I am wondering if 93 mA (per side) is an acceptable bias current for this amp, recommended is 50mA. (Schematic attached)
Here is the background:
- I am working on a customer's Carvin TS100. I put in EL34's in it and new tubes for the phase inverter about 6 months ago. Biased it but could not get it down to the 50mA that is recommended but is sounded clean and looked good on the scope.
- The amp just came back to me, the complaint was that audio stopped working in 1 channel and then he switched it to bridge more and shortly after no sound at all. He said he smelled something burnt.
- When I opened it up, nothing was actually burnt. When I powered it up there was indeed no output (I used an 8 load for each channel). I tested the power supply and both OT and found no problems. I did find that R76 value had gotten out of spec, so it was probably what the customer was smelling. It was about 530 and should be 350. Then proceeded to retest and the output was back and working fine (I hate intermittent issues). I replaced R76 and rebiased the amp. I got the same results as the first time I worked on it which was about 93 mA on each side for the lowest I could set the current. I'm sure if I switched the bias more switches to 6L6 more and put 5881s in it I could get the current down but Carvin only gived 1 value for all tube configurations.
Thanks in advance,
Kevin
Here is the background:
- I am working on a customer's Carvin TS100. I put in EL34's in it and new tubes for the phase inverter about 6 months ago. Biased it but could not get it down to the 50mA that is recommended but is sounded clean and looked good on the scope.
- The amp just came back to me, the complaint was that audio stopped working in 1 channel and then he switched it to bridge more and shortly after no sound at all. He said he smelled something burnt.
- When I opened it up, nothing was actually burnt. When I powered it up there was indeed no output (I used an 8 load for each channel). I tested the power supply and both OT and found no problems. I did find that R76 value had gotten out of spec, so it was probably what the customer was smelling. It was about 530 and should be 350. Then proceeded to retest and the output was back and working fine (I hate intermittent issues). I replaced R76 and rebiased the amp. I got the same results as the first time I worked on it which was about 93 mA on each side for the lowest I could set the current. I'm sure if I switched the bias more switches to 6L6 more and put 5881s in it I could get the current down but Carvin only gived 1 value for all tube configurations.
Thanks in advance,
Kevin
Comment