So, bottom line, the fact that replacement is sometimes cheaper than repair is a consequence of labor being expensive vs parts being cheap.
Having said that, reworking SMD usually takes less time than through-hole. So the labor cost are actually lower. But, the replacement cost might be even lower still!
For me, it's not a matter of through hole is "better," but SMD is cheaper. Tube guitar amps that I build are old school with turrets, etc, but just about anything else I'll go with SMD without thinking twice. It's no harder to populate a new PCB, even by hand, and it's WAY easier to rework SMD (with a modest investment in tools.) It's also cheaper, but that's a major feature only for OEM bean counters. Both engineers and technicians like SMD for practical reasons; it's actually easier to work with if you have the tools and a little experience.
Old farts (of which I am one) can choose to disbelieve me, but that's just a symptom of being too old to learn new tricks.
Having said that, reworking SMD usually takes less time than through-hole. So the labor cost are actually lower. But, the replacement cost might be even lower still!
For me, it's not a matter of through hole is "better," but SMD is cheaper. Tube guitar amps that I build are old school with turrets, etc, but just about anything else I'll go with SMD without thinking twice. It's no harder to populate a new PCB, even by hand, and it's WAY easier to rework SMD (with a modest investment in tools.) It's also cheaper, but that's a major feature only for OEM bean counters. Both engineers and technicians like SMD for practical reasons; it's actually easier to work with if you have the tools and a little experience.
Old farts (of which I am one) can choose to disbelieve me, but that's just a symptom of being too old to learn new tricks.
Comment