Hello. Got a Simms watts 200 to restore, 4xkt88 in UL mode supplied at ca. 650V arround. What is wondering is its poor 12ax7 driver into big 220k grid leaks. Thinking more to add a pair of 12au7/12bh7 cathode followers in between and to reduce common grid leaks to 100k or less to have better drive capabilities. What are You thinking about, please? Thx.
Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Simms watts 200 question
Collapse
X
-
Simms watts 200 question
Last edited by catalin gramada; 02-28-2020, 06:11 PM."If it measures good and sounds bad, it is bad. If it measures bad and sounds good, you are measuring the wrong things."Tags: None
-
Originally posted by Helmholtz View PostWhy redesign? Does the amp exhibit a problem?Last edited by catalin gramada; 02-28-2020, 09:20 PM."If it measures good and sounds bad, it is bad. If it measures bad and sounds good, you are measuring the wrong things."
Comment
-
Thinking more like this.
Supplied at 600v seems within the limit. With 33 k on the plates got 240v iddling and max 500v max negative swing for 0 mA current to 100 k load. 100k grid resistors also should be safe enough for a pair of kt88 biased for less than 35w dissipation , as data sheet states ( 220k per tube biased less than 35 w-fixed bias op) Biased at -10v got 300V pk-pk voltage swing. Should be safe enough I think.Last edited by catalin gramada; 03-08-2020, 05:54 PM."If it measures good and sounds bad, it is bad. If it measures bad and sounds good, you are measuring the wrong things."
Comment
-
Some thoughts:
- Where did you find the info that the 12BH7 could stand plate voltages of 600V at signal peaks?
- Additional tube will reverse signal phase.
- Additional loop gain may cause stability problems and might require redesign of NFB circuit.
To me it looks like overkill.Last edited by Helmholtz; 03-08-2020, 08:18 PM.- Own Opinions Only -
Comment
-
Is not 600v on the plate. It will be supplied at 600v , almost same as screens for max excursion. The plates will stay at 240v around at idling and max excursion negative peak will be 500V for 0 mA with 100k load. This is within the absolute admissible voltages.Last edited by catalin gramada; 03-08-2020, 05:53 PM."If it measures good and sounds bad, it is bad. If it measures bad and sounds good, you are measuring the wrong things."
Comment
-
Originally posted by catalin gramada View PostIs not 600v on the plate. It will be supplied at 600v , almost same as screens for max excursion. The plates will stay at 240v around at idling and max excursion positive peak will be 500V for 0 mA with 100k load. This is within the absolute admissible voltages.
I couldn't find a 500V limit either.Last edited by Helmholtz; 03-08-2020, 06:10 PM.- Own Opinions Only -
Comment
-
Originally posted by Helmholtz View PostWhy redesign? Does the amp exhibit a problem?
(1) Not working right. What exactly is/are the problem(s)?
(2) Lack of bass. Have you measured the frequency response of the just the power amp? Just the -3db LF and HF points relative to 1Khz into a resistive load will do. -3dB is where the voltage is about 0.7 of the 0db value.Experience is something you get, just after you really needed it.
Comment
-
Last edited by catalin gramada; 03-08-2020, 08:52 PM."If it measures good and sounds bad, it is bad. If it measures bad and sounds good, you are measuring the wrong things."
Comment
-
I can't see PI supply voltages from the Marshall schematic. It's a UL design not requiring a separate screen supply. And yes, the ECC82 has a 550V Vp limit at zero current.
But I dunno, is the 200W Marshall actually a reliable, time tested design?
FYI, the Marshall model 2000 (250W, 6x6550) and model 2001 (375W, 8x6550) both used a "standard" ECC83 PI.- Own Opinions Only -
Comment
-
Originally posted by catalin gramada View PostUL yes, like mine. Voltages in the chart attached for 200w[ATTACH=CONFIG]57300[/ATTACH]
But I would estimate something like just below 600V at idle.Last edited by Helmholtz; 03-08-2020, 10:46 PM.- Own Opinions Only -
Comment
-
-
Last edited by catalin gramada; 03-08-2020, 11:17 PM."If it measures good and sounds bad, it is bad. If it measures bad and sounds good, you are measuring the wrong things."
Comment
Comment