Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

GIBSON PATENT

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • GIBSON PATENT

    Anyone ever noticed this? Its starting to come around and bite people on the butt.
    Patent US5894101 - Single-coil electric guitar pickup with humbucking-sized housing - Google Patents

    personally I think its too obvious and should not be patentable- mosrite had interchangeable buckers and single coils as did gretsch.

  • #2
    Originally posted by jason lollar View Post
    personally I think its too obvious and should not be patentable- mosrite had interchangeable buckers and single coils as did gretsch.
    Obvious & prior art. Strike one & two and besides, doesn't a patent now have a 20 years-from-application sunset? So at most it has @ 2.75 years to run out. So mark your calendars pickup bulders, if big bad Gibson worries you. (At some point the patent period was expanded from 17 to 20 years IIRC, so it's even possible this patent has run its course as of now.)
    This isn't the future I signed up for.

    Comment


    • #3
      personally I think its too obvious and should not be patentable- mosrite had interchangeable buckers and single coils as did gretsch.
      Absolutely.

      Comment


      • #4
        It seems clear that they haven't gone after anyone who makes P-90 style pickups in humbucker cases. There are an awful lot of them currently on the market.

        Humbucker-Sized P-90 Review Roundup | Premier Guitar
        It would be possible to describe everything scientifically, but it would make no sense; it would be without meaning, as if you described a Beethoven symphony as a variation of wave pressure. — Albert Einstein


        http://coneyislandguitars.com
        www.soundcloud.com/davidravenmoon

        Comment


        • #5
          Well you just gave them the list of who to go after...

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by David King View Post
            Well you just gave them the list of who to go after...
            They are in that list, so I'm sure they know! I'm quite sure they made their version after others did too.
            It would be possible to describe everything scientifically, but it would make no sense; it would be without meaning, as if you described a Beethoven symphony as a variation of wave pressure. — Albert Einstein


            http://coneyislandguitars.com
            www.soundcloud.com/davidravenmoon

            Comment


            • #7
              Right! It's the standard Randy Smith (Besa Moogie) move of throwing up a patent to discourage much of the competition. Not even half of what Mesa patented was enforceable and neither is this. The only reason I can come up with for why they give patents on this stuff is that the people policing the applications have no clue what they're dealing with or how to research for prior art.
              "Take two placebos, works twice as well." Enzo

              "Now get off my lawn with your silicooties and boom-chucka speakers and computers masquerading as amplifiers" Justin Thomas

              "If you're not interested in opinions and the experience of others, why even start a thread?
              You can't just expect consent." Helmholtz

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Chuck H View Post
                Right! It's the standard Randy Smith (Besa Moogie) move of throwing up a patent to discourage much of the competition. Not even half of what Mesa patented was enforceable and neither is this. The only reason I can come up with for why they give patents on this stuff is that the people policing the applications have no clue what they're dealing with or how to research for prior art.
                The only reason companies apply for BS patents such as this is they think they can get away with it, and it does not matter if they fail. With a stiff penalty in place for frivolous patent applications, this would not happen.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Some people patent inventions, and some people invent patents.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    The patent office is probably underfunded in our efforts to eliminate gvt fraud and abuse. With patent trolls who needs patents anyway? Let the wealthiest among us control intellectual property rights the old fashioned way and then everything will be just dandy.. -not.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by jason lollar View Post
                      Anyone ever noticed this? Its starting to come around and bite people on the butt.
                      Patent US5894101 - Single-coil electric guitar pickup with humbucking-sized housing - Google Patents

                      personally I think its too obvious and should not be patentable- mosrite had interchangeable buckers and single coils as did gretsch.
                      Well it's expired now so they can't do much about it.

                      Patents

                      "For applications filed on or after June 8, 1995, utility and plant patents are granted for a term which begins with the date of the grant and usually ends 20 years from the date you first applied for the patent subject to the payment of appropriate maintenance fees for a utility patent. There are no maintenance fees for plant patents . Design patents last 14 years from the date you are granted the patent. No maintenance fees are required for design patents.

                      Note: Patents in force on June 8, 1995 and patents issued thereafter on applications filed prior to June 8, 1995 automatically have a term that is the greater of the twenty year term discussed above or seventeen years from the patent grant."
                      -Brad

                      ClassicAmplification.com

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        its not expired, they made a slight change to it and they have an active patent- I dont post things without reason. sorry I wont say more. Just a heads up for those that advertise or have a website with something like that on it.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by jason lollar View Post
                          its not expired, they made a slight change to it and they have an active patent
                          A slight change? And what sort of "slight change" extends Gibson's patents...

                          "Hey Joe (patent office guy) this is Dale over at Gibson. Yeah, you know, we could use more time on that patent. That'd really be great. Oh you got the tickets for Sundays game. Good. Alright Joe. Talk to you later. And thanks a million buddy."
                          "Take two placebos, works twice as well." Enzo

                          "Now get off my lawn with your silicooties and boom-chucka speakers and computers masquerading as amplifiers" Justin Thomas

                          "If you're not interested in opinions and the experience of others, why even start a thread?
                          You can't just expect consent." Helmholtz

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by jason lollar View Post
                            ... I dont post things without reason. sorry I wont say more...
                            I meant no offense Jason, it's all good.

                            I was just posting it's expired going by the grant date since it's a non-utility patent.
                            (14 years max)
                            -Brad

                            ClassicAmplification.com

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I do not see why putting a pickup into a slightly oversized enclosure is patentable in any way.
                              How braindead must the guy be who checked and approved this?

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X