The final straw is that some amp designs are actually unstable at reduced supply voltage. The classic problem is that the output sticks to one of the rails, and as the supply voltage is raised, eventually it snaps to zero. Testing one of these on a light bulb limiter, you would think it was completely hosed, but in actual use it works fine apart from a large turn-on thump.
I've never seen one that is unstable in the common mode, turning both sets of output transistors on too hard at reduced supply voltage. But when a new designer wants to prove to the boss that he's hot stuff, anything is possible.
In this particular case, the diode generates a forward bias to turn the output transistors on. The op-amps have a gain of roughly 8, so 8 diode drops worth of bias are applied to the output transistors. But being Darlingtons they only need a total of 4 diode drops.
The extra 4 diode drops worth of bias are cancelled out by AP1 and its fixed resistor buddies. But the cancellation is dependent on the +/-16V rail voltage being correct. I think at reduced supply voltage there could be an excess of positive bias.
If this turns out to be correct, I guess I'll send my consulting fee straight to Crate.
I've never seen one that is unstable in the common mode, turning both sets of output transistors on too hard at reduced supply voltage. But when a new designer wants to prove to the boss that he's hot stuff, anything is possible.
In this particular case, the diode generates a forward bias to turn the output transistors on. The op-amps have a gain of roughly 8, so 8 diode drops worth of bias are applied to the output transistors. But being Darlingtons they only need a total of 4 diode drops.
The extra 4 diode drops worth of bias are cancelled out by AP1 and its fixed resistor buddies. But the cancellation is dependent on the +/-16V rail voltage being correct. I think at reduced supply voltage there could be an excess of positive bias.
If this turns out to be correct, I guess I'll send my consulting fee straight to Crate.
Comment