Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

50w Plexi build -- odd operation

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 50w Plexi build -- odd operation

    This is a fresh 1988 50w plexi build using the chassis, PT and OT from an Ampeg VT-60. The amp is basically what's in the layout but with a 22k bias pot, no impedance selector, and added ppimv. Pretty straight forward. The amp works and sounds good but starts high pitch whining when the volume(s) are raised. If the master is low then you can dime the channel volume and vise versa, but raising both gets the whine going and the whining can vary in pitch. And turning up the unused channel's volume exacerbates it as well.

    Here's a list of idle voltages. Note the high cathode voltage on one of the EL34's(1 ohm resistors are installed)..

    V1
    1. 141
    3. 1.07
    6. 199
    8. 1.94

    V2
    1. 149
    3. 1.17
    6. 293
    7. 150
    8. 152

    V3
    1. 216.4
    2. 27.5
    3. 44.8
    6. 214.9
    7. 28.3
    8. 44.8

    V4
    3. 490
    4. 482
    5. -34.3
    8. .1

    V5
    3. 500
    4. 490
    5. -34.8
    8. 29.6
    Attached Files
    ~Semi-No0b Hobbyist~

  • #2
    That would be 30 amps or 900W at that V5 cathode resistor, so either it's wrong value or there is open circuit somewhere.
    But even the .1V at V4 cathode seems very high.
    Have you tried disconnecting the NFB loop as far as the whine goes?
    Originally posted by Enzo
    I have a sign in my shop that says, "Never think up reasons not to check something."


    Comment


    • #3
      ok the 1 ohm resistor was open. Never had that happen before... anyway, swapped it out and biased down and each got the cathodes down to .035~ each across the 1r. That's still too much, right? 35w per tube? And the plate voltage of course went up and is pushing 520. And that .035 was measured with the bias pot all the way closed so prolly need to get a 50k pot and put in there...

      Am I getting this right and should something be done about the high voltage?
      ~Semi-No0b Hobbyist~

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by g1 View Post
        Have you tried disconnecting the NFB loop as far as the whine goes?
        Actually haven't even hooked the NFB up yet. I'll try connecting it and see if that helps.

        edit: hooked up the forgotten nfb connection and that cleaned the whining right up. Can't believe I missed that
        Last edited by mort; 06-11-2017, 01:22 PM.
        ~Semi-No0b Hobbyist~

        Comment


        • #5
          Can someone help me understand the different voltage ratings on this data sheet? 2000v 800v & 450v

          http://www.jj-electronic.com/images/.../el34_e34l.pdf
          ~Semi-No0b Hobbyist~

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by mort View Post
            Can someone help me understand the different voltage ratings on this data sheet? 2000v 800v & 450v

            http://www.jj-electronic.com/images/.../el34_e34l.pdf
            It looks to me like those are max values that should not be exceeded. EL34 have other uses beside amplifiers. I think I've seen them in power supplies before.

            nosaj

            P.S. Where in Florida are you?
            soldering stuff that's broken, breaking stuff that works, Yeah!

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by mort View Post
              ok the 1 ohm resistor was open. Never had that happen before...
              It happens, and can be quite useful in limiting tube current; hence I think that 1/2 resistors (with a flame retardant coating) can be beneficial in this application.

              Originally posted by mort View Post
              ...got the cathodes down to .035~ each across the 1r. That's still too much, right? 35w per tube? And the plate voltage of course went up and is pushing 520...
              No, 35mV across a 1 ohm resistor indicates that 35mA is flowing.
              35mA x 520V indicates that the tube (plate + g2) is dissipating 18.2 watts, so not too bad (a bit cooler at such high HT may be better, depending on the OT impedance).
              My band:- http://www.youtube.com/user/RedwingBand

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by nosaj View Post

                P.S. Where in Florida are you?

                between orlando and daytona
                ~Semi-No0b Hobbyist~

                Comment


                • #9
                  FWIW, and this may be considered blaspheme to some, but...

                  Many modern el34's are more tender to HV than their vintage predecessors. I had all my problems with the Rusky tubes. The Shuguang tubes were fine electronically, but a bit too microphinic for a combo type amp and that's pretty unacceptable for a new tube I think. Still, that's what's out there. Marshall type amps have a vague history of blowing screen grids. I think this is because they use a relatively low primary impedance and are often overdriven. When a power tube is clipping there are often high frequency/voltage spikes. Since impedance rises with frequency in an inductor it's possible for plate impedance for these spikes to rise above the screen grid circuit impedance and overdissipate the screens. Then POP! This is one of the major reasons 1K resistors are always recommended for el34's. IMHE the insurance of 1k screen grid resistors isn't sufficient all the time anymore. I would consider putting an additional 1k resistor in series with the choke. This would also "soften" the amp a little in the face of your high-ish volts (for better or worse I suppose). This would also drop the preamp voltages a little. You can bring the preamp voltages back up by reducing the value of one of the 10k resistors in series in the HV rail.

                  JM2C
                  "Take two placebos, works twice as well." Enzo

                  "Now get off my lawn with your silicooties and boom-chucka speakers and computers masquerading as amplifiers" Justin Thomas

                  "If you're not interested in opinions and the experience of others, why even start a thread?
                  You can't just expect consent." Helmholtz

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by mort View Post
                    Can someone help me understand the different voltage ratings on this data sheet? 2000v 800v & 450v

                    http://www.jj-electronic.com/images/.../el34_e34l.pdf
                    Ua 800V is the classic "Plate voltage rating" found in most datasheets, it means "Power supply V+ must not exceed 800V" .
                    FWIW Philips published a 2 x EL34 , 100W RMS amplifier which was very popular here, which used 800V +V .

                    Now what many forget is that in push pull amps the output transformer works like an electricl see saw, when one plate saturates and almost reaches ground, the other reaches 2 X +V , some 1600V here.

                    And that with a resistive load; with a speaker which is inductive it may get way higher.

                    Hence the other (rarely seen elsewhere) voltag rating:
                    Ua0 2000V means voltage which must not be exceeded, even if tube is passing ZERO current, or it will arc inside.

                    Ug2 450V is the maximum *screen* voltage not to be exceeded.

                    The 100W I mentioned was split rail: 800V plate but 400V screen.

                    As I said, very popular in Argentina, when I was young every Club seemed to have one, very justified because it was loud, inexpensive, and mainly because because Philips offered, besides the circuit like anybody else, *full* winding details for primary and output transformers, which were relatively simple, I built and sold a lot of them.
                    Only "problem" was that original OT only offered a 500 ohm tap, because it was meant for large places and long distance line transformer speakers, I recalculated it for 4 and 8 ohm output.
                    Juan Manuel Fahey

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Ah, yes, the data sheet... It's just a cartoon. That is, it resembles real life in a playful way but you can't take it literally or you might get hurt. Ok, maybe not that bad. But we have it on pretty good authority from one of our members that most of the rusky tubes are made by completely non technically trained labor remote from the brander/seller. That is, none of the factory employees have to have any clue how a tube works. only how to operate the machinery. No QC is done at the factory. At least that's what we were told. Any testing for relative goodness must be really poor because I've gotten MANY duds brand new from on line tube vendors (which apparently don't all test anymore either). I can't say that JJ tubes haven't been tested accurately to see that they actually perform to the spec sheet, but I can say that I've seen them pop within spec'd parameters many times. And isn't it interesting that with very little variance any new spec sheets look like regurgitated information from vintage spec sheets? The same member that offered the info on the rusky tube plant also indicated that there is nothing "wrong" with the healthy tubes leaving the factory, but they aren't really the actual tubes their model designates. That is, a new spec sheet should be made to indicate the actual specs of those tubes and perhaps even a new model number so that people know it's quite specifically NOT the model it's marked as.

                      I've been through five sets of rusky el34's from three different, known vendors in the last five years and only one lived in a healthy environment. I've been through three sets of Shuguang el34's from two of those same vendors and they all worked fine, but all were all microphonic.

                      I have to own up the fact that when I test my builds I eventually get to the "crank 'em up and see" part. Because I KNOW that will happen to them. Admittedly it's not protocol for vendors or even guitar amp tech repairs to test in this manner (though some smart techs actually do). So am I abusing the tubes? Nope. Such a test is typical of the environment in which they will be used. Some vendors will expect you to justify that. Mostly because they're assholes getting away with what they CAN instead of doing what they SHOULD. That's greedy and evil and they should be peeled. Rant over

                      YMMV
                      "Take two placebos, works twice as well." Enzo

                      "Now get off my lawn with your silicooties and boom-chucka speakers and computers masquerading as amplifiers" Justin Thomas

                      "If you're not interested in opinions and the experience of others, why even start a thread?
                      You can't just expect consent." Helmholtz

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Chuck H View Post
                        That's greedy and evil and they should be peeled. Rant over
                        I read that as "they should be peed over"
                        If it still won't get loud enough, it's probably broken. - Steve Conner
                        If the thing works, stop fixing it. - Enzo
                        We need more chaos in music, in art... I'm here to make it. - Justin Thomas
                        MANY things in human experience can be easily differentiated, yet *impossible* to express as a measurement. - Juan Fahey

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by eschertron View Post
                          I read that as "they should be peed over"
                          Close enough
                          "Take two placebos, works twice as well." Enzo

                          "Now get off my lawn with your silicooties and boom-chucka speakers and computers masquerading as amplifiers" Justin Thomas

                          "If you're not interested in opinions and the experience of others, why even start a thread?
                          You can't just expect consent." Helmholtz

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I hear the Ruskis are actually into that in some cases.
                            It's weird, because it WAS working fine.....

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Chuck H View Post
                              I have to own up the fact that when I test my builds I eventually get to the "crank 'em up and see" part. Because I KNOW that will happen to them. Admittedly it's not protocol for vendors or even guitar amp tech repairs to test in this manner (though some smart techs actually do).
                              Yay! I'm smart!
                              Maybe my amps should come with a warning label: "Not Suitable For Bedroom Or Apartment Installation!"
                              Or, "No Polite-Society-Friendly Circuits Inside. Please Refer Usage To Proper Guitar Players."
                              "Wow it's red! That doesn't look like the standard Marshall red. It's more like hooker lipstick/clown nose/poodle pecker red." - Chuck H. -
                              "Of course that means playing **LOUD** , best but useless solution to modern sissy snowflake players." - J.M. Fahey -
                              "All I ever managed to do with that amp was... kill small rodents within a 50 yard radius of my practice building." - Tone Meister -

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X