With my Bogen CHB14 project well under way, I've begun thinking about a project I've wanted to do for some time.
I have two Marshall Lead 12 amps. One is a combo which I have modified by putting output jacks on the back of the chassis and by adding an IEC power inlet and removing the stock power cord.
What I want to do, though is to turn both of these into tube amps. Ideally, I'd like to use the same amp design for both. Converting the combo isn't really a problem. There's plenty of room for transformers and tubes to hang down into the speaker chamber.
But the head is another kettle of fish entirely. The entire vertical space in the head is only 5.25 inches. The chassis that's in there is a "dish" which means it's laid out exactly like the one in the combo. All the electronics are on the inside of the "dish" which has an open top for cooling.
The vertical depth of the chassis is 2.25 inches. It measures 12.75 by 6.25 inches.
By subtracting the chassis height from the vertical space you see that that leaves exactly 3 inches. Really not enough clearance even if there was something to on top to mount the tubes, etc. to.
Yesterday, while installing the cliff jacks on my CBH14 chassis, I had an idea that I thought I would run by you guys and see what issues I may have missed as to why it's a daft idea.
Basically, the idea is to not try to modify the existing chassis but still use it. To do this, I would use a .125" aluminum plate that's 4"x11.5" This will leave enough room to clear the cliff jacks, fuse holder and IEC power in the rear as well as clear the cliff jacks, power switch and pots in the front.
By putting the plate on 1.25" standoffs, I can then mount a circuit board and power supply board underneath it, and mount the transformers (Hammond 270EX and Hammond 125E) as well as four noval sockets for the preamp tubes and the two EL84s.
What I want to build into this amp chassis is a Marshall 20W PA but with lower voltages to get less power output and less heat.
I am concerned about trying to stick too much into this chassis and having heat problems. I can use quick disconnects/screw mounts to make the plate easier to get in and out. I would also have to put some aluminum foil on the top inside of the cabinet to keep from cooking the wood.
By using a .125 aluminum plate and 1.25" standoffs, that will leave me with 3.875 (3 and 7/8) inches of clearance for the trannies and the tubes. The height of the EL84s is about 2.9 inches (3.10 on the socket) and the PT is 3.06 inches tall. I could raise the plate height a little (maybe .125) to give more clearance to the components underneath. But I don't think that would leave enough clearance for the tubes. I'm looking for "flush" mounting tube sockets to lower the tubes by the .25" normally taken by the sockets. I know these exist because my Bogen amp uses them.
Again, too much heat is my main concern, followed by the cramped quarters for all the components. Arcing is not a good thing.
Does this sound practical at all or would there be heat/hum problems. I am concerned about air circulation building this in a "tub". I would be replacing the piece of wood that normally closes the back with heavy wire mesh that is all I have left over from a JCM800 amp that I bought for parts long ago.
Also if anyone has a better idea for transformers that might have enough power (250-0-250 HT 100ma, 6.3v 2A minimum) and a 15W PP OT, I would welcome your suggestions. I haven't bought the trannies, yet, since this is still in the planning stage. A Hammond 270DX fits the requirements above (and has 5v as well that I don't need). But it's just as tall and only slightly smaller.
I was considering using an EZ81 instead of a bridge rectifier, but that would require another amp of heater current (3A). The 270EX has that (and 275 HT as well), but I'm trying to minimize the components and get as clean power as I can. I can use a bigger initial cap in the PS if I go with the bridge.
I pretty much have to go with a standup PT since I will have to mount the PS and circuit boards on the bottom of the plate.
You may ask why I want to do this. I just think it would be cool to have a small Marshall head with a Marshall tube amp inside it instead of a SS amp. And building it this way, I can put all the original components back in the chassis and have only a few small holes in the bottom of the chassis if I decide to switch it back or it doesn't work.
I'm wide open to suggestions at this point since I have only done some preliminary work in measuring things and doing some drawings in AutoSketch to check clearances as well looking at the dimensions of lots of tubes and transformers.
I could do this in a larger head cabinet but then it wouldn't be a Marshall (design) amp in a Marshall cabinet. It would sound like a Marshall but it wouldn't look like one.
And the big kicker. I could have this Marshall tube amp head on top of my Marshall Lead 12 Micro Stack. Quite a novelty, there, I think.
I could have a taller custom cabinet built that looks like a Marshall JCM800 cabinet cut down in length, but without the Marshall badge. It wouldn't be as "cool". I'm also on a fixed income now that I'm disabled.
The whole project in the head cabinet might be impractical. But I'm still going to do it in the combo. I want to build the same amp in both, though, using all the same components. And have two variations of the same amp.
I'd love it if someone actually made a full stack like the JCM800 series but with lower (less than 15 watts) for home players and even for studio work. I don't play anymore (I can't) but I know several people who would love to have something like this.
Again, I'm open to suggestions, criticisms, questions, ideas, etc.
Cheers,
Bruce Lewis
I have two Marshall Lead 12 amps. One is a combo which I have modified by putting output jacks on the back of the chassis and by adding an IEC power inlet and removing the stock power cord.
What I want to do, though is to turn both of these into tube amps. Ideally, I'd like to use the same amp design for both. Converting the combo isn't really a problem. There's plenty of room for transformers and tubes to hang down into the speaker chamber.
But the head is another kettle of fish entirely. The entire vertical space in the head is only 5.25 inches. The chassis that's in there is a "dish" which means it's laid out exactly like the one in the combo. All the electronics are on the inside of the "dish" which has an open top for cooling.
The vertical depth of the chassis is 2.25 inches. It measures 12.75 by 6.25 inches.
By subtracting the chassis height from the vertical space you see that that leaves exactly 3 inches. Really not enough clearance even if there was something to on top to mount the tubes, etc. to.
Yesterday, while installing the cliff jacks on my CBH14 chassis, I had an idea that I thought I would run by you guys and see what issues I may have missed as to why it's a daft idea.
Basically, the idea is to not try to modify the existing chassis but still use it. To do this, I would use a .125" aluminum plate that's 4"x11.5" This will leave enough room to clear the cliff jacks, fuse holder and IEC power in the rear as well as clear the cliff jacks, power switch and pots in the front.
By putting the plate on 1.25" standoffs, I can then mount a circuit board and power supply board underneath it, and mount the transformers (Hammond 270EX and Hammond 125E) as well as four noval sockets for the preamp tubes and the two EL84s.
What I want to build into this amp chassis is a Marshall 20W PA but with lower voltages to get less power output and less heat.
I am concerned about trying to stick too much into this chassis and having heat problems. I can use quick disconnects/screw mounts to make the plate easier to get in and out. I would also have to put some aluminum foil on the top inside of the cabinet to keep from cooking the wood.
By using a .125 aluminum plate and 1.25" standoffs, that will leave me with 3.875 (3 and 7/8) inches of clearance for the trannies and the tubes. The height of the EL84s is about 2.9 inches (3.10 on the socket) and the PT is 3.06 inches tall. I could raise the plate height a little (maybe .125) to give more clearance to the components underneath. But I don't think that would leave enough clearance for the tubes. I'm looking for "flush" mounting tube sockets to lower the tubes by the .25" normally taken by the sockets. I know these exist because my Bogen amp uses them.
Again, too much heat is my main concern, followed by the cramped quarters for all the components. Arcing is not a good thing.
Does this sound practical at all or would there be heat/hum problems. I am concerned about air circulation building this in a "tub". I would be replacing the piece of wood that normally closes the back with heavy wire mesh that is all I have left over from a JCM800 amp that I bought for parts long ago.
Also if anyone has a better idea for transformers that might have enough power (250-0-250 HT 100ma, 6.3v 2A minimum) and a 15W PP OT, I would welcome your suggestions. I haven't bought the trannies, yet, since this is still in the planning stage. A Hammond 270DX fits the requirements above (and has 5v as well that I don't need). But it's just as tall and only slightly smaller.
I was considering using an EZ81 instead of a bridge rectifier, but that would require another amp of heater current (3A). The 270EX has that (and 275 HT as well), but I'm trying to minimize the components and get as clean power as I can. I can use a bigger initial cap in the PS if I go with the bridge.
I pretty much have to go with a standup PT since I will have to mount the PS and circuit boards on the bottom of the plate.
You may ask why I want to do this. I just think it would be cool to have a small Marshall head with a Marshall tube amp inside it instead of a SS amp. And building it this way, I can put all the original components back in the chassis and have only a few small holes in the bottom of the chassis if I decide to switch it back or it doesn't work.
I'm wide open to suggestions at this point since I have only done some preliminary work in measuring things and doing some drawings in AutoSketch to check clearances as well looking at the dimensions of lots of tubes and transformers.
I could do this in a larger head cabinet but then it wouldn't be a Marshall (design) amp in a Marshall cabinet. It would sound like a Marshall but it wouldn't look like one.
And the big kicker. I could have this Marshall tube amp head on top of my Marshall Lead 12 Micro Stack. Quite a novelty, there, I think.
I could have a taller custom cabinet built that looks like a Marshall JCM800 cabinet cut down in length, but without the Marshall badge. It wouldn't be as "cool". I'm also on a fixed income now that I'm disabled.
The whole project in the head cabinet might be impractical. But I'm still going to do it in the combo. I want to build the same amp in both, though, using all the same components. And have two variations of the same amp.
I'd love it if someone actually made a full stack like the JCM800 series but with lower (less than 15 watts) for home players and even for studio work. I don't play anymore (I can't) but I know several people who would love to have something like this.
Again, I'm open to suggestions, criticisms, questions, ideas, etc.
Cheers,
Bruce Lewis
Comment