After replacing all the IRFP240-IRFP9240 in one side plus just about every source and gate resistor, a few drivers ,15v zeners and other misc resistors finally there's no DC on the output (well a few mV)and signal goes in and out (one side slightly more) .
According to the service notes should adjust for approx 25mV across the .47 5w "source resistors".
First question .Do they mean 25mV plus or minus 5mV
Quote
"Bias adjustment with no signal and no load.
Adjust AP101 to obtain an average of 25_ + 5mv across R139,R140,R146,R147,152,153,158,159,164 & 165."
I'm assuming they couldn't line up the + and - over the top of one another in the print process.
I assume therefore anything from 20mv to 30mv is ok but preference should be given to the low side..
meaning if they are all heading towards 30 it's a good idea to back it off slightly.
I'm running the thing through a 200w (240v)light bulb which is about a quarter lit (new test terminology! )which gives me approx 60volts DC on the drains... instead of the aprox 80 volts I should get with no light bulb limiting.
I figured out to put one test probe in-between the heatsinks to where the 0.47 5 watters join (spkr output)
and the other I can clip onto the source of the output devices on the outer side of the heat sink.
My dilemma is this
At 60v aprox some of the fets are conducting about 23mA (the two in the centre) while the others are much lower ,4 to 9 mv.
Measuring on the good side (the one that didn't blow) am getting less variation 8 to 19mv approx.
At this stage neither trim pot has been touched.
Have tried it into a dummy load (8 ohms) and the sine wave looks symetrical but as lamp limited soon as I crank it "she go crazy" well it wants more power supply and relays click off and come back on as I would expect.. makes a good light show !
I'm hesitant to apply full juice as I expected the bias readings across the 0.47 5watters to be more consistant.
Does this mean I have to buy bags of fets to match them into lots of 5 ?
Or should I stop being so fussy and plug it in and "rock on" as I've heard mentioned...?
The amp was only just out of warranty ,is well looked after and just smoked for no reason one night.
any help in this area appreciated.
According to the service notes should adjust for approx 25mV across the .47 5w "source resistors".
First question .Do they mean 25mV plus or minus 5mV
Quote
"Bias adjustment with no signal and no load.
Adjust AP101 to obtain an average of 25_ + 5mv across R139,R140,R146,R147,152,153,158,159,164 & 165."
I'm assuming they couldn't line up the + and - over the top of one another in the print process.
I assume therefore anything from 20mv to 30mv is ok but preference should be given to the low side..
meaning if they are all heading towards 30 it's a good idea to back it off slightly.
I'm running the thing through a 200w (240v)light bulb which is about a quarter lit (new test terminology! )which gives me approx 60volts DC on the drains... instead of the aprox 80 volts I should get with no light bulb limiting.
I figured out to put one test probe in-between the heatsinks to where the 0.47 5 watters join (spkr output)
and the other I can clip onto the source of the output devices on the outer side of the heat sink.
My dilemma is this
At 60v aprox some of the fets are conducting about 23mA (the two in the centre) while the others are much lower ,4 to 9 mv.
Measuring on the good side (the one that didn't blow) am getting less variation 8 to 19mv approx.
At this stage neither trim pot has been touched.
Have tried it into a dummy load (8 ohms) and the sine wave looks symetrical but as lamp limited soon as I crank it "she go crazy" well it wants more power supply and relays click off and come back on as I would expect.. makes a good light show !
I'm hesitant to apply full juice as I expected the bias readings across the 0.47 5watters to be more consistant.
Does this mean I have to buy bags of fets to match them into lots of 5 ?
Or should I stop being so fussy and plug it in and "rock on" as I've heard mentioned...?
The amp was only just out of warranty ,is well looked after and just smoked for no reason one night.
any help in this area appreciated.
Comment