Has anyone measured the output power on a 5e3 or similar amp? I built a 5c3, part 5b3 and part 5e3. Parts were scrounged, i think the output trans was from a 1962 Lowery organ which i know had push pull 6v6's. Original speaker was gone and a 8 ohm Oakland or Oakford was in there, which had foam surround so i know it was newer than the amp. Here is whats happening, on a scope i can get about 5 watts clean, little more if badly clipping. That is into a 8 ohm dummy load. If i up the ohms to 16, i can get over 10 watts clean. So the output section is happier with the 16 ohms. Makes me wonder if the output trans i am using was originally using a 16 ohm speaker. Plate voltage is a bit low at 325 and screen at 280, but if i use a 5v4 and 5e3 power supply resistors (365 plate 340 screen) i can get more wattage (14.5w dirty) but still it's happier at 16 ohm load. Any thoughts? I do have 680 ohm screen resistors in there, should i lower them or remove them?
Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
5C3 output power
Collapse
X
-
Removed the 680 screen resistors, wattage into 16 ohms is 11.3w. Plate voltage doesn't sag with signal, stays at 365. screens drop from 340 to 300. One other thing i noticed is 120v line wattage, it draws about 72 watts idle, only goes up to 73-74 wide open. 22v on cathode doesn't really change unless i go to 8 ohms. Swapped in 6l6's, switched to 8 ohms, smoked the load resistors a little, plate drops 10 volts just plugging them in, drops another 10 under signal. Line draw with 6l6's is 80 watts, goes up to 100w under signal. Cathode is 25v, plate 355v.
-
Originally posted by mozz View PostHas anyone measured the output power on a 5e3 or similar amp?
"A proper running 5E3, clone or not, with close to "classic corrected voltages" through out the B+ rail, will make around 10-12 watts max."
I think you need to run it with a 16 ohm load.
Comment
-
Just found a web page that tells you how to figure impedance approx from turns ratio. So, according to my latest experiment, i come up with a 3,7k load primary into 8 ohms secondary. That is much lower than the usual 6.6k or 8k transformer recommended for 6v6 types. Now, if i use a 16 ohm speaker, that will double my primary and make it see 7.4k, which is right on the money. So, this transformer has to come out or i have to buy another speaker. I have a 6bq5 push pull transformer here, will do my experiment again and see what this impedance is going to be. I have some 12" speakers, a old utah with no labels which measures about 5 ohms, so i think it's a 4 ohm speaker, and another 60's speaker which i measure at 7.3 ohms, i think that one is 8 ohms. I was using the utah in this deluxe cabinet. The 6bq5 transformer was from a hammond organ so i should be able to see if my impedance measurements coincide with any info i can find on the hammond. I'll be happy with 10 or 11 watts.
Comment
-
Originally posted by mozz View PostSo, this transformer has to come out or i have to buy another speaker.
You could build something like a 2x10" or 2X12" cab with really efficient speakers to plug it into for gigs and enjoy the lower output from the built in speaker for home practice
I wouldn't be surprised if an efficient 2X12 at 16R cabinet was twice as loud as the 'comparable to Utah' speaker of the incorrect impedance you have in there. The extra surface area and efficiency work the same way. It'll be MUCH louder. And may even have better tone to boot. I know you may not need that much more volume, but it is a way to make the amp more versatile and improve clean tone loudness. Albiet expensive. Cabinets build cheap enough, but good sounding efficient speakers will be between $85 and $140 each. Ouch! But if you stick with $85 units (Like a pair of Emi Cannabis Rex's) and build your own cab (natural finish, salvage grill cloth, cheap corners) you could do it for about $210. That could be a lot of fun for the money."Take two placebos, works twice as well." Enzo
"Now get off my lawn with your silicooties and boom-chucka speakers and computers masquerading as amplifiers" Justin Thomas
"If you're not interested in opinions and the experience of others, why even start a thread?
You can't just expect consent." Helmholtz
Comment
-
Originally posted by mozz View Posta old utah with no labels which measures about 5 ohms, so i think it's a 4 ohm speaker, and another 60's speaker which i measure at 7.3 ohms, i think that one is 8 ohms.
Double check your readings to be sure. Also check the reading with the probes shorted and subtract any probe resistance from your measurements.Originally posted by EnzoI have a sign in my shop that says, "Never think up reasons not to check something."
Comment
-
Originally posted by g1 View PostI don't think I've ever seen a speaker that measures a DC resistance of more than it's rated impedance. So I would be more inclined to think the one that measures 5 ohms is an 8ohm speaker.
Double check your readings to be sure. Also check the reading with the probes shorted and subtract any probe resistance from your measurements.
Comment
-
Which primary did you use? And how does it sound? I've never even heard of Musical Power Supplies."Take two placebos, works twice as well." Enzo
"Now get off my lawn with your silicooties and boom-chucka speakers and computers masquerading as amplifiers" Justin Thomas
"If you're not interested in opinions and the experience of others, why even start a thread?
You can't just expect consent." Helmholtz
Comment
-
Actually i put a dpdt switch in there so i can switch between the windings. The power transformer is oversized so running 6l6 doesn't overheat it. I have gotten 26-28 watts with the 6l6's. I found Musical power supplies has "very" decent prices on transformers. I was surprised how nice it was made and very heavy sized wires, they will be getting much more business from me. Didn't get to play it much yesterday when it was finished, but today i have a few hours, never got to try anything with humbuckers in this yet but will today to see how it breaks up.
Comment
Comment