Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Firebird PU small metal top plate - necessary?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • big_teee
    replied
    I made a firebird hybrid I liked a lot, a couple of years back.
    Used the standard baseplate, bobbins & firebird cover.
    Inside I used a standard humbucker A8 Bar mag on the bottom.
    Used 2 custom cut slug bars in the bobbins.
    I cut the slug bars a little wider so they barely stuck through the top of the bobbins, allowing to sit near, or against the cover.
    An advantage with the slugs, you can use any standard Humbucker magnet underneath.
    A2-A8, C5, or C8.
    Worth a try, if you're trying to come up with something different.
    I liked it! Can be tuned warm or bright, depending on bar magnet.
    T

    Leave a comment:


  • charrich56
    replied
    Thanks, guys, I appreciate all your answers.

    I've thought for a long time that the mini-humbucker/Firebird PU was treated like the red-headed stepchild of the pickup world, but maybe a good modern design could offer some great tones and some advantages for fit (fits P-90 cavity easily with the adapter, and you can put 3 of them on a Strat pickguard.)

    Leave a comment:


  • copperheadroads
    replied
    I don't find a unbalanced strings without the small B plate so I don't use it .

    Leave a comment:


  • 12xu
    replied
    Originally posted by rjb View Post
    [wild speculation]
    Maybe because you use an electrically well-balanced string set?
    I wouldn't doubt the "old-school" guys at Gibson tested the pickup with "old-school" strings....
    [/wild speculation]

    -rb
    I've always heard that was the reason they did it.

    Not needed with modern strings.

    Leave a comment:


  • rjb
    replied
    Originally posted by 12xu View Post
    I've had good results without using the plate.
    [wild speculation]
    Maybe because you use an electrically well-balanced string set?
    I wouldn't doubt the "old-school" guys at Gibson tested the pickup with "old-school" strings....
    [/wild speculation]

    -rb

    Leave a comment:


  • 12xu
    replied
    I've had good results without using the plate.

    Leave a comment:


  • salvarsan
    replied
    Originally posted by charrich56 View Post
    Could someone comment on the Firebird pickup, whether the small sheet metal piece which is installed on the treble side on top of the two magnets, is either necessary or desirable, if you don't want to necessarily duplicate the Firebird PU sound?
    Yes, it's a magnetic field soak to decrease the B,G string contributions.
    Lacking adjustable screws, it's an economical pickup tweak.
    The StewMac picture helps explain things.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	Firebird_Mini_Humbucker_Pickup_Kit.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	21.4 KB
ID:	845630

    Leave a comment:


  • charrich56
    replied
    Yep, it would shunt some of the field which would magnetize what looks like the G and B strings. But knowing what Gibson's rationale for doing it in the first place, would save me some experimentation time I'd like to devote to some other things.

    Leave a comment:


  • rjb
    replied
    My guess is that the ferrous metal sheet reduces the magnetic field reaching the treble strings.
    The obvious answer is "try it".

    -rb

    Leave a comment:


  • charrich56
    started a topic Firebird PU small metal top plate - necessary?

    Firebird PU small metal top plate - necessary?

    Could someone comment on the Firebird pickup, whether the small sheet metal piece which is installed on the treble side on top of the two magnets, is either necessary or desirable, if you don't want to necessarily duplicate the Firebird PU sound?

    Does it make the string outputs more balanced bass to treble, or anything along those lines?

    Thanks in advance for replies/comments.

    -Charlie
Working...
X