Originally posted by Leo_Gnardo
View Post
Incidentally, I've always hated the 'bear trap' style. Just because of the pressure. Some would dig in so hard (depending on the base material used on the tube), that you have to literally *bend them* out of the way, or bend them back into 'holding position' after a swap because of lack of uniformity in base dimensions across brands.
I've always preferred the dual springs/cap method myself (retention wise), but those have their own minor hang-ups as well.
Perhaps one of these days, someone will create replacement noval and octal 'retention bases' that have a base made out of hard plastic, with a main body that partially encapsulates the lower third/half of the tube made out of high-temp silicon to perform tube-retention duties.
One plus would be the silicon style (as described) should be able to 'give' enough to accomodate the differences in dimensions between brands. As a perk, it could/should also conceivably help with microphonics!
Comment