How well would this tube work for the cathode follower in a Sound City 200 head?
Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
12DW7, 7247, ECC832 -- A Cool Tube!
Collapse
X
-
I think adding one of these would give you more lows and you could swap in a lower K MV pot for less dulling at lower values. Perhaps even a 100K, though 250K might be decent. Might be a better idea for bass or a Strat. You could add a DPDT switch for alternate biases (plate and cathode) so you could match the tubes better. Adding a 22k in // to the 100K would near-double the current rating which the tube would see. On the cathode try 500Ω // with 1K. Or am I off with these values?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jazz P Bass View PostOlder Ampeg amps used these tubes.
You run your hand over the tube & they hum.
Tap them & you can really hear them rattle.
And these are NOS tubes!
I've used the new production JJs quite a bit, and haven't noticed any particular tendency to microphonics. They're quite handy for implementing tube effects loops.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Guitarist View PostI think adding one of these would give you more lows and you could swap in a lower K MV pot for less dulling at lower values. Perhaps even a 100K, though 250K might be decent. Might be a better idea for bass or a Strat. You could add a DPDT switch for alternate biases (plate and cathode) so you could match the tubes better. Adding a 22k in // to the 100K would near-double the current rating which the tube would see. On the cathode try 500Ω // with 1K. Or am I off with these values?No good deed shall go unpunished
Comment
Comment