Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

I dumped the Cathode Follower. Check out the new design.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Sorry for the hijack, and Chuck I'm not trying to be combative. I find your posts inspired and inspiring generally, and you've helped me a lot in the past. Went back and looked at what I did. It was on a phase inverter tube. Posting while tired, and breaking my rule of posting much here till I know what the hell I'm talking about. But I am here to learn. On my phase inverter, there's already a 2.7meg grid leak. What's another 470k? Enough about my stuff, I need to go back to the OP's circuit to stay in the conversation.
    Don't believe everything you think. Beware of Rottweiler. Search engines are free.

    Comment


    • #17
      That sounds like he's explaining stages within the feedback loop. Not power tubes. You can use large values on power tubes though. Mesa has a couple of designs that use 220k with 330k bias feeds in fixed bias. But they also have 2.2M leak resistors right on the power tube grids to bring down the net load (a net load of 440k. 110k ABOVE the max for fixed bias). This is the largest commercial power tube grid stoppers I know of. I'll have to see something written that clearly states 1M grid stoppers are OK on power tubes before I'll believe it's advocated.
      "Take two placebos, works twice as well." Enzo

      "Now get off my lawn with your silicooties and boom-chucka speakers and computers masquerading as amplifiers" Justin Thomas

      "If you're not interested in opinions and the experience of others, why even start a thread?
      You can't just expect consent." Helmholtz

      Comment


      • #18
        Okay, gonna go back and chill over at my DUH thread where I belong! You've given me something to think about for a while, thanks! I look forward to being able to communicate with you at your level someday...
        Don't believe everything you think. Beware of Rottweiler. Search engines are free.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Chuck H View Post

          Also, the extra filtering suggested wasn't bigger filters. It was another can added to the end of the rail at the top of V1A plate load.

          Yet another error in my schematic. The caps for v1-2 are to the left of the dropping resistor. I'll need to update that.

          I think on my next build, I'll do separate caps for each triode like the TW.
          Last edited by leadfootdriver; 02-26-2011, 12:25 PM.

          Comment


          • #20
            I'm curious.

            What, exactly, do "so much more dynamic" and "with a strong frequency response" mean?

            I know what "dynamic range" is and what the width, flatness, and so on of a frequency response are, but I'm not sure what "more dynamic" and "strong frequency response" are.

            Any hints?
            Amazing!! Who would ever have guessed that someone who villified the evil rich people would begin happily accepting their millions in speaking fees!

            Oh, wait! That sounds familiar, somehow.

            Comment


            • #21
              The cathode follower was really compressed. The parallel triodes weren't nearly as compressed, but it added a fatness to the tone along with a unique distortion. Now I'm on plate driven tone stacks. It has the most open, and articulate dynamics for this amp.

              Maybe a plate driven tonestack would be to stiff for a fixed bias amp. But I don't know. These are the tools in my box right now. I'm still learning.

              Comment

              Working...
              X