Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Marshall JMP 50 watt model 1987 confirmation please

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    " You OT is an 784-128 an Early version of 139 which have no 4ohm winding but 100v output for PA aplication. It was designed for el34 use. You amp is a jtm 50 with no doubt 67 era"

    Actually, the markings on the OT are very difficult to read, but the last three numbers look more likely to be 139, not 128. This is why I think it may be a 4 ohm tap, not a 100v. And it is marked JMP on the front, so I would hesitate to call it a JTM 50. I have an email in to the folks at Marshall, we'll see if they can help. And for the record, there is nothing wrong with the customer's amp, he just wanted it looked at, and we decided since one of the original electrolytics was showing signs of residue leaking, it would not be a bad thing to replace the 5 on the board. The cans look to have already been replaced at some point, so we left those.

    There are no screen resistors, and I know some would recommend installing them, but I am not in a hurry to change anything in this one.
    It's weird, because it WAS working fine.....

    Comment


    • #17
      Can you read the serial number from back.please?if you have original 139 transformer is more hystorical close to jmp models. Wonder why they stiĺl used earlier output selector with 100v marks.maybe is a factory mistake.maybe one owner replaced it.a lot of confusion here.Who know? Cum 139 have 4ohm option instead.Replacing electrolitic caps is a must after so many years if you wait to use it
      Last edited by catalin gramada; 01-05-2016, 07:53 PM.
      "If it measures good and sounds bad, it is bad. If it measures bad and sounds good, you are measuring the wrong things."

      Comment


      • #18
        Serial no. is s/10637. Everything looks to be original. Personally, I am leaning towards the factory using up the old "100v" labeled selectors before they had new ones printed.
        It's weird, because it WAS working fine.....

        Comment

        Working...
        X