It's funny how people will say something on the internet and then it becomes sticky to the point that it becomes prevailing wisdom. I'm running across an example of this right now, where people are claiming that an SVT *must* be run into a 4R or 2R load, and *only* a 4R or 2R load, and that an 8R load will kill the amp.
Of course, around here we're the type of people who look at vacuum tube operating characteristics and we understand what happens when you displace the operating point on the tube's impedance curve.
What strikes me as odd is that there are people who vehemently insist that you can't run an SVT into an 8R load, or that you'll kill it if you try to do that. I can't say that I agree. The first thing that we need to ask ourselves is WHY did Ampeg spec the SVT for 4R or 2R cabinets. I think that the reason for this is because back in 1969 there weren't any good drivers that could handle 300W of output, so Ampeg was forced to use an 8x array of low power drivers to have enough power handling capacity. Using an 8-pack of 32R speakers in parallel gave them a 4R load. They didn't design the OT for an 8R tap for obvious reasons.
Things are different now. There are 8R cabs that can handle SVT power. But the SVT has never changed, it's still made with a 4R tap and a 2R tap.
The question often comes up whether or not you can use an 8R cabinet with an SVT. Of course, my answer to this is yes, because I do it all the time. But try to tell the 4R zealots that it's OK to do this and you've got a fight on your hands.
Has anyone else here used an SVT with an 8R load at high output levels? I do it all the time with no problems whatsoever. The math tells me that it's OK to do this, but I thought I'd ask if anyone has an opinion that the math is wrong.
Of course, around here we're the type of people who look at vacuum tube operating characteristics and we understand what happens when you displace the operating point on the tube's impedance curve.
What strikes me as odd is that there are people who vehemently insist that you can't run an SVT into an 8R load, or that you'll kill it if you try to do that. I can't say that I agree. The first thing that we need to ask ourselves is WHY did Ampeg spec the SVT for 4R or 2R cabinets. I think that the reason for this is because back in 1969 there weren't any good drivers that could handle 300W of output, so Ampeg was forced to use an 8x array of low power drivers to have enough power handling capacity. Using an 8-pack of 32R speakers in parallel gave them a 4R load. They didn't design the OT for an 8R tap for obvious reasons.
Things are different now. There are 8R cabs that can handle SVT power. But the SVT has never changed, it's still made with a 4R tap and a 2R tap.
The question often comes up whether or not you can use an 8R cabinet with an SVT. Of course, my answer to this is yes, because I do it all the time. But try to tell the 4R zealots that it's OK to do this and you've got a fight on your hands.
Has anyone else here used an SVT with an 8R load at high output levels? I do it all the time with no problems whatsoever. The math tells me that it's OK to do this, but I thought I'd ask if anyone has an opinion that the math is wrong.
Comment