At the risk of sounding stupid in some people's eyes I will ask anyway........ I get confused with this procedure..probably because I don't do it enough.....when calculating the amount of bias, you go by the plate voltage in the particular unit....not the maximum rated plate voltage that is stated in the tube manual.......right........Let's take a KT88......the maximum plate voltage is 800V...the max. plate current is 230mA, and maximum power dissipation is 42Watts...that is what is on the data sheet that I have......So I have a set of KT88's running at 550 plate voltage...with a cathode current of 80mA...in order for me to calculate the proper bias value, I need to stay under 70% of that maximum....42X70% is 29.4Watts......so that is 70%......So....Plate voltage X plate current equals the plate dissipation......550V X 80mA is 44.4 Watts.....that is for two tubes.....so for one tube, provided that they are matched fairly close, should be around 22 Watts......so the 80mA setting is roughly 50%....it could stand to go a tad higher......right......and the actual negative voltage at the wiper arm of the bias pot is about -63V...the schematic states -55V and if you turn it down to -55V then the plate current increases to somewhere around 123mA....550 X 123mA is 67.5 Watts or roughly 33watts for each tube.....that is higher than 70% of the maximum......Don`t forget that there is screen current but for the math I don`t think that would throw the calculations off by too much......so I didn`t include it......so am I on the right track here.......
Cheers......
P.S. I just thought about it some more....Correct me if I am wrong, but when I changed the bias setting from -63 down to -55V, I was supposed to measure the plate voltage and redo the calculations.....but I used the previous measured plate voltage reading of 550.....
Cheers......
P.S. I just thought about it some more....Correct me if I am wrong, but when I changed the bias setting from -63 down to -55V, I was supposed to measure the plate voltage and redo the calculations.....but I used the previous measured plate voltage reading of 550.....
Comment