Originally posted by LtKojak
View Post
Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Define "Note Definition & Articulation"
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by FunkyKikuchiyo View PostHang out, talk shop, or jam? Possum lays down some decent blues from what I understand....
Me, I EXCEL at bad blues licks.It would be possible to describe everything scientifically, but it would make no sense; it would be without meaning, as if you described a Beethoven symphony as a variation of wave pressure. — Albert Einstein
http://coneyislandguitars.com
www.soundcloud.com/davidravenmoon
Comment
-
Originally posted by FunkyKikuchiyo View PostIs tuning required?
I don't even play at home unless I'm in tune. Otherwise it hurts my ears.It would be possible to describe everything scientifically, but it would make no sense; it would be without meaning, as if you described a Beethoven symphony as a variation of wave pressure. — Albert Einstein
http://coneyislandguitars.com
www.soundcloud.com/davidravenmoon
Comment
-
Originally posted by David Schwab View PostThat's like saying should you zip your fly?
I don't even play at home unless I'm in tune. Otherwise it hurts my ears.
Comment
-
Years ago, I went to a tiny charity concert, and one of the acts was a punk band composed of high school kids. As soon as they struck up it was obvious that they were seriously out of tune, even by punk standards. An older guy (one of their dads?!) came on stage and started twiddling their tuning keys while they were playing, but it only made the din worse.
I didn't know whether to laugh or cut my ears off."Enzo, I see that you replied parasitic oscillations. Is that a hypothesis? Or is that your amazing metal band I should check out?"
Comment
-
Comment
-
Let me repeat once again that the phase characteristic a double resonant pickups have a complicated form,
even if the coils are very close interaction and connection to the cable.
Double resonance pickups sound more transparent
Myself I don't think the phase response of any audio component matters a hoot, except in so far as it determines the frequency response through Bode's relations.
These relations (and hence my whole argument) only hold for minimum-phase systems. Maybe Mike Sulzer would care to post a short dissertation on Bode's relations and the humbucker as a minimum phase system."Enzo, I see that you replied parasitic oscillations. Is that a hypothesis? Or is that your amazing metal band I should check out?"
Comment
-
Originally posted by Steve Conner View PostA complicated shape to the frequency response implies a complicated phase response too, therefore less phase linearity. So if what you said is correct, double resonance pickups should sound less articulate. (And more transparent at the same time?)
Myself I don't think the phase response of any audio component matters a hoot, except in so far as it determines the frequency response through Bode's relations.
These relations (and hence my whole argument) only hold for minimum-phase systems. Maybe Mike Sulzer would care to post a short dissertation on Bode's relations and the humbucker as a minimum phase system.
Comment
-
This has nothing to do with whether your pickups sound good, it's a question of why do they sound good? Do they sound good for the reasons you think, or is it something else altogether?
I'll restate my claim: If phase linearity implies transparency, then a pickup with two resonances should sound less transparent than a pickup with a single resonance.
If the double resonance pickup sounds more transparent, that agrees with my theory that says that transparency is not some audiophile accuracy thing, just an illusion caused by an upper midrange and treble boost."Enzo, I see that you replied parasitic oscillations. Is that a hypothesis? Or is that your amazing metal band I should check out?"
Comment
-
Originally posted by Steve Conner View PostThis has nothing to do with whether your pickups sound good, it's a question of why do they sound good? Do they sound good for the reasons you think, or is it something else altogether?
I'll restate my claim: If phase linearity implies transparency, then a pickup with two resonances should sound less transparent than a pickup with a single resonance.
If the double resonance pickup sounds more transparent, that agrees with my theory that says that transparency is not some audiophile accuracy thing, just an illusion caused by an upper midrange and treble boost.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Steve Conner View PostA complicated shape to the frequency response implies a complicated phase response too, therefore less phase linearity. So if what you said is correct, double resonance pickups should sound less articulate. (And more transparent at the same time?)
Myself I don't think the phase response of any audio component matters a hoot, except in so far as it determines the frequency response through Bode's relations.
These relations (and hence my whole argument) only hold for minimum-phase systems. Maybe Mike Sulzer would care to post a short dissertation on Bode's relations and the humbucker as a minimum phase system.
Comment
-
The 2-4 kHz range, known as the singers' formant, is the frequency range that contains most of what determines clarity of speech. If you EQ that out of your music, you usually can't understand the words. Having good response in that range certainly helps with clarity in pickups too.
A lot of the different ways we describe tone are not entirely accurate. For instance, a harsh or ice-pickey sound does not necessarily mean too much treble. A jagged, peaky midrange response is more often the cause of a harsh sound. You can have a whole lot of treble and not sound harsh, and you can have a whole lot of bass without sounding boomy. Most of the unpleasant characteristics of pickups are caused by the "texture" (peakiness or smoothness), not the shape, of the frequency response.
Comment
Comment