Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Choosing a vintage recicled PT for 5f11 project!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by DRH1958 View Post
    Hey Chuck, isn't that Depth control for varying the bias voltage as a function of a bias modulated tremolo? See the top half of the first 12AX7? Doesn't that function as the tremolo oscillator and the depth is the adjustment for the effect it has on bias voltage? That .25uF 400 volt cap couples the tremolo output signal to the 250k pot and it functions as a voltage divider for the -31 volt non-adjustable bias and the adjustment for tremolo depth. You can see the speed control just above it. It is a Vibrolux after all. Not a huge deal, just to clarify is all. Were it not a tremolo amp, it would indeed vary the bias voltage.
    What did you think I was talking about? I don't understand your direction or reason for correction.
    "Take two placebos, works twice as well." Enzo

    "Now get off my lawn with your silicooties and boom-chucka speakers and computers masquerading as amplifiers" Justin Thomas

    "If you're not interested in opinions and the experience of others, why even start a thread?
    You can't just expect consent." Helmholtz

    Comment


    • #17
      This is copy and pasted from your response: "That tap is just a convenient way to derive bias voltage. You can design a bias circuit without the tap and in fact that's what the GA30rvt does..." It sounds from this that you were just describing it as only a bias adjustment since the OP asked the question " what about the tap on the HT winding that goes to the "depth" pot?". If I interpreted your answer wrong, then I apologize. I guess having read many of your very detailed responses in the past, that you would have gone into more detail as to how these two interact with each other through that 250k pot to adjust the interaction of the fixed bias supply and bias modulation from the tremolo. Again, I apologize it I took it wrong. I was just trying to clarify it for angelothewolf. At the end I did say this: "Not a huge deal, just to clarify is all".

      EDIT: This stems from me liking things to be very clear. Everyone has been so helpful to me here and explained things very well, so I like to do the same since we don't know the ability level of people who pose questions. So for me, I like to err on the side of more info to be sure people understand things clearly.
      Last edited by DRH1958; 08-10-2016, 02:31 PM.
      Turn it up so that everything is louder than everything else.

      Comment


      • #18
        Well you DID take it wrong

        I was operating on the assumption that AOTW (angelothewolf) just needed to know that the circuit could be duplicated without that tap. I was remiss in not explaining the circuit, which, your right, I usually do. Somehow I interpreted that it was sort of "too much information" at that moment. But any questions that arise from explanations are also good questions
        "Take two placebos, works twice as well." Enzo

        "Now get off my lawn with your silicooties and boom-chucka speakers and computers masquerading as amplifiers" Justin Thomas

        "If you're not interested in opinions and the experience of others, why even start a thread?
        You can't just expect consent." Helmholtz

        Comment


        • #19
          I bought an old Peavey Classic 30. With a fried PT. The original idea was to restore it and keep it for myself. Then I take it apart, and when i saw that awfull PCB (in wich i have worked many times before) I thought maybe is a much better idea to build one from scratch inside of it. So as it seems quite a tweed, I choose the 5F11...

          I have a pair of hammond 7591 and was thinking to use that too, with the Gibson output iron... So I think this is going to be a Frankestain, I really like to keep it simple, with good parts. Ill try to draw the circuit, maybe with the bias arrangement of that later version of the Vibrolux, all your thoughts are very welcome!

          Comment


          • #20
            That sounds like a good plan. Thanks DRH for directing us to an appropriate schematic
            "Take two placebos, works twice as well." Enzo

            "Now get off my lawn with your silicooties and boom-chucka speakers and computers masquerading as amplifiers" Justin Thomas

            "If you're not interested in opinions and the experience of others, why even start a thread?
            You can't just expect consent." Helmholtz

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by angelothewolf View Post
              I bought an old Peavey Classic 30. With a fried PT. The original idea was to restore it and keep it for myself. Then I take it apart, and when i saw that awfull PCB (in wich i have worked many times before) I thought maybe is a much better idea to build one from scratch inside of it. So as it seems quite a tweed, I choose the 5F11...
              Many modern awful PCB amps can be improved by stripping them bare and mounting an eyeletted or simiar board inside.

              NOT because "PTP is better than PCB" which is nonsense but because the older simpler circuits are MUCH better than modern *designs* , mainly because these try to squeeze too much from a couple tubes.

              Compare a JCM900 which boasts of 2 switchable channels, high gain, active effects loop, reverb, compensated line out and a couple other gimmicks (triode/pentode, etc.) to a muscular Plexi, both have 3 x 12AX7 and same complement of power tubes, the old one has only 1 channel , no master, no loop or reverb, but provides bone crushing killer sound.

              Same with converting the "Classic"º 30 to a Tweed.

              Only problem is that you end up with too many empty holes on the front panel
              Juan Manuel Fahey

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by J M Fahey View Post
                Only problem is that you end up with too many empty holes on the front panel
                Meh, sheet aluminum is cheap AND easy to work! My solution to that problem, anyway...

                Or you could just stick in random pots, lights, & switches, label them with what they actually DO in the circuit, and listen to the customer rave about the subtle nuances that the "Nothing" switch provides in the On position...

                Justin
                "Wow it's red! That doesn't look like the standard Marshall red. It's more like hooker lipstick/clown nose/poodle pecker red." - Chuck H. -
                "Of course that means playing **LOUD** , best but useless solution to modern sissy snowflake players." - J.M. Fahey -
                "All I ever managed to do with that amp was... kill small rodents within a 50 yard radius of my practice building." - Tone Meister -

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by J M Fahey View Post
                  Same with converting the "Classic"º 30 to a Tweed.

                  Only problem is that you end up with too many empty holes on the front panel
                  Too many holes? Let the amp ventilate! Put in lights. Dummy knobs in kandy kolors?

                  With Peavey Classic series amps, you also have those series wired filaments to contend with. phooey.
                  This isn't the future I signed up for.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Hi there, so, im planning to use the gibson OT and 7591 instead the 6V6s. 5E11 circuit except for the bias negative supply wich will be from the 6G11-A circuit
                    AAny suggestions about the 7591s? just pinout or I will have to do another correction? what you think?

                    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6785.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	675.6 KB
ID:	843380

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6790.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	592.5 KB
ID:	843383

                      Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6792.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	580.4 KB
ID:	843384

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Hi there, just to update. Now I have all the pieces to mount this amp. Im using that gibson transformer wich has a 720VAC HT secondary, so Im thinking how to deal with it. I know that I can drop that voltage after rectification for the 6V6s, but do you think this will be too much voltage for the rectifier tube?

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          I didn't reskim the whole thread so I don't recall if you referenced a CT. If you have one then it's easier to reference 360-0-360. That would be a lot for a 6V6, typically. A 5y3 rectifier should handle the voltage with no trouble and will drop a lot of voltage. You'll probably end up with around 410V-420V. No problem for 7591's or most modern 6v6's. I wouldn't recommend running used good pulls of any vintage 6V6. Otherwise I think you're ok.
                          "Take two placebos, works twice as well." Enzo

                          "Now get off my lawn with your silicooties and boom-chucka speakers and computers masquerading as amplifiers" Justin Thomas

                          "If you're not interested in opinions and the experience of others, why even start a thread?
                          You can't just expect consent." Helmholtz

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X