Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Creative Commons "FK-40" preamp circuit

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The Creative Commons "FK-40" preamp circuit

    Short story:

    Here is the schematic: http://pepeamps.com.br/conteudo/wp-c.../pepe_fk40.pdf

    Here is a not-so-technical text where I talk about the circuit: The FK-40 Circuit | Pepe Tube Amplifiers

    And here's a video where you can hear the functioning circuit : Haroldinho Mattos apresenta o HCA on Vimeo (My customer calls the amp HCA.)

    Note: The fuses aren't shown, my mistake. There's a fuse for each secondary winding on the power transformer: 6 Amps sloblo for the power tube heaters, 500 mA for the HT, 100 mA for the bias, 1 amp sloblo for the preamp tube heaters(12v). Mains fuse 2 A @ 220 VAC.

    ----

    So, the long story.

    Earlier today I was chatting with fellow forum members about open projects and licensing our work through a protective yet permissive license such as Creative Commons Attribution. I believe in openness because it speeds up progress. Someone from Russia can use a project from the USA, improve upon it and release it once more to the public for further development, all this while hopefully everyone is able to make money from the project so it's not free as in beer, but free as in freedom.

    I would love to see this become a tradition on the guitar world as well, instead of closing everything with patents and dripping black gook over components, why not license it openly and then require a citation if someone uses it?

    So, in that spirit, I'd like to share with you a circuit I've been tweaking for some time now. Here included are links to a reference build using this circuit, to show the result in practice. I don't even know if this is relevant enough to warrant its own thread, I'm just sticking my head out there, hoping this is OK to do.

    In May this year I developed this preamp circuit, I called it FK-40 because it was my fourth attempt at a two knob amplifier, so Two Knob TK-40 became Fourth Two Knob 40, or FK-40, which ended up having three knobs because I added a master volume. So much for my marketing talent.

    Basically the initial idea behind this circuit was to digest the entire tone stack into one control. Then on its current incarnation I implemented an old idea, to reduce low frequency response as the gain was increased, so you can get clear power chords even with high gain and full body cleans with low gain - in a single channel amp, using a single knob for that as well.

    The video above has some of that demonstrated, I think the idea works but may be improved upon, you can hear it get less bassy as the gain is dialed up. If you dial up both tone and gain, you get a very British distortion sound, if you have tone at max and gain at 40% you get a Texas Special tone. If you roll back both to around 40% you get a nice clean tone.

    Don't mind the cookbook recipe for the output stage.

    I used quality components to be sure any eventual mistakes were not the result of low quality material. The three of these amplifiers(four actually, one was a prototype) that I built were purchased from me by a friend here in town, the face design, logo, etc, belongs to him now along with the three amplifiers. But you can build this circuit in any style you like, I'd just like to disclaim ownership of that brand and looks, I don't own that.

    A wonderful guitar player, luthier and friend Haroldo Mattos was kind enough to record that video for the amplifier. I can't thank him enough for all his help and feedback he gave me about that circuit. He speaks in Portuguese so if you'd like to skip the talk there are sound clips from 0:00 to 0:30, some more playing at 0:53, 2:00 minutes, 3:02 minutes, 3:15 and only short clips from then on.

    Your criticism and ideas, both about licensing circuits via Creative Commons and about this example circuit, are welcome and very much appreciated.
    Valvulados

  • #2
    VERY good.
    Congratulations !!

    or ...

    Parabéns amigo.
    Gostei !!
    Juan Manuel Fahey

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by J M Fahey View Post
      VERY good.
      Congratulations !!

      or ...

      Parabéns amigo.
      Gostei !!
      Thanks! Glad you liked it. Obrigado mesmo.
      Valvulados

      Comment


      • #4
        Muito bem. I really like the cleans and the simplicity of the controls on the amp.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Gibsonman63 View Post
          Muito bem. I really like the cleans and the simplicity of the controls on the amp.
          Thanks so much for your comments(Portuguese included ), Gibsonman63. I was really aiming for simplicity on that circuit.
          Valvulados

          Comment


          • #6
            Love that amp and the tone... simple and sweet.
            I've been picking up a few submini tubes lately and looking for ideas.
            How would you feel about a two submini tube "Pepepedal" based solely on the preamp?

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by madkatb View Post
              Love that amp and the tone... simple and sweet.
              I've been picking up a few submini tubes lately and looking for ideas.
              How would you feel about a two submini tube "Pepepedal" based solely on the preamp?
              Hi madkatb, I'd be very curious to hear the result!

              I have some nuvistors lying around in some box around here, I may even try an experiment like that as well in the future, based on your idea.
              Valvulados

              Comment


              • #8
                Great sound.. If I could play like that I would build amps that clean.. Since I can't play as well, distortion hides.. the sins..
                as for CC copyright.. I agree 100% and do it for everything..

                Comment


                • #9
                  What nuvistors have you got jmaf? I've got a drawer full of 7586s, condition unknown. Maybe we could collaborate on something.
                  "Enzo, I see that you replied parasitic oscillations. Is that a hypothesis? Or is that your amazing metal band I should check out?"

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Not to sidetrack, but Brazil is a wonderful place to visit.

                    I think there is something to be gained by keeping the amplifier simple and not having a a switch and know for every conceivable function. It makes the voicing and tube selection more critical, and that's where the mojo is.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Steve Conner View Post
                      What nuvistors have you got jmaf? I've got a drawer full of 7586s, condition unknown. Maybe we could collaborate on something.
                      That'd be awesome, Steve. I have them somewhere in a box, I'll look for them and let you know. Have you done audio projects with nuvistors? It's a curiosity I have had for years, I'm just looking for an excuse(and the time...)
                      Valvulados

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Gibsonman63 View Post
                        Not to sidetrack, but Brazil is a wonderful place to visit.

                        I think there is something to be gained by keeping the amplifier simple and not having a a switch and know for every conceivable function. It makes the voicing and tube selection more critical, and that's where the mojo is.
                        Funny you mention Brazil, because I loved Houston

                        I've had this fixed idea with few knobs and few functions. I dig what you're saying: Keeping it as simple as possible is like playing in a three man band, like SRV and Double Trouble. Nobody can mess it up or everyone hears it
                        Valvulados

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Hi Jmaf

                          No, I haven't, but got to start somewhere!

                          The 7586 is a triode with medium mu and bags of transconductance. It's somewhat like a super 12AU7, 6DJ8 or whatever. I think it would suit lower supply voltages, it might even run well off the positive rail of a big solid-state power amp. I don't know if other nuvistors are more like the 12AX7, but I think the way they're constructed makes it difficult to get high mu.


                          I've attempted complex amps and simple ones, and I agree, the simple stuff is harder to design but at the end of the day, more practical to use. I'm looking for a better one-knob tone stack for my Corvette just now, I may give jmaf's version a try.
                          "Enzo, I see that you replied parasitic oscillations. Is that a hypothesis? Or is that your amazing metal band I should check out?"

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Nice sounding amp jmaf! I'm totally on-board about freedom to share ideas. Maybe there is a patent we can hold for freely sharing ideas?! Maybe this website can be patented thus! tboy?
                            Building a better world (one tube amp at a time)

                            "I have never had to invoke a formula to fight oscillation in a guitar amp."- Enzo

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Sometimes some "too fast" guy tries to Patent for his own profit an idea he saw somewhere else.
                              If the place/magazine/site/forum where he saw it is obscure enough, he might get a patent because Patent Office researchers basically research worldwide Patent databases, *maybe* (and thatīs a big maybe) they google a little ... and not much more.
                              I like to think that *this* (MEF, thatīs it) is a worldwide reference Forum, and anything published here is proof enough , both of something existing but more important, proof of *DATE*.
                              Really donīt know, maybe a Lawyer can enlighten us, up to what point someting published "virtually" (as opposed to a sheet of paper, with printer and date data) holds as "proof" in a Court of Law.
                              Paper Books and Magazines do, they always (by Law) state somewhere "printed by .... " and printing date.
                              They may even get an ISBN number.
                              Juan Manuel Fahey

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X