Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Mis information

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Rick its always amusing to me that Jon talks about "positioning" like he pioneered this PAF research shit. I first met Jon when he emailed me in 2005 and asked to trade one of his pedals (a nice one I might add) for one of my early PAF attempts, I was already making my own parts, experimenting with different alloys and asking Joe Gwinn alot of questions on the forum, Jon made pedals and maybe a StewMac kit bucker. I had a full line of every type of pickup and many of my own unique designs, Lollar helped me get started so I had a very broad range experience in pickup making already at 3 years, and got Joe to teach me to use an LCR meter, which no one was using back then, now most have them. From some comments on other forums its obvious that some of his customers think that he taught ME all about this stuff when I was actively on the trail of back-engineering PAF's from real early in my career. We did share some info at one point but I quit as I got deeper into real treasures and I didn't want him making the same thing I am.

    There was really no one on the pickup forum back then who was interested in PAF's enough to really do anything about it other than mismatch a coil now and then ;-) I was obsessed with finding out why those pickups just don't sound like anything being made and why couldn't I GET those tones.

    Anyway end of story, end of pissing match. Jon focuses on mass production, I focus on making individual sets that are intensely finely crafted products that take hours and hours to make, I like having total control of each pickup that goes out, I don't use assemblers, I do everything myself, my main interest isn't making money its TONE, yes I'm stupid. Jon is doing great so far, but you can't nail an accurate PAF witout a Leesona? Come on, get real. I do like Jon and if I thought I was going to fall over dead next month I would pass the ton of information on to him as really no one else out there gives a crap about this stuff except me and him, despite the pissing matches ;-) It would take a small book to put down what I've learned and the technical data I have but who would buy it? And it would put me out of business ;-) I'd pass it on to RedHouse but he is still deep into research into how to make LSD in his bath tub ;-) so far it keeps turning out as butter....

    You name it, I've tried it Rick, if it comes under the subject of PAF's, but not strictly limited to that. My main love is experimenting and trying everything and anything I can dream up to see what works and to debunk theories. I have all the gear here to make pretty much anything I want. I love working with my hands and making things, and have a back ground in art metal jewelry, casting, and fabrication. I bought a couple thousand dollars of expensive electrical steel at one point because Joe Gwinn thought maybe that Seth Lover's "soft iron" comment meant "electrical steel." It worked pretty well but it was just going in the wrong direction, the stuff was nearly pure iron and was just too "soft" sounding ;-) and expensive as hell to get centerless ground for slugs, and a horror story trying to mill keepers out of thick hot rolled sheet. It would take 3 hours to make 2 keepers and they looked like shit and my mill complained loudly. I tried steel shims on both sides instead of wood and all kinds of ridiculous things, I had screws made in 2 alloys, I got AllStar and Magnetic Hold to get the Chinese to start making rough cast magnets, now they are everywhere. Allstar's looked great but were real thin and useless, Magnetic Hold's are perfect and the best anyone makes, they could pass for real. I did alot of stuff I won't even mention, every crazy idea you could probably think of I did and I found a wealth of useable knowledge and tricks. I discovered a liquid potting fluid that would give you the equivalent of vintage magnet wire, but it was too unctrollable in the end. It wouldn't solidify the coil either which is what I wanted, I spent months on that one and may some day revisit it. I still constantly experiment with PAF parameters looking for perfection, there are strict recipe and specs but within that there is room for endless variety, they all sound pretty much the same but you can get endless textures, bloom, etc. etc. I just finished one experiment this evening that worked great! Perfection, perfection, perfection, its out there, I want it!

    I've been working with an industry magnetics alloy specialist for 3 years so far and have learned a ton of stuff from him and he did extensive lab work for me on nearly the complete history of Gibson vintage steels, up to late TTop era, screws, slugs, keepers, P13's parts, everything. I don't think anyone has ever done that in such detail. Really you don't want to be using silicon alloys for screws as they would be really bright sounding, what works best are alloys with the most eddy currents and permeability you can get, thats where the most musical tones come from, thats for screws not slugs. The higher carbon stuff just sounds too bright for me. But if you're wanting hi-fi tones, the efficient magnet alloys would be worth looking into. There is a book called Ferromagnetism by Bosworth or some similar name if you want to damage your brain. PAF's use 3 different alloys, they were common alloys of the period and just off the shelf material, nothing special. Steel making back then was noticeably different and you can read the elements list on a variety of lab tests and compare to modern steel and see the differences. They used whats called the Bessemer process or open hearth, all those furnaces in the US are gone, the last one closed in '68. Steel now is made much more pure and clean and thank God is still being made in the US, but I have gotten really bad batches of stuff that sounded horrible. Same thing for magnet wire, the old copper was less pure and more ohms per foot, insulation was different and not applied the same way. Elektrisola did a bunch of lab work on vintage wire samples I've saved since day one when I started this career. That wire can never be made again, there's no source for bare wire stock made the old way.

    There's members here who insist PAF's are nothing mysterious, there's no secrets, they want things to be easy and get it all from Wikipedia or StewMac, well I'm here to say there is nothing simple about those pickups, it took 8 years of obsessive experimenting, questioning industry specialists and engineers and trying to find some who worked at Gibson back then, not to mention tearing real PAF's apart and staring at the parts for weeks measuring everything, missing nothing. You have to immerse yourself in that era's materials technologies if you want to decode this stuff. I found one guy who did work at Gibson back then but he knew nothing of value. You would think with all I know I'd get alot of questions but no yet has asked me a single question here, there's just no interest in the subject, except Gundry and me, and yeah we butt heads mostly over what's real and whats bull, I really try not to have new "myths" about those pickups contaminate the web, because I get those questions, now, why don't I use a vintage winder? Because you don't need one if you replicate what you find, which is easily done by any automatic winder and intelligent control, you know that. Anyway, back to work here....
    http://www.SDpickups.com
    Stephens Design Pickups

    Comment


    • #62
      Thanks Stave Dephens, for a minute I had forgotten how great you are. Can I get some 1955 accurate earrings? Get a haircut you hippie. LOL

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by Possum View Post
        ...Anyway end of story, end of pissing match....
        That's a lot of verbiage for the end of the story.

        Originally posted by Possum View Post
        ... It would take a small book to put down what I've learned and the technical data I have but who would buy it?...
        Yep, small book, no sales.


        Originally posted by Possum View Post
        ...I'd pass it on to RedHouse but he is still deep into research into how to make LSD in his bath tub ;-) so far it keeps turning out as butter...
        No thanks, I prefer intersting material, not into fantasy documentary's.

        Originally posted by Possum View Post
        ...You would think with all I know I'd get alot of questions but no yet has asked me a single question here...
        Pretty much says it all doesn't it? word-up dude.

        Kinda reminds me your post:

        "I wrote an article for 20th Century Guitar Magazine last year and only one person contacted me about it, it was a big flop....I wrote Premier Guitar asking is they'd be interested in an article and a pickup review, they were so interested in the subject they didn't even reply"

        Keep on it, you'll discover why.

        Originally posted by Possum View Post
        ...why don't I use a vintage winder? Because you don't need one if you replicate what you find...
        Well you typically insist that things must be faithful to original to be accurate (ie; metals, plastics, wire) insist nobody gets it right but you
        _BUT_
        when it suits your story you don't mind using cheezy materials and claim it's all the same and doesn't matter.
        (ie; Stripping the paint of a Squire makes it warm and wonderful or don't need the actual winding machine real PAF's were made on or listen to my accurate PAF's in my $99 Les Paul and Epihone Les Paul copys).


        Originally posted by Possum View Post
        ...and got Joe to teach me to use an LCR meter, which no one was using back then...
        Someone helps you and you see that as you got them to do something?

        You mean no one was using an LCR meter as far as you know. Too funny thinking that because you became aware of something others have been using and not talking about, that you are (were) "the first"?....Bzzzt

        Truly a drama, The world according to Dave, myth-buster and PAF archeologist extrodinaire, leaps tall problems with a simple discovery that no one else has done, re-writes history with a daydream and a mouse-click. All you need is a pair of blue tights and a red cape to sell that small book!.


        This whole screw order gone bad thing you are telling smacks of this thread?
        (Münchausen thing?)

        "there is no such thing as an EXACT perfect spec'd screw, there are tolerances allowable for any machine screw. If you want super exact consistent screws you probably have to buy a screw machine yourself."

        Back in '07 in this thread here you were whinning about nobody going-in on screws with you, then immediately turned around and skunked Nightwinder....Bzzzt

        All the horescrap about having to eat someones share in your screw buy? in the thread I said I'd go in on some but with some reservations (see them first) along with KevinT and Poorman.

        Then you said "If I can't find a third buyer I'd be willing to offer 5,000 screws but probably a steeper price" then promptly shut-down the group buy....Bzzzt

        Between us three, we would have bought the bailed share, but in reality, it simply came down to you didn't want us to have them.

        Another perspective to your PAF research, hard work, and machinations, there is this post:

        "The most authentic PAF commercially I've heard and even been fooled by are Burstbuckers"

        Do you really wonder why people ring the BS buzzer?
        Last edited by RedHouse; 08-25-2010, 04:07 PM. Reason: typo's
        -Brad

        ClassicAmplification.com

        Comment


        • #64
          The most eddy currents would be with low permeability...

          And this is where you get into the whole issue of whether you want magnetic circuit efficiency or whether there are compromises to make for other reasons...

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by Possum View Post
            Rick its always amusing to me that Jon talks about "positioning" like he pioneered this PAF research shit. I first met Jon when he emailed me in 2005 and asked to trade one of his pedals (a nice one I might add) for one of my early PAF attempts.
            OMG this is another load of B.S.! I never traded Dave a pedal for one of his PAF pickups! Dave contacted ME years ago asking me how I made my servo controlled winder to hand guide via R/C. Then I later asked him if it he wanted to trade a TELECASTER set of pickups for one of my pedals. We did the trade. I still have the Tele neck pickup in the guitar but pulled the bridge pickup long ago.

            Dave posted this same B.S. story on the Gear Page last weekend and it was pulled by the moderators when I pointed out it was a sham of a story. I don't know if Dave has just toasted his memory over the years of if it is a conscious effort to misrepresent everything in his favor. I will leave it to you to decide.

            Either way here is the Tele pickup I traded with Dave for a ThroBak pedal. But according to Dave this is a PAF!

            They don't make them like they used to... We do.
            www.throbak.com
            Vintage PAF Pickups Website

            Comment


            • #66
              1) Y'all are cracking me up with this ridiculous shit

              2) Bill L.'s pickups sound to me like the inverse of his hearing loss...

              Comment


              • #67
                Oh, you should have been a fly on the wall in my office at Gibson West when Bill Lawrence and Les Paul were arguing about who did what first...

                Highly amusing...

                Comment


                • #68
                  Turn on that exhaust fan !!! The solder fumes are getting to everybody
                  "UP here in the Canada we shoot things we don't understand"

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by Rick Turner View Post
                    2) Bill L.'s pickups sound to me like the inverse of his hearing loss...
                    A bit bright, no?
                    It would be possible to describe everything scientifically, but it would make no sense; it would be without meaning, as if you described a Beethoven symphony as a variation of wave pressure. — Albert Einstein


                    http://coneyislandguitars.com
                    www.soundcloud.com/davidravenmoon

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      The frequency response must look like a drawing of an icepick...

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Originally posted by Rick Turner View Post
                        The most eddy currents would be with low permeability...
                        No, the opposite, but it's a bit more complex than that. Both incremental permeability and electrical conductivity matter. If you increase either or both, in any combination, the eddy currents increase (and the skin depth decreases). What governs is the product of permeability and conductivity.

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Sorry I'm late to the party, I was so busy spreading disinformation and confusion on other fora that I forgot to check in here!
                          It will happen again. Brad can tell you how much I like to pontificate blindly on subjects I know nothing about. I honestly thought that's what the web was for.
                          Well look out because I'm back and my pencils are sharp just as my mind is fogging up. Read everything twice, invert the sentence structure and shake out the true answer (which is always 42). Easy as that.

                          Now where did my emoticons go?

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Originally posted by David King View Post
                            Read everything twice, invert the sentence structure and shake out the true answer (which is always 42). Easy as that.
                            And that's also why we use 42 for PAFs...


                            Now where did my emoticons go?


                            I was wondering where you had been.
                            It would be possible to describe everything scientifically, but it would make no sense; it would be without meaning, as if you described a Beethoven symphony as a variation of wave pressure. — Albert Einstein


                            http://coneyislandguitars.com
                            www.soundcloud.com/davidravenmoon

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X