Alex,
As I and Enzo were saying, you most likely have a "wrong phase" problem ( PFB loop ), and I think it has been that way from the beginning, as Steve says. As long as you have to check the signal's phase only, and not its amplitude, you can "ignore" your scope's accuracy problems IMHO. You can either use the two channels of a scope, even if not perfectly calibrated, or a single channel scope taking the two readings separately. Your goal is to obtain a perfectly still image of the waveforms, it will be simple then to check whether the second waveform is "in phase" ( bad ) or not ( good ) with respect to the first one.
Also, as per Enzo' s advice, check the waveforms for the presence of oscillations ( in your case they're above the audible frequencies' range ), caused by the PFB. They're so nasty that, though we don't hear them, they can be of a severe hindrance to an amp, and a scope is the only way to physically "see" them.
HTH
Best regards
Bob
As I and Enzo were saying, you most likely have a "wrong phase" problem ( PFB loop ), and I think it has been that way from the beginning, as Steve says. As long as you have to check the signal's phase only, and not its amplitude, you can "ignore" your scope's accuracy problems IMHO. You can either use the two channels of a scope, even if not perfectly calibrated, or a single channel scope taking the two readings separately. Your goal is to obtain a perfectly still image of the waveforms, it will be simple then to check whether the second waveform is "in phase" ( bad ) or not ( good ) with respect to the first one.
Also, as per Enzo' s advice, check the waveforms for the presence of oscillations ( in your case they're above the audible frequencies' range ), caused by the PFB. They're so nasty that, though we don't hear them, they can be of a severe hindrance to an amp, and a scope is the only way to physically "see" them.
HTH
Best regards
Bob
Comment