I repaired a VS 8080 for a fellow awhile back. It was in fantastic condition, just repaired a few dry solders joints, and it worked well after that.
About 3 or so months later he called back saying it had stopped working.
I loaned him my 8080 test amp, and grabbed his back for a look. I traced it down to IC1, popped a socket in, and replaced the IC, and it was all good again. I gave it a thorough playing with a couple of guitars to test. I also replaced all the power section electrolytics for good measure.
In the meantime the loaner amp failed. This amp is a little modified, so I wondered if my mods had taken something out in the preamp, but when I got it back it had the same symptoms. I replaced IC1 and it was fine again.
Then his amp failed again with the same symptoms, within a short timeframe.
My gut feeling is that something being plugged into it is taking it out. Given that the exact same fault has occurred on two different 8080's, it seems unlikely that it is a pure coincidence.
He is a little concerned, which is understandable, as his small Peavy practice amp (I'll chase its details up) works with the same setup without failing. I'm thinking it has a more robust input section for whatever reason.
I asked him if anything was changed gear wise around the time of the first failure, and he had started using a loop pedal, and something else I can't recall. I'll chase these details up also.
Preamp - http://www.drtube.com/schematics/marshall/pc0689.pdf
Power Amp - http://www.drtube.com/schematics/marshall/pc0689p.pdf
My questions are as follows:
1/ Has anyone else come across this fault? Is it common? I haven't found it in any of the other 8080 posts that I've read.
2/ If this is a weakness, any suggestions as to how I can make this section more robust without affecting the signal? Some kind of buffer pre IC1 perhaps?
3/ I was going to take the loaner back, tell him to plug his pedals into the FX loop instead of the front end, and see how it stands up after that. Is it fair to say that the FX loop would be more robust as this is its intent, or will IC8 be the next candidate to start blowing (both IC1 & IC8 are TL072 or similar), or I barking up the wrong tree here?
Thanks.
About 3 or so months later he called back saying it had stopped working.
I loaned him my 8080 test amp, and grabbed his back for a look. I traced it down to IC1, popped a socket in, and replaced the IC, and it was all good again. I gave it a thorough playing with a couple of guitars to test. I also replaced all the power section electrolytics for good measure.
In the meantime the loaner amp failed. This amp is a little modified, so I wondered if my mods had taken something out in the preamp, but when I got it back it had the same symptoms. I replaced IC1 and it was fine again.
Then his amp failed again with the same symptoms, within a short timeframe.
My gut feeling is that something being plugged into it is taking it out. Given that the exact same fault has occurred on two different 8080's, it seems unlikely that it is a pure coincidence.
He is a little concerned, which is understandable, as his small Peavy practice amp (I'll chase its details up) works with the same setup without failing. I'm thinking it has a more robust input section for whatever reason.
I asked him if anything was changed gear wise around the time of the first failure, and he had started using a loop pedal, and something else I can't recall. I'll chase these details up also.
Preamp - http://www.drtube.com/schematics/marshall/pc0689.pdf
Power Amp - http://www.drtube.com/schematics/marshall/pc0689p.pdf
My questions are as follows:
1/ Has anyone else come across this fault? Is it common? I haven't found it in any of the other 8080 posts that I've read.
2/ If this is a weakness, any suggestions as to how I can make this section more robust without affecting the signal? Some kind of buffer pre IC1 perhaps?
3/ I was going to take the loaner back, tell him to plug his pedals into the FX loop instead of the front end, and see how it stands up after that. Is it fair to say that the FX loop would be more robust as this is its intent, or will IC8 be the next candidate to start blowing (both IC1 & IC8 are TL072 or similar), or I barking up the wrong tree here?
Thanks.
Comment