Originally posted by Justin Thomas
View Post
Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Another mystery amp
Collapse
X
-
I wouldn't worry so much whether it looks "correct" for a certain type PI, but rather will the circuit work. Ther may be better ways or a "proper" paraphase might be different, but they could have purposely or ignorantly have designed it different. But it needs to drive one power tube with a signal and the other with its invert. SO we need to see if it will.Education is what you're left with after you have forgotten what you have learned.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Enzo View PostI wouldn't worry so much whether it looks "correct" for a certain type PI, but rather will the circuit work. Ther may be better ways or a "proper" paraphase might be different, but they could have purposely or ignorantly have designed it different. But it needs to drive one power tube with a signal and the other with its invert. SO we need to see if it will.
This circuit actually was a working amp. The cabinet was cheaply made, so I didn't expect much. Very distorted and no 'balls" with no sparkle/chime. Could very well have been "ignorantly designed". The HT is a low 290v. What do you guys suggest I change to temporarily improve matters. I will eventually use this chassis to build a 5e3 design. I already have OT and MULLARD OS 5y3 recto lying in waiting. Need to get a PT (325/325) in the new year.
Comment
-
From the tube complement he listed earlier it looked like an 18 watt Marshall setup except with 6V6s instead of EL84s and kind of a low B+. I would have put in an SS rectifier and made a Spitfire or something similar out of it.
Comment
Comment