Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Original JTM45 re-cap & re-tube

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Original JTM45 re-cap & re-tube

    I finally got to power this up today to check voltages and unloaded they don't look too bad. I am a little concerned about the bias cap voltages though, they are different

    C1 - 514v - 32mfd (can)
    C2 - 522v - 32mfd (can)
    C3 - 479v - 32mfd (can)
    C4 - 498v - 16mfd
    C5 - -48v - 8mfd (bias)
    C6 - -61v - 8mfd (bias)

    Why would the bias caps be different voltages? All the resistors checked out within 10% tolerance of their values.

    I think I just answered my own question, there is a 15K resistor between them. Coming off the 220K from the power tubes there is -48v so I think I'm good there.
    --Jim


    He's like a new set of strings... he just needs to be stretched a bit.

  • #2
    That's correct. Then after the second cap (the -48 one) there should be a resistor or trimpot (or both) going to ground. This is what sets the actual bias voltage (currently -48).
    Originally posted by Enzo
    I have a sign in my shop that says, "Never think up reasons not to check something."


    Comment


    • #3
      I've got 458v on the Tung Sol KT66s pins 3 and 453v on pins 4, Tung Sol's data sheet says not to go over 450v on the grid. I know it's only 3v but I like to be safe.

      The bias is at -48v on pins 5, which seems high to me. Aren't they supposed to be in the high 30s at 450v on the plates?
      --Jim


      He's like a new set of strings... he just needs to be stretched a bit.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by gui_tarzan View Post
        I've got 458v on the Tung Sol KT66s pins 3 and 453v on pins 4, Tung Sol's data sheet says not to go over 450v on the grid. I know it's only 3v but I like to be safe.
        You must be kidding

        The bias is at -48v on pins 5, which seems high to me. Aren't they supposed to be in the high 30s at 450v on the plates?
        Maybe, maybe not, that´s not the main point.
        *The* parameter, of which bias voltage is just a rough indication, is cathode (plate) current.
        Juan Manuel Fahey

        Comment


        • #5
          OMG does this thing sound great! Smooth, tight bass, great mids and sparkly highs. I think I'm in love. lol!

          I'll hook it up to a couple of other speakers tomorrow, right now I'm playing it through a 30w Jensen out of a mid 60s organ and it is clean clean clean and sparkly. Might have a weak normal channel tube though, the volume is way down on it. It's loud on the second channel. These original Mullards really sound nice!

          Yes, I'm kidding about the 3v. You do mean "anode", not "cathode" for the plate, right?

          I'll also check the plate current tomorrow and see where it's at.
          --Jim


          He's like a new set of strings... he just needs to be stretched a bit.

          Comment


          • #6
            No he meant cathode. Plate current alone determines plate dissipation, but we often monitor tube current at the cathode, with an adaptor or an installed 1 ohm resistor. In that case, though we are thinking plate current, we are actually measuring cathode current, which includes a small screen current as well as the plate current. So you are right too, just Juan didn;t mis-state it.
            Education is what you're left with after you have forgotten what you have learned.

            Comment


            • #7
              Oh, ok. I see what he meant now. Yes, I've got the adapter, will check tomorrow.
              --Jim


              He's like a new set of strings... he just needs to be stretched a bit.

              Comment


              • #8
                I changed the 56K bias resistor to 47K and I have 40ma (measuring using the adapter) now so at 438v plate voltage it's running just a tad over 70%.
                --Jim


                He's like a new set of strings... he just needs to be stretched a bit.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by gui_tarzan View Post
                  OMG does this thing sound great! Smooth, tight bass, great mids and sparkly highs. I think I'm in love. lol!
                  From this you increased your idle current with the only advantage being decreased tube life .
                  Or did it improve the tone even more?
                  From the best sounding, you should decrease idle current (increase 56K value) until it has a negative impact on the tone.
                  Then you will have best tube life possible for the tone you like.
                  The 70% magic number is pretty meaningless aside from a rough "do not exceed" max. value.
                  Originally posted by Enzo
                  I have a sign in my shop that says, "Never think up reasons not to check something."


                  Comment


                  • #10
                    It sounds amazing. I tried a 27K and it sounded like crap.
                    --Jim


                    He's like a new set of strings... he just needs to be stretched a bit.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      My point was that if it doesn't sound any better than the 56K, stick with the 56K as you will get better tube life.
                      Originally posted by Enzo
                      I have a sign in my shop that says, "Never think up reasons not to check something."


                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Yeah, I got that. I'm going to put the 56K back in it before I take it back today. Thanks for the heads up.
                        --Jim


                        He's like a new set of strings... he just needs to be stretched a bit.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Took the amp back to the shop that hired me to fix it. They're ecstatic and very happy with the results. As am I. The guy that played an LP through it said "listen to those harmonics - they're sparkly!" lol!



                          This one makes me feel good, it's not just another Fender (not that Fenders aren't any good!) but a timeless classic. I'll probably never see another one like it but who knows? The word is starting to get out that I can actually repair these. Of course some of the credit goes to you guys for steering me in the right direction on some of the theory end and I greatly appreciate it.
                          Last edited by gui_tarzan; 08-12-2014, 02:16 AM.
                          --Jim


                          He's like a new set of strings... he just needs to be stretched a bit.

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X