Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Amp buzz radio interference

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Yes the wire/lead coming from the input Cliff jack is shielded/with a ground wire and terminates into pin 7 V1. All the noises have stopped save the radio interference which comes and goes depending on the guitar cord location. The ticking/scratchy low noise sound seems to affect the other amps so I think it not an issue for this amp specifically.

    If I could minimize the radio noise this one is fixed.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Ampzone View Post
      Yes the wire/lead coming from the input Cliff jack is shielded/with a ground wire and terminates into pin 7 V1. All the noises have stopped save the radio interference which comes and goes depending on the guitar cord location. The ticking/scratchy low noise sound seems to affect the other amps so I think it not an issue for this amp specifically.

      If I could minimize the radio noise this one is fixed.
      The question was if the input jack has a (close-by) chassis ground connection.
      Last edited by Helmholtz; 10-30-2020, 08:39 PM.
      - Own Opinions Only -

      Comment


      • #19
        Ampzone

        To answer HH's question, a picture of the jack in your amp from the inside would be worth a thousand words.
        Experience is something you get, just after you really needed it.

        Comment


        • #20
          I added a 100pf Silver Mica cap ..all I had on hand. From the Cliff jack ground tab to chassis. Radio interference went away. Quiet and normal.

          I wonder if it needs to be closer to a 47pf?

          Comment


          • #21
            Another win for raiken

            I guess that the actual value is immaterial, won’t affect the sound.
            100pF is pretty low though, I wouldn’t go lower.
            My band:- http://www.youtube.com/user/RedwingBand

            Comment


            • #22
              It's actually an established RFI rejection measure for equipment where the shield of the input cable is not directly connected to the chassis.
              IIRC, I first learned about this in an EMC seminar in the late 80s.
              - Own Opinions Only -

              Comment


              • #23
                Originally posted by Helmholtz View Post
                It's actually an established RFI rejection measure for equipment where the shield of the input cable is not directly connected to the chassis.
                IIRC, I first learned about this in an EMC seminar in the late 80s.
                Very cool! You think 47pf is better is 100pf okay in your opinion? Obviously its not part of the original circuit, but it seems to work very well. I can try and locate a 47pf if its preferred.

                Comment


                • #24
                  Originally posted by Ampzone View Post

                  Very cool! You think 47pf is better is 100pf okay in your opinion? Obviously its not part of the original circuit, but it seems to work very well. I can try and locate a 47pf if its preferred.
                  Why change the value if it works well?
                  The cap shorts radio frequencies to chassis ground. Higher value has lower impedance and also shorts lower RFI frequencies. There's no optimum capacitance. Just needs to be large enough for the RF involved.

                  Cap has absolutely no effect on amp sound.

                  Great amp, btw.
                  Last edited by Helmholtz; 11-03-2020, 12:14 AM.
                  - Own Opinions Only -

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X