Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

jazz bass pickup and stacked pot questions

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • jazz bass pickup and stacked pot questions

    Just a few questions on the Fender jazz bass pickups:

    - Was the Fender jazz bass magnet polarity and winding direction of the pickups always set as humbucking? Is this really necessary?

    - Why the change from the stacked pots to the 3 and from memory 4 pot layout? Any issues with the stacked pots?
    int main(void) {return 0;} /* no bugs, lean, portable & scalable... */
    www.ozbassforum.com

  • #2
    Originally posted by mkat View Post
    Just a few questions on the Fender jazz bass pickups:

    - Was the Fender jazz bass magnet polarity and winding direction of the pickups always set as humbucking? Is this really necessary?
    I believe it was. It's not necessary, it was a feature. At the time Gibson had come out with humbuckers, so Fender had to find ways to do hum cancelation. The P bass pickup squeaked past Lover's patent, even though he had a similar arrangement. Fender got a patent on a split pickup, but it wasn't for hum cancelation.

    So Fender did the hum canceling thing with the Jazz Bass, and Jazz Master guitar, Jaguar, and the Mustang. I'm not sure if Tele's were or are that way. Every time I have a Tele in my hands I forget to check!

    There's no reason to do it except to get rid of hum.


    Originally posted by mkat View Post
    - Why the change from the stacked pots to the 3 and from memory 4 pot layout? Any issues with the stacked pots?
    I'm guessing because the stacked pots were more money. It does give you two tone controls, and that might alter the tone slightly. The current basses have two volumes and one tone.

    It does look really cool though.
    It would be possible to describe everything scientifically, but it would make no sense; it would be without meaning, as if you described a Beethoven symphony as a variation of wave pressure. — Albert Einstein


    http://coneyislandguitars.com
    www.soundcloud.com/davidravenmoon

    Comment


    • #3
      I read an old interview with John Entwistle somewhere (EDIT: now I remember, his bass collection book) where he mentioned he liked the sound of the Jazz bass with the stacked pots a lot better than the 3 pot configuration.
      www.MaillouxBasses.com
      www.OzBassForum.com

      Comment


      • #4
        Good stuff, thanks for that. I have a cheaper Fender jazz bass and made a set of pickups for it to replace the crappy set that were in it (not humbucking). There is shielding paint in the cavities and I grounded the magnets and noticed that there is minimal hum. I think the grounding can also be improved on this, so that's another thing I'll compare.

        The only thing I don't like is the 3 pot setup. I have parts for a stacked pot configuration, so I'm going to rewire it this way to compare. There should be more options with this setup tone wise.

        Also, is it pure brass plates that Fender used in the pickup cavities?
        int main(void) {return 0;} /* no bugs, lean, portable & scalable... */
        www.ozbassforum.com

        Comment


        • #5
          Where did you get the stacked pots?
          www.MaillouxBasses.com
          www.OzBassForum.com

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Phil m View Post
            Where did you get the stacked pots?
            Guitar Parts Resource have the CTS concentric pots, appropriate knobs and control plate. The control plate is really easy to make though.
            int main(void) {return 0;} /* no bugs, lean, portable & scalable... */
            www.ozbassforum.com

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by mkat View Post
              Also, is it pure brass plates that Fender used in the pickup cavities?
              You mean the plate under the pickup? Yes. I have a few of those in my parts bin.
              It would be possible to describe everything scientifically, but it would make no sense; it would be without meaning, as if you described a Beethoven symphony as a variation of wave pressure. — Albert Einstein


              http://coneyislandguitars.com
              www.soundcloud.com/davidravenmoon

              Comment


              • #8
                Actually, would the standard '62 wiring diagram work for this setup since my pickups are not wound for humbucking (two single coil pickups, same polarity, same winding direction)?
                int main(void) {return 0;} /* no bugs, lean, portable & scalable... */
                www.ozbassforum.com

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by David Schwab View Post
                  You mean the plate under the pickup? Yes. I have a few of those in my parts bin.
                  Yes, the plate under the pickup with the foam on it.
                  int main(void) {return 0;} /* no bugs, lean, portable & scalable... */
                  www.ozbassforum.com

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by mkat View Post
                    Yes, the plate under the pickup with the foam on it.
                    yeah, it looks like brass.
                    It would be possible to describe everything scientifically, but it would make no sense; it would be without meaning, as if you described a Beethoven symphony as a variation of wave pressure. — Albert Einstein


                    http://coneyislandguitars.com
                    www.soundcloud.com/davidravenmoon

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Thanks for the info. I made two sets of pickups for the bass, really happy with the sound:

                      - vintage style set
                      - overwound set for added beef

                      The '62 wiring has changed the tone as David mentioned, I think it has more options than the 3 pot layout apart from the lower end. There is not as much bottom end range as the 3 pot configuration, which is ok. It has a more defined and tighter low mids. In saying this, I'll also try using the 3 pot setup with these pickups since I'm comparing against the stock Fender pickups with the 3 pot layout.

                      I've been making the flatwork myself, but did use the Allparts flatwork for the neck pickup since I couldn't use machinery last night due to the noise. Just a warning on these to anyone considering buying them, as they are too thin and not wide enough (the thickness and width differs to their bridge counter parts which are fine and standard Fender dimensions for vulcanised fibre flatwork on jbass pickups).
                      int main(void) {return 0;} /* no bugs, lean, portable & scalable... */
                      www.ozbassforum.com

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Phil, I just noticed that AllParts also have the stacked pots.
                        int main(void) {return 0;} /* no bugs, lean, portable & scalable... */
                        www.ozbassforum.com

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Thanks Micheal, BTW did you use a regular 2 pot/2tone/2 pickup schematic for it or did you find the original Fender schematic somewhere?
                          www.MaillouxBasses.com
                          www.OzBassForum.com

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Phil, the wiring diagram for a Fender '62, don't know if it's the reissue, is available on the Fender site. Look for "American Vintage '62 Jazz Bass®":

                            http://www.fender.com/support/wiring...sts.php#basses

                            It's more work wiring this setup, but interesting to hear the difference.
                            int main(void) {return 0;} /* no bugs, lean, portable & scalable... */
                            www.ozbassforum.com

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X