I'd like to address a matter that comes up from time to time in my repair business.
(some names changed to protect the guilty)
A client brings in a Fenshall Hotstate Deluxe Bedroom amp, not a bad-sounding design to begin with as long as you keep it in the home and don't throw it around in cars and vans and warehouse parties.
All of its front panel controls are soldered directly to a printed circuit board (that may even be phenolic) so that every time the chassis flexes, the rigid joint between the pot and the PCB is further degraded.
If a jack breaks, it's an hour's labor just to get the board out so a new one can be installed.
The cabinet is particle board, so spilled liquids cause it to lose structural integrity.
It's obviously not designed to be roadworthy. If they keep touring it, it's going to quickly cost more in repairs than a new amp. I can keep fixing it, but at some point, it'll be a big wad of jumper patches.
Or someone brings in a Crampeg Super MOSFET Technology bass amp and I tell them that I won't touch it. Their parent company, LARD Technologies don't send schematics, and besides, I've had situations where I couldn't fix the infernal things even with the help of all the king's horses and all the king's men (at least Enzo and R.G. and the rest of the forum pros).
Or, more recently, a Bellringer Digital Muddling amp sold by a company with zero support for selling replacement parts.
So they ask me, okay, I'm making enough touring that I can retire this thing and get a better instrument. So, Euthymia, what should I buy?
I have answers for them (for instance, bass amp: vintage Sunn or Acoustic, guitar amp: SF Fender), but what about stuff they can buy new, at Guitard Centaur?
My criteria are: good sound, roadworthy construction and assembly, ease of servicing, support for non-factory-authorized service (such as your road amp tech) in the form of documentation and reasonable parts sales.
We talked in the past how it would be great if reliability and ease of service could be promoted as a marketable criterion. With the www, we have some ability to make this a reality.
Name names, tell what products hold up, which ones don't, which companies are willing to help when it breaks down, which ones are not.
Some kind of poll, perhaps? A chart, with the different criteria? What amps do we think are good (I won't say "recommend," because that carries too much baggage)?
What do y'all think?
I'd think that the boutique companies would be great on reliability, less great in documentation support, mostly use standard parts available readily. But what I'm really interested in is the mass-marketed ones.
For a real-life example, I seldom see Mesas in for repair (indicates they hold together), they are GREAT about replacement parts, do not release schematics for items still in production (although they do cut loose for their older stuff that's more likely to need repair anyway), their designs do not allow a technician to completely optimize tube performance, and often do not allow access to the solder side of the PCB without much surgery.
So, reliability 8, parts 9, documentation 7, serviceability 5.
(some names changed to protect the guilty)
A client brings in a Fenshall Hotstate Deluxe Bedroom amp, not a bad-sounding design to begin with as long as you keep it in the home and don't throw it around in cars and vans and warehouse parties.
All of its front panel controls are soldered directly to a printed circuit board (that may even be phenolic) so that every time the chassis flexes, the rigid joint between the pot and the PCB is further degraded.
If a jack breaks, it's an hour's labor just to get the board out so a new one can be installed.
The cabinet is particle board, so spilled liquids cause it to lose structural integrity.
It's obviously not designed to be roadworthy. If they keep touring it, it's going to quickly cost more in repairs than a new amp. I can keep fixing it, but at some point, it'll be a big wad of jumper patches.
Or someone brings in a Crampeg Super MOSFET Technology bass amp and I tell them that I won't touch it. Their parent company, LARD Technologies don't send schematics, and besides, I've had situations where I couldn't fix the infernal things even with the help of all the king's horses and all the king's men (at least Enzo and R.G. and the rest of the forum pros).
Or, more recently, a Bellringer Digital Muddling amp sold by a company with zero support for selling replacement parts.
So they ask me, okay, I'm making enough touring that I can retire this thing and get a better instrument. So, Euthymia, what should I buy?
I have answers for them (for instance, bass amp: vintage Sunn or Acoustic, guitar amp: SF Fender), but what about stuff they can buy new, at Guitard Centaur?
My criteria are: good sound, roadworthy construction and assembly, ease of servicing, support for non-factory-authorized service (such as your road amp tech) in the form of documentation and reasonable parts sales.
We talked in the past how it would be great if reliability and ease of service could be promoted as a marketable criterion. With the www, we have some ability to make this a reality.
Name names, tell what products hold up, which ones don't, which companies are willing to help when it breaks down, which ones are not.
Some kind of poll, perhaps? A chart, with the different criteria? What amps do we think are good (I won't say "recommend," because that carries too much baggage)?
What do y'all think?
I'd think that the boutique companies would be great on reliability, less great in documentation support, mostly use standard parts available readily. But what I'm really interested in is the mass-marketed ones.
For a real-life example, I seldom see Mesas in for repair (indicates they hold together), they are GREAT about replacement parts, do not release schematics for items still in production (although they do cut loose for their older stuff that's more likely to need repair anyway), their designs do not allow a technician to completely optimize tube performance, and often do not allow access to the solder side of the PCB without much surgery.
So, reliability 8, parts 9, documentation 7, serviceability 5.
Comment