Hello. May I ask if is a way to get a frequency variable nfb network in a way to get considerable amount of feedback for low frequencies to improve damping factor and no compensation at all for mid and hights please ? I figured some ideea but not to sure it is useful to worth to dig on it. Any thoughts please ? Thanks.
Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Variable nfb question
Collapse
X
-
Didn't you just draw a presence control?If it still won't get loud enough, it's probably broken. - Steve Conner
If the thing works, stop fixing it. - Enzo
We need more chaos in music, in art... I'm here to make it. - Justin Thomas
MANY things in human experience can be easily differentiated, yet *impossible* to express as a measurement. - Juan Fahey
- Likes 2
-
Yes, kind of, but want to achieve a high compensation, say 20db or more into low freq range (40-80 cps) and leave almost uncompensated the mids. Is a "presence control" but shifted all way down. I wonder if it work as simple as it is or I should be concerned by instability problems please ?"If it measures good and sounds bad, it is bad. If it measures bad and sounds good, you are measuring the wrong things."
Comment
-
The idea you propose is a simple solution at face value. There are always phase shifts when you create a filter. Whether this could cause more harm than good is unknown without more context. No harm in trying it."Take two placebos, works twice as well." Enzo
"Now get off my lawn with your silicooties and boom-chucka speakers and computers masquerading as amplifiers" Justin Thomas
"If you're not interested in opinions and the experience of others, why even start a thread?
You can't just expect consent." Helmholtz
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Some general considerations:
With the values shown in your right drawing, the NFB signal will be down by 3dB at around 17Hz and by 20dB at 1.7Hz.
That doesn't look very useful to me. And I don't think your OT can handle those frequencies anyway.
Also consider that 20dB more NFB means 20dB less signal level. So if you want to damp the speaker resonance (say at 50Hz), you will loose much bass response.- Own Opinions Only -
Comment
-
Originally posted by Helmholtz View PostSome general considerations:
With the values shown in your right drawing, the NFB signal will be down by 3dB at around 17Hz and by 20dB at 1.7Hz.
That doesn't look very useful to me. And I don't think your OT can handle those frequencies anyway.
Also consider that 20dB more NFB means 20dB less signal level. So if you want to damp the speaker resonance (say at 50Hz), you will loose much bass response."If it measures good and sounds bad, it is bad. If it measures bad and sounds good, you are measuring the wrong things."
Comment
-
Originally posted by catalin gramada View Post
That is strange. I quick wired the circuit and did a quick measurement at 40 hz and need 100 mV open loop and 1 V with feedback conected to drive the amp at clipping for 60Vpk output into 8 ohm load. Almost 20 db at 40 hz, 6 db around at 250 hz...
But do you really want that much drop in bass frequency response?- Own Opinions Only -
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Helmholtz View Post
But do you really want that much drop in bass frequency response?
Thanks all.Last edited by catalin gramada; 06-01-2021, 06:57 PM."If it measures good and sounds bad, it is bad. If it measures bad and sounds good, you are measuring the wrong things."
- Likes 1
Comment
Comment