Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

First tube amp project. Schem questions

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • First tube amp project. Schem questions

    Hi people, first post here, I have been participating in various other forums, mainly DIYstompboxes, but Iīve caught the tube amp fever...

    Iīd like to ask for your help/insight/experience on my build project, the Dīluxe Princess. This is my first tube amp build, I have previously made a tube preamp, but that was on a PCB, so it doesnīt really count (...).
    I got a set of transformers for a 5E3 Deluxe, so I went from there as a starting point, knowing that it would work well to power two 12AX7īs and two 6V6īs in PP. What I did was use the preamp section of the Princeton AA1164, removed the vibrato and reverb part, and "glued" it to the 5E3 Deluxe power amp. since I had a triode left, I added another gain stage with volume control. By the way, my target result sound wise is clean sound with humbuckers at low gain, and crunch/dist at high gain. Then I added some things such as an Fx loop, heater elevation, bleed resistor, middle control, screen resistors, changed rectification to diodes, feedback and an external speaker jack (this will be a combo).
    So I finished the schematic, here it is:

    [ATTACH]4361[/ATTACH]

    Later Iīll make the layout.

    Now the questions:
    1) First, will it work?? Have I missed anything basic?
    2) Since I changed the rectification to diodes the voltages will be higher than with a recto tube, when I calculate the B+ after the diodes (325 x 1.4) it gives me 455V. I know that under load the voltage will drop some, but I think itīs too high for the 6V6īs, and also for the filtering caps, if I use 450V ones. I know that in Fenders the 6V6 is used above their specified plate voltage without problem (I think around 400V usually), but I donīt want to burn mine. So I put R27 after the diodes, to drop the B+, but Iīm not sure what value should it have and what wattage rating. Anyone can help?
    3) What do you think about the FX loop? Is that OK, design wise? Iīm not sure about what the signal level and impedance will be at this point. Too high?
    4) What about the heater elevation resistors, are they OK in value and wattage?
    5) I upped the value of the feedback resistor, so as to get less feedback. will that work?
    6) I added screen resistors for the 6V6īs although the 5E3 schem doesnīt have them. Will there be a problem with that?
    7) What do you think about the speaker jacks connection? is it OK (the idea is that when you plug an external speaker, the internal one is disconnected)?
    8) What do you think the result will be, sound wise? a "only dirt" amp? a clean machine?

    Well, if thereīs anything else you see that deserves comment, please do so. I know, itīs a lot of questions, but since this is my first build, I have zero experience, and that brings anxiety... I also know that some of my questions can be answered by doing the math, but Iīm just learning about that, and usually my calculations end in total disaster...


    Thanks for reading, for your time and your help.
    Last edited by tboy; 02-02-2009, 11:50 PM. Reason: resized and attached image

  • #2
    R-27. I would start with 100 ohms, 5 watt.
    R-28. I'm not sure you could source a 1 meg ohm at 5 watts. But I've seen values between 270 K up to 390 K in that range. If so, you may need to drop the value of R29 accordingly.
    Interesting approach to the stand-by switch.
    Otherwise, it looks ok to me.

    -g
    ______________________________________
    Gary Moore
    Moore Amplifiication
    mooreamps@hotmail.com

    Comment


    • #3
      R28: For a 1M resistor to dissipate 5 Watts you need a voltage of 2236V across this resistor
      With 450V, a 1M resistor will dissipate .2W, so a half Watt R will be enough.


      Cheers,
      Albert

      Comment


      • #4
        Thanks people for your answers, Iīm getting a clearer picture.
        Now, some people have said to me that the FX loop is not in a good place, that in that place of the circuit thereīs gonna be too high an impedance and too much signal excursion. Would it be better to place it between the 3rd gain stage and the phase inverter? Or, Iīm starting to think that it would be better to convert the 3rd gain stage into a cathode follower and put it after that... would that work?

        Thanks

        Comment


        • #5
          BF tone stack

          It is my understanding that the black face tone stack you are using has very high insertion losses.

          I was wondering if changing R4 and R8 from 100k to 68k would increase the preamp gain enough to compensate for the loss.

          LOL its more of a question than a suggestion.

          Ray

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by stingray_65 View Post
            ...changing R4 and R8 from 100k to 68k would increase the preamp gain
            Lowering the value of those two resistors would decrease the gain. The BF preamp is already designed to make up for the loss in the tone stack.
            -tb

            "If you're the only person I irritate with my choice of words today I'll be surprised" Chuck H.

            Comment


            • #7
              Ok people, Iīve reworked the design.

              [ATTACH]4362[/ATTACH]

              - Added a tube rectifier. I also added R27 and R30 to that, according to some things I read. Are they OK?
              - Upped the first filter cap to 33 uF. Will it affect the recto tube?
              - Eliminated the feedback loop. It will make the amp a bit more dirty, right?
              - Added a switch to the third gain stage, the idea is to have more flexibility, from a "fender" type clean without the third gain stage to a more "marshally" JCM800 thing (Iīm referring to the amount of distortion, not to the tone) with it in the circuit.
              - Moved the FX loopīs location. I think here it will work better, at least in the sense of having more of the final sound at the send. If itīs not useful for interfacing with effects because of impedances and levels mismatch, at least Iīll have a preamp out and a power amp in...

              Opinions?
              Last edited by tboy; 02-03-2009, 12:01 AM. Reason: resized and attached image

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by tboy View Post
                Lowering the value of those two resistors would decrease the gain. The BF preamp is already designed to make up for the loss in the tone stack.
                I stand corrected

                Ray

                Comment


                • #9
                  Why not eliminate that heater elevator stuff and just connect the heater CT to the output tube cathodes? A very old trick. Or just ground that center tap.

                  Why the fancy bleeder switch circuit? Just wire the bleeder across the filter cap so it is always there? We are now relying on this switch for safety.

                  You can reduce the negative feedback, you can make it variable and call it a presence control, you can even remove the NFB altogether. is there a reason you have chosen to do this?

                  The concern with your loop is the signal level, in my view. A line out should have a line level signal - a volt or less.
                  Education is what you're left with after you have forgotten what you have learned.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Hmmmm. Most layouts I've seen, the "boost" switch was just tied to a cap to increase the low end a bit. Here, it's actually tied to a gain stage making it a "real" boost switch. Very good . . very, very, good . . . .

                    I do have a couple of thoughts...

                    pin 1 of V1b ; add in series a 22K shunted by 100 pF. This will keep the gain of the tube inside the range of audio frequencies, and not RF frequencies... Same with pin 2 of V2a.

                    C6 and C9 ; take them down to 10 nF to keep the chords from sounding too muddy. Single notes you may not hear any difference. Then, C10 ; bring that one up to 1000 uF. That helps the power tubes breath easier on the low end.

                    R19 and R20. I use different values for them, but what you have there is fine. Just make sure resistors you use for your grid stoppers, try to mount them directly on the tube sockets ; if possible. It helps.....

                    R30 and R27. Nice thought. It will give you some real nice old fashion compression along with the 5Y3. As an option, you could run a couple of 1n4007 diodes in series with pin 4 and pin 6 of the 5Y3. They will keep the power supply going if the rec tube gets an internal short. Not new tube, but old tubes that have been played and giged hard. . .

                    -g
                    ______________________________________
                    Gary Moore
                    Moore Amplifiication
                    mooreamps@hotmail.com

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Enzo, thanks for the suggestions, they make sense. As you can see I eliminated the feedback loop in the last schem. I had a feedback loop to get a cleaner sound, but I donīt know if it will make a big difference.

                      Quote:
                      "pin 1 of V1b ; add in series a 22K shunted by 100 pF. This will keep the gain of the tube inside the range of audio frequencies, and not RF frequencies... Same with pin 2 of V2a.
                      -g "

                      Mooreamps, I donīt quite understand... you mean just before the grids of V1b and V2a (pin 2) and with the cap in parallell with the resistor?

                      Thanks

                      EDIT: about C10, you mean 100 uF I guess, or is it really 1000 uF?
                      Last edited by Mostro; 02-03-2009, 02:59 PM.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        OK, hereīs the latest schem revision. I changed the heaters reference, bleeder R, R21 and C17 location, added R28. What do you think?

                        Thanks for the help!
                        Attached Files
                        Last edited by tboy; 02-04-2009, 08:40 PM. Reason: attached image

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Mooreamps, I donīt quite understand... you mean just before the grids of V1b and V2a (pin 2) and with the cap in parallell with the resistor?

                          Thanks

                          EDIT: about C10, you mean 100 uF I guess, or is it really 1000 uF


                          Just like what you have for R21.
                          Yes, 1000 uF for 6V6.
                          470 uF for EL-84

                          -g
                          ______________________________________
                          Gary Moore
                          Moore Amplifiication
                          mooreamps@hotmail.com

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X