Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Tantalum Capacitors

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by cjenrick View Post
    average was 100 boards a day. best record was 300 boards a day...
    So we're talking production testing, right?
    I hope you weren't doing an average of 100 repairs a day.
    And I sure hope you weren't doing an average of 100 field returns a day.

    -rb
    Last edited by rjb; 08-08-2017, 12:36 AM.
    DON'T FEED THE TROLLS!

    Comment


    • #17
      not production, troubleshooting.

      if you do the same circuit over and over, year after year, you pick up speed.

      in the early days the boards were hand stuffed and hand soldered. so there was some fallout.

      we could remove an 8 pin opamp in about 15 seconds, twist the chip off the leads with needle nose, heat the pins four at a time and slam the board down on a piece of cardboard before the solder hardened, can't spend all day rebuilding a solder sucker.

      de-soldering station? don't make me laugh.
      Last edited by cjenrick; 08-07-2017, 11:21 PM.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by cjenrick View Post
        ...we could remove an 8 pin opamp in about 15 seconds, twist the chip off the leads with needle nose, heat the pins four at a time and slam the board down on a piece of cardboard before the solder hardened, can't spend all day rebuilding a solder sucker.

        de-soldering station? don't make me laugh.
        That reminds me of a conversation with a TSA baggage inspector:

        "We can open any locked bag in about 15 seconds using the BF Screwdriver. Twist the latches off of the hinge with pliers and toss them into the metal recycling hopper, can't spend all day opening a suitcase.

        TSA-compliant keys? Don't make me laugh. The BFS opens everything."
        "Stand back, I'm holding a calculator." - chinrest

        "I happen to have an original 1955 Stratocaster! The neck and body have been replaced with top quality Warmoth parts, I upgraded the hardware and put in custom, hand wound pickups. It's fabulous. There's nothing like that vintage tone or owning an original." - Chuck H

        Comment


        • #19
          Jobs the BFS has done:

          Screwdriver
          Chisel
          Hammer
          Prybar
          Toilet Snake
          Cap Discharger
          Fingernail Cleaner
          Socket Holder cuz I'm too lazy to get a ratchet
          Drum Stick
          Air Hole Maker
          Oil Filter Removal Aid
          Staple Remover
          Speaker "Modifier" (okay, that one was unintentional)
          Slim Jim
          Lock Remover
          Car Jack Lever
          Paint Stirrer
          Coffee Stirrer
          Fire Poker
          Tire Deflator (also unintentional)
          Disciplinary Aid
          Rust Remover
          Outlet "Tester"
          Others?

          Justin
          "Wow it's red! That doesn't look like the standard Marshall red. It's more like hooker lipstick/clown nose/poodle pecker red." - Chuck H. -
          "Of course that means playing **LOUD** , best but useless solution to modern sissy snowflake players." - J.M. Fahey -
          "All I ever managed to do with that amp was... kill small rodents within a 50 yard radius of my practice building." - Tone Meister -

          Comment


          • #20
            Gosh, Justin! You and your Best Friend Screwdriver sure have seen a lot together
            If it still won't get loud enough, it's probably broken. - Steve Conner
            If the thing works, stop fixing it. - Enzo
            We need more chaos in music, in art... I'm here to make it. - Justin Thomas
            MANY things in human experience can be easily differentiated, yet *impossible* to express as a measurement. - Juan Fahey

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Justin Thomas View Post
              Jobs the BFS has done:

              Screwdriver
              Chisel
              Hammer
              Prybar
              Toilet Snake
              Cap Discharger
              Fingernail Cleaner
              Socket Holder cuz I'm too lazy to get a ratchet
              Drum Stick
              Air Hole Maker
              Oil Filter Removal Aid
              Staple Remover
              Speaker "Modifier" (okay, that one was unintentional)
              Slim Jim
              Lock Remover
              Car Jack Lever
              Paint Stirrer
              Coffee Stirrer
              Fire Poker
              Tire Deflator (also unintentional)
              Disciplinary Aid
              Rust Remover
              Outlet "Tester"
              Others?

              Justin
              LMAO

              "Disciplinary Aid" That's my favorite
              "Take two placebos, works twice as well." Enzo

              "Now get off my lawn with your silicooties and boom-chucka speakers and computers masquerading as amplifiers" Justin Thomas

              "If you're not interested in opinions and the experience of others, why even start a thread?
              You can't just expect consent." Helmholtz

              Comment


              • #22
                I remember tantalum caps being used in a lot of discrete FM receivers back in the 1970s, especially car stereos. For some reason replacement with an electrolytic cap of the same value, even for tests, would never work at all. The tats used to get thermally intermitant and we troubleshot them a lot with a can of freeze.

                Comment


                • #23
                  When I was in the hi-fi biz in the late 80s/early 90s, one of our brands' preamps had tantalums, of which I replaced a fair number owing to leakage causing scratchy pots. Another brand changed from tantalums to electrolytics.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    from http://www.kemet.com/Lists/ProductCa...aLdPerChar.pdf

                    Click image for larger version

Name:	kemet.gif
Views:	1
Size:	82.7 KB
ID:	846150

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      In my tests I subjected the Kemet tants to about twice their rated voltage before failure. One unit failed at a reverse voltage just over the rated forward voltage. Also, I once installed the same Kemet tants backwards in an unusual layout. Being in cathode circuits the 15V rated caps probably didn't see more than +2V and they not only didn't fail, but they performed as normal. When I discovered the error I removed the caps. drained them somewhat slowly through a resistor, tested them for value and then reinstalled them correctly. Those caps are still working fine nine years now.

                      I don't think I'd use a tant close to it's rated voltage or in any AC circuit where near rated inverse voltage could occur. I've had no trouble with them so far though. And I've also not heard of any trouble with the ones installed in a hundred thousand Mesa products.

                      I'm interested in these high UF ceramics though. I'd throw my remaining tants at a moving car if I thought something less sneered upon was available.
                      "Take two placebos, works twice as well." Enzo

                      "Now get off my lawn with your silicooties and boom-chucka speakers and computers masquerading as amplifiers" Justin Thomas

                      "If you're not interested in opinions and the experience of others, why even start a thread?
                      You can't just expect consent." Helmholtz

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Here's the full analysis from Kemet regarding cap failure modes. I don't disagree that short-circuit is most common, just as shorts are most common with SS rectifiers. This doesn't preclude any other possibility.

                        https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rc...qe4ViJpDuG5HDQ

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by Mick Bailey View Post
                          I don't disagree that short-circuit is most common, just as shorts are most common with SS rectifiers. This doesn't preclude any other possibility.
                          That's what I thought as well. "Dominant" to me only implies a majority, or more than half of failures. Not really exclusive.
                          Interesting though, that for tants, even opens will have probably started as shorts.
                          Originally posted by Enzo
                          I have a sign in my shop that says, "Never think up reasons not to check something."


                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Like anything else, the dominant failure mode of output transistors is E-C shorts. Certainly I have replaced many with C-B shorts too. But E-C is what I expect to see.
                            Education is what you're left with after you have forgotten what you have learned.

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X