Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Noise problem

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    As long as DCV at the input end of the cap is constant, the voltage at the output end should be zero when referenced to ground by a resistor.
    As said, an electrolytic cap might not be suitable here.
    - Own Opinions Only -

    Comment


    • #17
      This I.m afraid, The dcv in cathode is not consistent. The x axis on my scope is swinging random up and down at the output of coupling cap, sometimes slow, sometimes fast...with a max+/- 0.4v dc amplitude sometimes, sometimes less...This high 0.4v amplitude is over a 2M load in parallel with my scope input of course. Fast time constant may help to suppress the transients...who knows...?
      Last edited by catalin gramada; 04-17-2022, 05:03 AM.
      "If it measures good and sounds bad, it is bad. If it measures bad and sounds good, you are measuring the wrong things."

      Comment


      • #18
        Click image for larger version

Name:	20220417_085008_1.gif
Views:	182
Size:	3.13 MB
ID:	958412 ..
        "If it measures good and sounds bad, it is bad. If it measures bad and sounds good, you are measuring the wrong things."

        Comment


        • #19
          I'd bet your B+ is also bouncing like that.
          Education is what you're left with after you have forgotten what you have learned.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Enzo View Post
            I'd bet your B+ is also bouncing like that.
            You mean Green Energy ? Hell, I.ll check late, thx. The Russian power was better and cheaper by half.
            I thought is a circuit related problem...
            Last edited by catalin gramada; 04-17-2022, 11:25 AM.
            "If it measures good and sounds bad, it is bad. If it measures bad and sounds good, you are measuring the wrong things."

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Enzo View Post
              I'd bet your B+ is also bouncing like that.
              I think it would require rather large B+ fluctuation to cause this effect.
              Reason is that a CF uses heavy local NFB, which makes its output a constant voltage source with good suppression of B+ variations.
              Bottom line: A CF has excellent self-stabilizing properties.

              A while ago I saw similar DC level fluctuations with a LTPI. Reason was the tube (which tested perfectly good!).

              Apart from that, I don't think such slow fluctuations should be audible.
              Last edited by Helmholtz; 04-17-2022, 04:41 PM.
              - Own Opinions Only -

              Comment


              • #22
                I have watched B+ jumping around from mains variation for years. Seemed like it might apply here. Just the bouncy part, not the HF hash.
                Education is what you're left with after you have forgotten what you have learned.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Enzo View Post
                  I have watched B+ jumping around from mains variation for years. Seemed like it might apply here. Just the bouncy part, not the HF hash.
                  Sure, B+ varies with mains variation, typically by a few volts per minute.
                  I'd expect a CF to suppress B+ variations by roughly the intrinsic gain of the tube, meaning a factor of 100 with a 12AX7.
                  Last edited by Helmholtz; 04-17-2022, 05:05 PM.
                  - Own Opinions Only -

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    I find mains bouncing at similar rates to the scope display. Whenever a large motor starts or other surge demand, the mains will pulse up and down. Many times a novice scope user will put the scope on AC coupling to ;look at a small amount of ripple and wonder why the B+ "was so unstable". The display is only moving a few millivolts. A one volt kink in the mains typically results in a 4 or 5 volt blip on the B+.
                    Education is what you're left with after you have forgotten what you have learned.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      The tube used was a 12bh7 biased for 8 mA around. The fluctuations comes to 0.4v sometimes, sometimes less than 10 mV and is completly random, meant have not any timing consistence.
                      Last edited by catalin gramada; 04-17-2022, 05:26 PM.
                      "If it measures good and sounds bad, it is bad. If it measures bad and sounds good, you are measuring the wrong things."

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        I don't exclude the mains voltage influence.
                        But to me the cathode voltage fluctuations look a bit too fast (as the filter caps will slow down B+ variations) and too large at maybe +/- 0.1V

                        I might be wrong. though.
                        Last edited by Helmholtz; 04-17-2022, 05:27 PM.
                        - Own Opinions Only -

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          I just offer it as a thought. A quick look with a scope takes less time than the discussion.
                          Education is what you're left with after you have forgotten what you have learned.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Yes, B+ on its supply point bouncing as same as Enzo said.
                            "If it measures good and sounds bad, it is bad. If it measures bad and sounds good, you are measuring the wrong things."

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by catalin gramada View Post
                              Yes, B+ on its supply point bouncing as same as Enzo said.
                              How much, how fast?
                              Did you use 2 scope channels to verify simultaneity?

                              Always eager to learn.

                              How does the effect relate to your noise problem?
                              - Own Opinions Only -

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                I will try to record the plate and cathode simultaneously .
                                I really don't know, I started to do a noise diagnose and I get that to fix. Really don't know much the problems are related., if there are any.
                                Last edited by catalin gramada; 04-17-2022, 10:25 PM.
                                "If it measures good and sounds bad, it is bad. If it measures bad and sounds good, you are measuring the wrong things."

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X