-up is rolling off right around or above 50-60mA and handling 10-11W. If I look at Duncan's CLASS A S/E tube data specs for the 6L6/6V6 family I could be at the balancing point where all the electrons are scrambling to be heard before falling off a cliff. When I get back home this weekend, I'm going to try and measure current/power to check these assumptions.
There seem to be a lot of smart folks here. Anybody know what the tube should be doing from a output & distortion standpoint right around it's max current rating? Does it want to live there? I'm thinking this is where power amp section distortion comes from.
Does it make any sense that the XFMR should 'matched' to that tube operating point?
Or are there valid reasons to keep some spare milli-amps around?
I've been working with some SE OT's for a P1X amp, trying to find that balance between audio range & roll-off. Working strictly to design rules, in general, if the Inductance of the XFMR rolls off 20% from OCL reading with x milliamps applied, you'd call that the current rating.
If I butt stack the laminations on the core on a "125DSE" sized XFMR I can carry 100mA plus by this measure, but if I stack the lams 4x4 it rolls off more than 20% but sounds 'better'....at least if what you crave is somewhere in the Joe Walsh to Black Hole Sun range & you love rich harmonics. The inductance is higher, which in theory can get me down to 80Hz. The tone's great with a 6L6, 6L6GC and 6V6GT, but it doesn't quite seem to quite pull off an EL34 with the same grace. I suspect the big bottle needs too much juice.
On paper & to my ears it seems like the 4x4 stack set-up is rolling off right around or above 50-60mA and handling 10-11W. If I look at Duncan's CLASS A S/E tube data specs for the 6L6/6V6 family I could be at the balancing point where all the electrons are scrambling to be heard before falling off a cliff. When I get back home this weekend, I'm going to try and measure current/power to check these assumptions.
There seem to be a lot of smart folks here. Anybody know what the tube should be doing from a output & distortion standpoint right around it's max current rating? Does it want to live there? I'm thinking this is where power amp section distortion comes from.
Does it make any sense that the XFMR should 'matched' to that tube operating point?
Or are there valid reasons to keep some spare milli-amps around?
Comment