Agreed. I reckon quality/durability/whatever you call it is at least SOMEWHAT dependent on how many fingers are in the pie?
I can say I've had very few warranty failures in my life, and with some TLC, very few failures of anything. Most of the actual failures or damage happen due to improper care, handling, or maintenance by the "middlemen." I aim usually for middle of the road, not the cheapest (quality, not price) not the highest, and I do okay. Specifically for gear, I figure if an amp's survived 40 years, it'll do me good.
Perhaps the real issue (it is for me, anyway) is NOT that This or That construction practice is more reliable than the other, but that This method <I> can repair myself, and That one I cannot. That's how I look at it, being poor... So I buy old-style construction amps.
But I do live by this rule: the more moving parts there are, the more likely it is to break and and cost more to fix.
Justin
I can say I've had very few warranty failures in my life, and with some TLC, very few failures of anything. Most of the actual failures or damage happen due to improper care, handling, or maintenance by the "middlemen." I aim usually for middle of the road, not the cheapest (quality, not price) not the highest, and I do okay. Specifically for gear, I figure if an amp's survived 40 years, it'll do me good.
Perhaps the real issue (it is for me, anyway) is NOT that This or That construction practice is more reliable than the other, but that This method <I> can repair myself, and That one I cannot. That's how I look at it, being poor... So I buy old-style construction amps.
But I do live by this rule: the more moving parts there are, the more likely it is to break and and cost more to fix.
Justin
Comment