Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Seymour Duncan Convertible 2000

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Seymour Duncan Convertible 2000

    Hi,
    Can anyone assist please.
    I have a Convertible 2000 on the bench for repair, and have found C14 on the main board at right front (tant cap mustard) has gone up in flames.
    I have searched for a schemo, but have only found the older (100) version.
    I did find a link to DIYGUITARIST........but didn't work.
    Can anyone help me with a schemo or the value of C14.
    Many thanks
    John

  • #2
    If no one has that schem (or the memory of an elephant if they worked on one) it may be possible to approximate the value based on the circuit. If you can draw a rough schem of some of the surrounding circuit/s and state some reference to it's location it might be possible to get a few educated guesses and some discussion that ends in decent results.

    EDIT: I just looked at the only Convertible schematic I could find. It was from 1986. It was an incomplete schematic (because the different boards likely have their own reference?) but I managed to locate from C1 to C13 and from C15 to C40, but no C14 anywhere!?! So maybe I'm the victim of some cruel hoax or this weirdness is just circumstance. With my original suggestion standing, I'm outy.
    Last edited by Chuck H; 09-25-2016, 03:55 AM.
    "Take two placebos, works twice as well." Enzo

    "Now get off my lawn with your silicooties and boom-chucka speakers and computers masquerading as amplifiers" Justin Thomas

    "If you're not interested in opinions and the experience of others, why even start a thread?
    You can't just expect consent." Helmholtz

    Comment


    • #3
      22uf 16v Tantalum.

      I hate tantalums.


      nickb has the schematics at his site, here is the preamp portion from there:
      http://bmamps.com/Schematics/Seymour...000-Preamp.pdf

      Power amp:
      http://bmamps.com/Schematics/Seymour...0-PowerAmp.pdf
      Education is what you're left with after you have forgotten what you have learned.

      Comment


      • #4
        Enzo/Chuck.
        Many thanks for your replies.
        Enzo, the schemos are just the ticket, I thank you.
        Tants in my experience need a very stable power system around them, and quite often they seem to have a very variable working longevity.
        Many thanks again
        John

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by John G View Post
          Tants in my experience need a very stable power system around them, and quite often they seem to have a very variable working longevity.
          I don't see any advantage in replacing the tantalum cap with another tant, just use an ordinary electrolytic. Seen too many tants self-roasted for no reason. "Variable working longevity" indeed.
          This isn't the future I signed up for.

          Comment


          • #6
            Leo,
            You read my mind, there is now a standard electrolytic in its place.
            Cheers,
            John

            Comment


            • #7
              I am just now re-reading the terrific Bob Pease "Troubleshooting Analog Circuits". And he has a chapter on passives, and discusses the various factors in chosing tantalums or films or lytics. But really, any subtle advantages a tantalum might have vanish ina guitar amp. At least in my opinion.

              They are nice enough caps, but they will not tolerate ANY sort of abuse at all, like over voltage or reverse polarity.
              Education is what you're left with after you have forgotten what you have learned.

              Comment

              Working...
              X