I agree with Tom's assessment in post #2 about the LDR resistive element. Have you tried disconnecting one end of the LDR resistive side?
Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Gain Difference between Vibrato & Normal Ch on Fender Twin & Deluxe Reverb
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by g1 View PostI agree with Tom's assessment in post #2 about the LDR resistive element. Have you tried disconnecting one end of the LDR resistive side?
No, the issue that still stands is WHY have I been seeing this difference in gain between Vibrato Ch vs the Normal Ch over time. I see in all of the schematics I have of both Deluxe and Twin Reverb amps the same resistors used in the tube stages, tone circuits, reverb circuits and vibrato Intensity circuits. In time, I may find what it is. This is mostly just one of those things I've come to notice and isn't a problem to any of our clients using our rental stock of amps. I have way too much to do to keep up with the repairs/maintenance demands than treating this observation as a hot project to solve. As stated before, just one of those things that make ya go hmmmmmm.......Logic is an organized way of going wrong with confidence
Comment
-
Originally posted by nevetslab View Post... the issue that still stands is WHY have I been seeing this difference in gain between Vibrato Ch vs the Normal Ch over time."Take two placebos, works twice as well." Enzo
"Now get off my lawn with your silicooties and boom-chucka speakers and computers masquerading as amplifiers" Justin Thomas
"If you're not interested in opinions and the experience of others, why even start a thread?
You can't just expect consent." Helmholtz
- Likes 1
Comment
-
re: The trem roach:
The reverb mix triode plate is always playing into the 50k pot load. Leo reports that the trem may be set to two or three in the testing. All that needs to be done to see if the trem roach resistance is responsible would be to set the vibrato intensity to zero and recheck gain for either channel. At that point the roach is entirely eliminated from the circuit.
"Take two placebos, works twice as well." Enzo
"Now get off my lawn with your silicooties and boom-chucka speakers and computers masquerading as amplifiers" Justin Thomas
"If you're not interested in opinions and the experience of others, why even start a thread?
You can't just expect consent." Helmholtz
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Do the AC voltages under test conditions match the re-issue schematic? (2.7VAC vs 3.8VAC)
I'm wondering if it may be just poor tolerance on the newer volume pots. You would have to find a way to control for pot variance in your comparisons.Originally posted by EnzoI have a sign in my shop that says, "Never think up reasons not to check something."
Comment
-
I'm wondering if there isn't a difference in the roach resistance for newer units? That's why I'd like to know the results of testing with the vibrato channel intensity set to zero. If Leo has been testing with the vibrato channel intensity set at two or three (considering it's a reverse ausio taper pot) a low roach resistance for newer units could make a considerable difference. And...
From what I've read the "off" resistance for the older trem roach was about two megs. So where do the newer units read? And are they prone to low resistance as a failure mode? Possibly an early failure mode?Last edited by Chuck H; 08-03-2024, 05:11 AM."Take two placebos, works twice as well." Enzo
"Now get off my lawn with your silicooties and boom-chucka speakers and computers masquerading as amplifiers" Justin Thomas
"If you're not interested in opinions and the experience of others, why even start a thread?
You can't just expect consent." Helmholtz
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chuck H View PostI'm wondering if there isn't a difference in the roach resistance for newer units? That's why I'd like to know the results of testing with the vibrato channel intensity set to zero. If Leo has been testing with the vibrato channel intensity set at two or three (considering it's a reverse ausio taper pot) a low roach resistance for newer units could make a considerable difference. And...
From what I've read the "off" resistance for the older trem roach was about two megs. So where do the newer units read? And are they prone to low resistance as a failure mode? Possibly an early failure mode?
I didn't notice any significant difference in the Intensity setting of the Tremolo being turned on, set to around '2 to 3'. Granted, I'm looking at the RMS average acoustic level (RMS SLOW) to Pink Noise, so there's a fluctuation of around 1dB during the burst 'ON' time during the measurement. Amp chassis is normally in the chassis during these measurements, though sometimes, it may be on the service cradle when dealing with the issues it came in for.
I will look into this issue on the range of resistance of the LDR portion of the roach, as well as the effects of the loading as the Intensity is turned up. I rarely have it up to levels like we heard in that aged tune ''Rumble" from the 50's or early 60's.Logic is an organized way of going wrong with confidence
Comment
Comment