I bought a Bogen CHB14A off eBay some years ago and it's been sitting on the shelf waiting until I had time to do something with it.
Well, now I have the time and now that I have had time to really look at the amp, I don't really like what I see.
The tube complement in this amp is an 6V4/EZ80 rectifier, a 6AU6A/EF94 preamp tube for the mic input and a pair of ECL86/6GW8 tubes.
The 6GW8/ECL86 choice for the power amp with their own built in driver was an economical idea I suppose but it's not exactly common, I don't think. At least, not in the world of guitar amps.
I've been looking at the condition (and doing some measuring of disconnected components) and nearly all of the passivle components need to be replaced as the caps are all mostly either shorted or open circuits, the four way can cap is no good with two shorted caps and two that are WAY off (rated at 10mf and measure to be close to 2mf on my capacitance meter). The resistors have drifted all over the place and one of the larger ones is a bit crumbly. So, it's all new passive stuff needed.
The heaters are all working so at least the 6.3v secondary on the PT works. I haven't checked the HT secondary to see what voltage it's putting out. And I haven't much idea what current this PT is capable of. Although I suspect I can back into that by adding up the current needs of the 6AU6 and the 6GW8s and use that figure as a ballpark.
I've no idea if the output tranny works at all. The amp would make no sounds with a speaker and mc hooked up when I first started fiddling with it. But that could just be because the circuits are dead. The power up test with no tubes didn't yield any sparks or a tripped breaker (the thing doesn't have a fuse). I'm getting 6.4V on the heater tap and 364V on the HT tap unloaded.
I have a complete new set of tubes for this. So, I could just rebuild it in its "standard" configuration and hope the output tranny works. I've already decided to put an IEC power entry jack on it. And add a fuse to it (this one does not have a fuse even though the manual says it does, right below he power cord -- but that area on the chassis is blank with no hole).
What I have rolling around in my head (yeah, it's lonely in there) is to convert this amp to use a pair of EL84s and to replace the 6AU6A pentode and its 7 pin socket with more common noval tubes, a 12AT7 as a PI for the EL84s and add a 12AX7 as a preamp tube. I'm also considering changing the EZ80 to an EZ81 but the EZ80 probably can handle all the current that the PT is capable of (another way to tell its current output, I suppose) so that change probably wouldn't net me anything even though I have one on head (well, three actually, but that's another story).
Anyway, I'm of two minds here. I could just rebuild the amp in its original configuration or convert it to a more "conventional" design and build it like a Marshall 20 watt. I'd have to change the pots on the front and lose the bass and treble switches in favor of pots. But I like having a three way tone stack. The cover would not fit, if I did this without dirlling holes for the pots.
I guess it would be more visually appealing to rebuild the amp as original, while leaving out the AUX inputs (and the mixing pot for them) and converting the output to use a cliff jack (or jacks) and changing the mic input to a couple of phono plugs for high and low impedance, too (probably also a cliff jacks).
Either way, I'm going to have to put in all new components. It will cost about he same either way since I already have all the tubes for either build (including the matched 12AT7). I will have to put in two new tube sockets if I change over to the EL84s since I'd need another pre-amp tube and the 6AU6A/EF94 is a septal (is that the correct term for a seven pin socket?) socket and would have to be replace with a noval for the 12AT7.
So, which way would you guys go? Go with the unusual that might sound like garbage and possibly have to deal with a lot of tweaking to get a good tone? Or go with a known good design and sound that "might" require some new iron?
I'm leaning toward the Marshall 20 watt design right now (I'm a Marshall fan, anyway -- most of my store bought amps [and gigging amps] have been Marshalls). But it's possible that the Bogen design might yield a sound that's good but "different".
Cheers,
Bruce
Well, now I have the time and now that I have had time to really look at the amp, I don't really like what I see.
The tube complement in this amp is an 6V4/EZ80 rectifier, a 6AU6A/EF94 preamp tube for the mic input and a pair of ECL86/6GW8 tubes.
The 6GW8/ECL86 choice for the power amp with their own built in driver was an economical idea I suppose but it's not exactly common, I don't think. At least, not in the world of guitar amps.
I've been looking at the condition (and doing some measuring of disconnected components) and nearly all of the passivle components need to be replaced as the caps are all mostly either shorted or open circuits, the four way can cap is no good with two shorted caps and two that are WAY off (rated at 10mf and measure to be close to 2mf on my capacitance meter). The resistors have drifted all over the place and one of the larger ones is a bit crumbly. So, it's all new passive stuff needed.
The heaters are all working so at least the 6.3v secondary on the PT works. I haven't checked the HT secondary to see what voltage it's putting out. And I haven't much idea what current this PT is capable of. Although I suspect I can back into that by adding up the current needs of the 6AU6 and the 6GW8s and use that figure as a ballpark.
I've no idea if the output tranny works at all. The amp would make no sounds with a speaker and mc hooked up when I first started fiddling with it. But that could just be because the circuits are dead. The power up test with no tubes didn't yield any sparks or a tripped breaker (the thing doesn't have a fuse). I'm getting 6.4V on the heater tap and 364V on the HT tap unloaded.
I have a complete new set of tubes for this. So, I could just rebuild it in its "standard" configuration and hope the output tranny works. I've already decided to put an IEC power entry jack on it. And add a fuse to it (this one does not have a fuse even though the manual says it does, right below he power cord -- but that area on the chassis is blank with no hole).
What I have rolling around in my head (yeah, it's lonely in there) is to convert this amp to use a pair of EL84s and to replace the 6AU6A pentode and its 7 pin socket with more common noval tubes, a 12AT7 as a PI for the EL84s and add a 12AX7 as a preamp tube. I'm also considering changing the EZ80 to an EZ81 but the EZ80 probably can handle all the current that the PT is capable of (another way to tell its current output, I suppose) so that change probably wouldn't net me anything even though I have one on head (well, three actually, but that's another story).
Anyway, I'm of two minds here. I could just rebuild the amp in its original configuration or convert it to a more "conventional" design and build it like a Marshall 20 watt. I'd have to change the pots on the front and lose the bass and treble switches in favor of pots. But I like having a three way tone stack. The cover would not fit, if I did this without dirlling holes for the pots.
I guess it would be more visually appealing to rebuild the amp as original, while leaving out the AUX inputs (and the mixing pot for them) and converting the output to use a cliff jack (or jacks) and changing the mic input to a couple of phono plugs for high and low impedance, too (probably also a cliff jacks).
Either way, I'm going to have to put in all new components. It will cost about he same either way since I already have all the tubes for either build (including the matched 12AT7). I will have to put in two new tube sockets if I change over to the EL84s since I'd need another pre-amp tube and the 6AU6A/EF94 is a septal (is that the correct term for a seven pin socket?) socket and would have to be replace with a noval for the 12AT7.
So, which way would you guys go? Go with the unusual that might sound like garbage and possibly have to deal with a lot of tweaking to get a good tone? Or go with a known good design and sound that "might" require some new iron?
I'm leaning toward the Marshall 20 watt design right now (I'm a Marshall fan, anyway -- most of my store bought amps [and gigging amps] have been Marshalls). But it's possible that the Bogen design might yield a sound that's good but "different".
Cheers,
Bruce
Comment